National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Note: Not all NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices (ICOs) participate in Announcements. Applicants should carefully note which ICOs participate in this announcement and view their respective areas of research interest at the ICO-Specific Scientific Interests website. ICOs that do not participate in this announcement will not consider applications for funding.
U24 Resource-Related Research Projects – Cooperative Agreements
Only one application per institution is allowed as defined in Part 2, Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.
Through this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), the National Cancer Institute (NCI) solicits applications from institutions/organizations that propose to maintain or establish a Pharmacokinetics Resource Laboratory (PK Laboratory) to support the Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN). The PK Laboratory will organize biospecimen collections and provide subsequent analyses of pharmacokinetic endpoints, drug-drug interactions, cytochrome P450 (CYP) interactions, pharmacodynamics, and food effects in ETCTN studies of NCI Investigational New Drug (IND) agents. The overarching goal of the ETCTN PK Laboratory is to advance the clinical development of NCI IND agents by providing a comprehensive understanding of pharmacokinetic behavior of these agents under study in ETCTN trials. The ETCTN PK Laboratory will engage physicians, clinical pharmacologists, nurses, and scientists who have appropriate expertise in pharmacokinetic studies for early drug development and translational research. This NOFO seeks U24 applications from multidisciplinary institutions/organizations to conduct all pharmacokinetic studies for ETCTN early phase clinical trials filed to IND applications in the NCI Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD), Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP).
To develop the means to cure as many cancer patients as possible and to control the disease in those patients who are not cured. Cancer Treatment Research includes the development and evaluation of improved methods of cancer treatment through the support and performance of both fundamental and applied laboratory and clinical research.
| Application Due Dates | Review and Award Cycles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New | Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed) | AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed | Scientific Merit Review | Advisory Council Review | Earliest Start Date |
| June 30, 2026 | June 30, 2026 | Not Applicable | November 2026 | January 2027 | April 2027 |
All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
No late applications will be accepted for this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO).
Not Applicable
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).
Conformance to all requirements (both in the How to Apply - Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the How to Apply - Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.
Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity.
The purpose of this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) is to fund one Pharmacokinetics Resource Laboratory (PK Laboratory) for the Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN) as a central resource to support all ETCTN sites participating in the networks clinical trials. The ETCTN PK Laboratory will be responsible for the organization of biospecimen collection from all network sites as well as for the subsequent analyses of pharmacokinetic endpoints, drug-drug interactions, cytochromes P450 (CYP) interactions, pharmacodynamics, and food effects. This PK Laboratory will conduct all pharmacokinetic studies for ETCTN clinical trials involving Investigational New Drug (IND) agents under the regulatory sponsorship of NCIs Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD), Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP). The ETCTN is funded through separate awards under the NOFO listed below.
The ETCTN and its supporting infrastructure was established for early-stage clinical development of novel anticancer treatments that are then evaluated in clinical trials conducted under DCTD/CTEP IND in national, high-priority areas of unmet medical need. The ETCTN also uses NCI resources to molecularly characterized tumors to identify appropriate biomarkers that can be used to select patients most likely to respond to specific agents. ETCTN clinical studies determine the safety of IND agent drug combinations, find early signals of clinical activity of these agents in targeted populations, and perform in-depth analysis of biomarkers of response and resistance. DCTD/CTEP currently holds approximately 210 INDs for investigational oncology agents/combinations which involve about 100 collaborative agreements with pharmaceutical/biotechnology companies. Agents under evaluation include, but are not limited to, small molecules, immune-oncology agents, antibodies, targeted toxins, oligonucleotides, and gene transfer agents.
Pharmacokinetics determinations (with appropriate validation and interpretation) include pharmacokinetic measures of agent absorption (A), distribution (D), metabolism (M), and excretion (E). Commonly determined parameters include area under the curve (AUC), maximum agent concentration (Cmax), clearance (CL), half-life, volume of distribution, and others. Drugs may be eliminated in the unchanged (parent) form or undergo metabolism to one or more active and/or inactive forms. The overall set of processes monitored (often referred to as ADME) ultimately determines systemic exposure to a drug and its metabolites after drug administration. This systemic exposure, reflected in plasma drug or metabolite, concentrations, or both, is generally correlated with both beneficial and adverse drug effects. All drugs and biologics show inter- and intra-individual variability in PK measures and parameters.
The ETCTN PK Laboratory provides the major resource for rapid, efficient, systematic evaluation and determination of the ADME profiles in patients participating in early phase ETCTN clinical trials. The ETCTN PK Laboratory is responsible for establishing pharmacokinetic profiles of DCTD/CTEP IND anticancer agents and their metabolites in blood. Specific agents (alone and in combinations) will be analyzed for their half-lives and rates of elimination for these investigational agents to ensure the safe and effective therapeutic management of drugs in an individual patient. The ETCTN PK Laboratory is responsible for studies that evaluate drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion, pharmacodynamics, as well occasional studies to evaluate proof of mechanism and suitable patient candidates. The ETCTN PK Laboratory is expected to have:
Interactions with Other NCI-supported Programs: In addition to NCI DCTD/CTEP staff and the ETCTN Lead Academic Organization and their participating sites, other NCI grant and contract-supported programs as well as NCI Program Advisory Committees having important supporting roles in carrying out the research objectives of the ETCTN. Thus, the PK Laboratory is required to interact, as appropriate, with such entities/programs as the DCTD Biometric Research Program (BRP); DCTD Cancer Diagnosis Program (CDP); Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU) with its Regulatory Support Services (RSS); NCI Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB); the ETCTN Clinical Data Management System (CDMS); the ETCTN Clinical Trials Monitoring Service (CTMS); and the NCTN Radiotherapy and Imaging Core Services Center (IROC).
Applicants for this NOFO are expected to have in place a standing infrastructure to support PK studies for ETCTN clinical trials from trial initiation through clinical development of NCI-IND agents. The ETCTN Pharmacokinetics Resource Laboratory application must include the following 3 functional components:
Technical Services Core - This functional component should provide the technical services for the full range of PK and associated assays and analyses needed to support ETCTN clinical trials.
Scientific Leadership and Project Development Core - This functional component should provide scientific leadership and expertise for a team-science approach to project development in support of PK activities for the ETCTN.
Biospecimen Collection, Tracking, Processing and Data Reporting Core - This functional Component should provide an integrated system/service for the collection, tracking, and processing of biospecimens from the ETCTN Lead Academic Organizations and their participating sites for ETCTN clinical trials.
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Cooperative Agreement: A financial assistance mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities. See Section VI.2 for additional information about the substantial involvement for this NOFO.
The OER Glossary and the How to Apply - Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.
Not Allowed: Only accepting applications that do not propose clinical trials. Note: Applications may propose activities involving human subjects that are not deemed clinical trials.
NCI intends to commit $850,000 in FY 2027 to fund one award.
Application budgets are not limited but need to reflect the actual needs of the proposed project.
The total project period requested must not exceed 6 years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.
Higher Education Institutions - Includes all types
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
For-Profit Organizations
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are not allowed.
Applicant Organizations
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
All PD(s)/PI(s) must be registered with ORCID. The personal profile associated with the PD(s)/PI(s) eRA Commons account must be linked to a valid ORCID ID. For more information on linking an ORCID ID to an eRA Commons personal profile see the ORCID topic in our eRA Commons online help.
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the How to Apply - Application Guide.
Individual(s) designated as Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PDs/PIs) are expected to be national and international leaders in cancer-related pharmacokinetic studies for early phase trials of novel therapeutic agents and translational research. Proposed PD/PIs must be highly capable of interacting with inter- and trans-disciplinary team-based research with investigators involved in the design and conduct of clinical trials.
This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.
Only one application per institution (normally identified by having a unique UEI or NIH IPF number) is allowed.
The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise (in this NOFO, in a policy notice, or other notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to the requirements in the How to Apply - Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
All page limitations described in the How to Apply – Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
For this specific NOFO, the Research Strategy Section is limited to 30 pages.
The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply – Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Facilities & Other Resources: Provide a succinct description of the facilities and other resources/infrastructure that are available for the PK Laboratory. Include information on resources and resources/infrastructure that will be used for interactions with the ETCTN Lead Academic Organizations and their participating sites (e.g., information technology systems, logistical infrastructure, facilities for specimen receiving, tracking, and handling, etc.). The applicant should describe the storage facilities for biospecimens collected from national and international ETCTN trial sites and the analytical equipment available to perform pharmacokinetic studies and other analyses.
Other Attachments: Applicants must provide the following attachments. Applications that do not include these attachments will be deemed incomplete and withdrawn by CSR before review. The filename provided must be used for each attachment, as it will become a bookmark in the application.
Attachment 1. PK Laboratory Communications Plans (use filename Communications)
Attachment 2. PK Laboratory Organizational Charts (use filename OrgCharts)
Attachment 3. PK Laboratory Performance Timelines (Use filename Timelines)
Attachment 4. PK Laboratory Compliance with Good Laboratory Practice (use filename GLPCompliance)
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Applicants should designate appropriate qualified senior/key personnel with significant responsibility for PK Laboratory operations. Applicants should also identify senior/key personnel who are statisticians with expertise in early phase clinical trial pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
The requested budget should not include costs for the standardized central operational, regulatory and administrative support provided by the NCI or existing NCI Contractors that support the ETCTN. These services will be directly funded by the NCI. See: https://ctep.cancer.gov/initiativesPrograms/etctn_infrastructure.htm
In projecting costs, applicants should assume that the proposed ETCTN PK Laboratory will be required to process/analyze approximately 25,000 biospecimens per year. To justify the budget, applicants need to describe in detail the number of biospecimens expected for PK studies. For budget calculations, please note that the ETCTN is expected to have between each 4 to 6 ETCTN Lead Academic Organizations (LAOs) and each LAO is expected to accrue a minimum of 80 patients per year to early phase ETCTN clinical trials.
Pharmacokinetics, Specimen Collection, Tracking and Associated PK Activities. The request should include costs of research that are not considered a cost of treatment by medical insurers, and therefore are not reimbursed by insurers (e.g., blood and urine collection, etc.).
The budget should include costs for the following activities:
Budgets should not include or reflect any costs for the following activities:
Data Management: Cost for data management on site may be included. However, a clear justification must be provided to show that these costs are being incurred because the existing Clinical Trials Management System (CTMS) for data management that is provided by the NCI ETCTN program infrastructure is not sufficient to provide all needed data management for the proposed ETCTN PK Laboratory.
Funds for travel: Two representatives from the ETCTN PK Laboratory at least one of whom must be one of the PK Laboratory PD(s)/PI(s)] will be required to travel to at least one NCI/CTEP Early Drug Development (EDD) meeting per year for the purpose of enhancing communications between PK Laboratory PIs/Key staff and the ETCTN investigators conducting ETCTN trials and presenting key pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and other analyses from ETCTN trials.
Travel costs for two presenters for major national/international meetings should also be included in the budget for Scientific Leadership.
Senior/Key Person and Other Personnel: The budget request may include estimated costs of salary support (based on level-of-effort) for the PD(s)/PI(s), and other collaborators. Each individual designated as a PD/PI must commit a minimum of 1.2 person-months of effort per year. This minimal effort level must be maintained throughout the entire project period.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Specific Aims: Outline the specific aims of the proposed ETCTN PK Laboratory to perform comprehensive PK studies related to ETCTN studies evaluating novel anticancer treatments as well as other related assays/analyses including pharmacodynamics. These aims must be based on the demonstrated ability of the applicants to perform PK studies on about 25,000 biospecimens per year.
Research Strategy: Organize the overall Research Strategy section with sub-sections in the specified order and using the instructions below. Start each sub-section with the appropriate sub-section heading: Sub-section A. Overview; Sub-section B. Techical Services Core; Sub-section C. Scientific Leadership and Project Development Core; Sub-section D. Biospecimen Collection, Tracking, and Processing Core; and Sub-section E. Overall Progress Report (applicable for renewal applications only).
Sub-section A. Overview
Sub-section B. Technical Services Core
Sub-section C. Scientific Leadership and Project Development Core
Outline how the leadership of the PK Laboratory will oversee the conduct of ETCTN pharmacokinetic studies and facilitate interactions with other ETCTN and NCI staff. Address the following specific aspects:
Sub-section D. Biospecimen Collection, Tracking, Processing and Data Reporting Core
Sub-section E. Overall Progress Report (applicable to Renewal applications only)
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
Other Plan(s):
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply - Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:
If you answered Yes to the question Are Human Subjects Involved? on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.
Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Delayed Onset Study
Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov
Part I. contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIHs electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply – Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the How to Apply - Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organizations profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by components of participating organizations, NIH. Applications that are incomplete, non-compliant and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.
Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector Grant Self Disclosure Program at grantdisclosures@oig.hhs.gov.
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
For this particular NOFO, note the following:
The most crucial characteristics of the ETCTN Pharmacokinetics Resource Laboratory to be proposed under this NOFO are its ability to provide comprehensive PK analyses of NCI DCTD/CTEP Investigational New Drug (IND) agents being evaluated in ETCTN clinical trials at the requisite scale of 25,000 biospecimens per year and to contribute its staff PK expertise to other aspects of ETCTN trials.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
Does the proposed PK Laboratory address the needs of the research network that it will serve? Is the scope of activities proposed for the PK Laboratory appropriate to meet those needs? Will successful completion of the aims bring unique advantages or capabilities to the research network?
Specific for this NOFO: What is the likelihood that the strategies proposed for pharmacokinetic analyses will significantly contribute to advancing the clinical development of NCI IND agents?
Are the PD(s)/PI(s) and other personnel well suited to their roles in the PK Laboratory? Do they have appropriate experience and training, and have they demonstrated experience and an ongoing record of accomplishments in managing pharmacokinetic research? Do the investigators demonstrate significant experience with coordinating collaborative clinical] research? If the Center is multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise and skills; are their [leadership approach, governance, plans for conflict resolution, and organizational structure] appropriate for the PK Laboratory? Does the applicant have experience overseeing selection and management of subawards, if needed?
Specific for this NOFO: How strong are the expertise, experience, and ability of the PK Laboratory team to analyze complex pharmacokinetic data and meet milestones and timelines? Does leadership show evidence of a collaborative, highly integrated, and effective program? Have the applicants made significant contributions to pharmacokinetic studies for early phase experimental therapeutic clinical trials? Is the level of clinical research-relevant administrative experience and skills that the PD(s)/PI(s) and other key personnel have in the organization adequate? Does the applicant provide adequate senior and other statistical support staff for PK analysis?
Does the application propose novel organizational concepts, management strategies, or instrumentation in coordinating the research network the PK Laboratory will serve? Are the concepts, strategies, or instrumentation novel to one type of research program or applicable in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of organizational concepts, management strategies or instrumentation proposed?
Specific for this NOFO: Does the proposed PK Laboratory involve novel or improved approaches and/or methods to enhance pharmacokinetic studies or their conduct in early phase clinical trials?
Are the overall strategy, operational plan, and organizational structure well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the goals of the research network the PK Laboratory will serve? Will the investigators promote strategies to ensure a robust and unbiased scientific approach across the network, as appropriate for the work proposed? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the network is in the early stages of operation, does the proposed strategy adequately establish feasibility and manage the risks associated with the activities of the network? Are an appropriate plan for work-flow and a well-established timeline proposed? Have the investigators presented adequate plans to ensure consideration of relevant biological variables, such as sex, for studies of vertebrate animals or human subjects?
Specific for this NOFO: Do the research strategy and communication plan demonstrate an appropriate understanding of pharmacokinetics in drug development and of the methodologies available to exploit these opportunities? Is the planned level of support for analyses, including the statistical analysis plans, appropriate? Are the capabilities and procedures for data collection, data management, data analysis adequate and sufficient at the PK Laboratory? Are the procedures to monitor and analyze the data sufficiently rigorous in terms of the safety of patients/participants enrolled on the network's clinical trials?
Will the institutional environment in which the PK Laboratory will operate contribute to the probability of success in facilitating the research network it serves? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the PK Laboratory proposed? Will the PK Laboratory benefit from unique features of the institutional environment, infrastructure, or personnel? Are resources available within the scientific environment to support electronic information handling?
Specific to this NOFO: How valid and reproducible are the PK Laboratory's quality assurance/quality control indicators? Are sufficient support staff available with the skills needed to implement PK Laboratory studies and to analyze PK and pharmacodynamic data for early phase experimental therapeutic clinical trials? How appropriate are the proposed organizational structure and institutional environment of the PK Laboratory for optimal communications, data collection/transmittal in an accurate and timely manner, specimen transfer between the ETCTN sites and NCI-supported systems?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
This NOFO only accepts applications that do not propose clinical trials. Note: Applications may propose activities involving human subjects that are not deemed clinical trials.
When the proposed project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for inclusion. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research.
The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following three points: (1) a complete description of all proposed procedures including the species, strains, ages, sex, and total numbers of animals to be used; (2) justifications that the species is appropriate for the proposed research and why the research goals cannot be accomplished using an alternative non-animal model; and (3) interventions including analgesia, anesthesia, sedation, palliative care, and humane endpoints that will be used to limit any unavoidable discomfort, distress, pain and injury in the conduct of scientifically valuable research. Methods of euthanasia and justification for selected methods, if NOT consistent with the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, is also required but is found in a separate section of the application. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals Section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animals Section.
Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
For Resubmissions (as applicable), the committee will evaluate the application as now presented, taking into consideration the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group and changes made to the project.
For Renewals (as applicable), the committee will consider the progress made in the last funding period.
For Revisions (as applicable), the committee will consider the appropriateness of the proposed expansion of the scope of the project. If the Revision application relates to a specific line of investigation presented in the original application that was not recommended for approval by the committee, then the committee will consider whether the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group are adequate and whether substantial changes are clearly evident.
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Reviewers will assess whether the project presents special opportunities for furthering research programs through the use of unusual talent, resources, populations, or environmental conditions that exist in other countries and either are not readily available in the United States or augment existing U.S. resources.
Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Reviewers will comment on whether the Resource Sharing Plan(s) (e.g., Sharing Model Organisms) or the rationale for not sharing the resources, is reasonable.
For networks involving key biological and/or chemical resources, reviewers will comment on the brief plans proposed for identifying and ensuring the validity of those resources.
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by Center for Scientific Review, in accordance with NIH peer review policies and practices, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will receive a written critique.
May undergo a committee process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.
Requests for reconsideration of initial peer review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this NOFO.
Applications will be assigned to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this NOFO. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the National Cancer Advisory Board. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.5.1. Just-in-Time Procedures. This request is not a Notice of Award nor should it be construed to be an indicator of possible funding.
Prior to making an award, NIH reviews an applicants federal award history in SAM.gov to ensure sound business practices. An applicant can review and comment on any information in the Responsibility/Qualification records available in SAM.gov. NIH will consider any comments by the applicant in the Responsibility/Qualification records in SAM.gov to ascertain the applicants integrity, business ethics, and performance record of managing Federal awards per 2 CFR Part 200.206 Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants. This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.4.4 Disposition of Applications.
A Notice of Award (NoA) is the official authorizing document notifying the applicant that an award has been made and that funds may be requested from the designated HHS payment system or office. The NoA is signed by the Grants Management Officer and emailed to the recipients business official.
In accepting the award, the recipient agrees that any activities under the award are subject to all provisions currently in effect or implemented during the period of the award, other Department regulations and policies in effect at the time of the award, and applicable statutory provisions.
Recipients must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.6. Funding Restrictions. Any pre-award costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the applicant's own risk. For more information on the Notice of Award, please refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 5. The Notice of Award and NIH Grants & Funding website, see Award Process.
Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Recipient institutions must ensure that protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the recipient must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.
The following Federal wide and HHS-specific policy requirements apply to awards funded through NIH:
All federal statutes and regulations relevant to federal financial assistance, including those highlighted in NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4 Public Policy Requirements, Objectives and Other Appropriation Mandates.
By applying for or accepting federal funds from HHS, recipients certify compliance with all federal antidiscrimination laws and these requirements and that complying with those laws is a material condition of receiving federal funding streams. Recipients are responsible for ensuring subrecipients, contractors, and partners also comply.
Applicants and recipients are strongly encouraged to refer to the NIH Directors Statement of Priorities, entitled Advancing NIHs Mission Through a Unified Strategy.
Recipients are responsible for ensuring that their activities comply with all applicable federal regulations. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.340, by accepting an NIH award, the recipient agrees that continued funding for the award is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds, recipient satisfactory performance, compliance with the Terms and Conditions of the award, and may also otherwise be terminated, to the extent authorized by law, if the agency determines that the award no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities, in line with 2 CFR 200.340(a)(4).
Pursuant to the Cybersecurity Act of 2015, Div. N, § 405, Pub. Law 114-113, 6 USC § 1533(d), the HHS Secretary has established a common set of voluntary, consensus-based, and industry-led guidelines, best practices, methodologies, procedures, and processes.
Successful recipients under this NOFO agree that:
When recipients, subrecipients, or third-party entities have:
Cybersecurity plans and procedures must at minimum include the following:
All activities proposed in your application and budget narrative must align with applicable law, including but not limited to statutes, executive orders, federal regulations and applicable judicial holdings. Accordingly, discretionary awards shall not be used to fund, promote, encourage, subsidize, or facilitate; racial preferences or other forms of racial discrimination by the recipient, including activities where race or intentional proxies for race will be used as a selection criterion for employment or program participation; denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans, or the belief that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic; illegal immigration; or any other initiatives that compromise public safety. If an application does not align, the application will not receive funding to the extent permitted by law and applicable court orders.
For applications involving substance abuse, the application must not support harm reduction. Please see Updated Funding Guidance for Recipients on Supplies and Services.
The following special terms of award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) administrative guidelines, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) grant administration regulations at 2 CFR Part 200, and other HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policies.
The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the cooperative agreement, an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH programmatic involvement with the recipients is anticipated during the performance of the activities. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the recipients for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the recipients and NIH as defined below.
The PD(s)/PI(s) will have the primary responsibility for all activities of the ETCTN PK Laboratory as outlined below:
PDs/PIs and the PK Laboratory staff will be required to use appropriate applications/electronic systems of the NCI DCTD/CTEP Enterprise system that supports the ETCTN, including, but not limited to, the Clinical Trials Monitoring System (CTMS), Clinical Data Management System (CDMS), and the Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU) as well as the ETCTN BioRepository and Accessioning Center. See: https://ctep.cancer.gov/initiativesPrograms/etctn_infrastructure.htm.
The PDs/PIs, as well as other appropriate PK Laboratory investigators will be members of the NCI Investigational Drug Steering Committee (IDSC) and will be required to attend IDSC meetings and serve on the ETCTN Pharmacology Task Force. See: https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccct/steering-committees/investigational-drug.
Recipients will comply with the NCI DCTD CRADA agreements and the Intellectural Property Option to Collaborators for ETCTN clinical trials conducted under a NCI DCTD/CTEP Investigation New Drug (IND) applications and/or Investigator Device Exemption (IDE). See: https://ctep.cancer.gov/branches/rab/intellectual_property_option_to_collaborators.htm.
Recipients will retain custody of and have primary rights to the data and software developed under these awards, subject to Government rights of access consistent with HHS, PHS, and NIH policies.
NIH staff have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards, as described below:
Additionally, an agency program official or NCI program director will be responsible for the normal scientific and programmatic stewardship of the award and will be named in the award notice. Designatied NCI Program Director(s) will have substantial involvement as a Project Scientist(s).
NCI reserves the right to reduce the budget or withhold an award in the event of substantial awardee under-performance or other substantial failure to comply with the terms of award.
Areas of Joint Responsibility include:
Dispute Resolution:
Any disagreements that may arise in scientific or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between recipients and NIH may be brought to Dispute Resolution. A Dispute Resolution Panel composed of three members will be convened: a designee of the Steering Committee chosen without NIH staff voting, one NIH designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area who is chosen by the other two; in the case of individual disagreement, the first member may be chosen by the individual recipient. This special dispute resolution procedure does not alter the recipient's right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in accordance with PHS regulation 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and HHS regulation 45 CFR Part 16.
A Data Management and Sharing Plan (DMS Plan) is required for any NIH-funded or conducted research that will generate scientific data. Applicants must submit the DMS Plan at the time of application using the NIH DMS Plan Format Page. The DMS Plan must address the elements in the structured format should not exceed two (2) pages. Where the DMS Plan Format Page requires a Yes or No response, no additional narrative is allowed.
When multiple years are involved, recipients will be required to submit the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.4.1 Reporting. To learn more about post-award monitoring and reporting, see the NIH Grants & Funding website, see Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting.
A final RPPR, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.6 Closeout. NIH NOFOs outline intended research goals and objectives. Post award, NIH will review and measure performance based on the details and outcomes that are shared within the RPPR, as described at 2 CFR Part 200.301.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
eRA Service Desk - Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, and post-submission issues.
Grants.gov Support Center - Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and services (e.g., Workspace, subscriptions).
NCI ETCTN RFA
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Telephone: 240-276-5930
Email: NCIETCTNRFA@mail.nih.gov
Examine your eRA Commons account for review assignment and contact information (information appears two weeks after the submission due date).
Office of Grants Administration
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Telephone: 240-276-6291
Email: NCIFinancialContact@nih.gov
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 2 CFR Part 200.