National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE (NIDA)
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Note: Not all NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices (ICOs) participate in Announcements. Applicants should carefully note which ICOs participate in this announcement and view their respective areas of research interest at the ICO-Specific Scientific Interests website. ICOs that do not participate in this announcement will not consider applications for funding.
X01 Resource Access Award
See Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.
The National Institutes of Health seek to advance their mission by providing the scientific community with the opportunity to request access to biospecimens from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM (ABCD) Study, the HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) Study, and the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study to conduct research consistent with the respective study objectives that will maximize the scientific utility of these limited samples. Applications should expand the knowledge gained from these studies and advance our understanding of the multiple genetic and environmental factors, such as exposure to substances, that affect health and disease over the course of a lifetime.
To support basic, clinical, translational, and implementation research in the field of substance use. To develop new knowledge and approaches for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of drug use, misuse, and addiction, drug overdose, and related health outcomes, including HIV/AIDS.
| Application Due Dates | Review and Award Cycles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New | Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed) | AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed | Scientific Merit Review | Advisory Council Review | Earliest Start Date |
| October 01, 2026 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | December 2026 | January 2027 | April 2027 |
| April 15, 2027 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | July 2027 | August 2027 | December 2027 |
| September 15, 2027 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | December 2027 | January 2028 | April 2028 |
| April 17, 2028 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | July 2028 | August 2028 | December 2028 |
| September 15, 2028 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | December 2028 | January 2029 | April 2029 |
| April 17, 2029 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | July 2029 | August 2029 | December 2029 |
All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
Not Applicable
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).
Conformance to all requirements (both in the How to Apply - Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the How to Apply - Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.
Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity.
Background
This Resource Access Program allows investigators to apply for access to biospecimens from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM (ABCD) Study, the HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) Study - collectively known as the NIH Brain Development Cohorts (NBDC) - and the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study for use in conducting research consistent with study objectives. These biospecimens are stored in a temperature-controlled facility for subsequent analyses.
NBDC
Specimen collection for both studies is ongoing. Available specimens include:
The ABCD and HBCD Studies release data to the scientific community through the NBDC Data Hub. Annual releases include curated data from neuroimaging and all assessment domains, including some data from biosamples, but not the biosamples themselves. In addition, residential history derived socio-environmental data is available to contextualize primary data collected. Please visit nbdc-datahub.org for more information on the data releases.
PATH Study
The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA), signed in June 2009, created the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) and granted it the authority to regulate the manufacture, marketing, and distribution of cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, and smokeless tobacco in order to protect public health. In 2016, CTP's authority was extended through a "deeming" rule to include all tobacco products, including electronic cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), cigars, pipe tobacco, hookah tobacco, and other tobacco products such as nicotine gels. A full description of the FSPTCA can be found on FDA's website (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ31/pdf/PLAW-111publ31.pdf).
The PATH Study is a collaboration between the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), NIH, and the CTP and was launched in 2011 to inform FDA's regulatory activities under the FSPTCA. This ongoing longitudinal cohort study follows a nationally representative sample of approximately 46,000 participants, including youth (ages 12 to 17) and adults (ages 18+) who currently or formerly use nicotine and tobacco products as well as those who have never used these products. The goal of the study is to generate epidemiologic data on tobacco use behaviors including patterns of use, attitudes, beliefs, exposures, and related health outcomes. Starting in 2013, the study consists of annual and biennial primary waves of data collection with the multi-wave design allowing for longitudinal assessment of participants' patterns of nicotine and tobacco product use, nicotine and tobacco exposures, health, and disease risks. The study is planned to continue through 2030.
Stored biospecimens available to researchers include urine, serum, plasma, and genomic DNA. Applicants should review the Study Biospecimen Access Program information before completing the X01 application. More information on the PATH Study data and biospecimen collection can be found here: Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Series.
Detailed information on the policies for obtaining PATH Study biospecimens, types of biospecimens available, and the application and review processes may be found on the PATH Study Biospecimen Access Program web page at the University of Michigan's National Addiction & HIV Data Archive Program (NAHDAP), part of the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research's (ICPSR). Applicants should review this information before applying for access to the PATH Study biospecimens.
Specific Areas of Research Interest
Applications should expand the knowledge gained from these studies and advance our understanding of the multiple genetic and environmental factors that affect health and disease over the course of a lifetime. Access to samples will be limited to investigators proposing meritorious and feasible studies consistent with study objectives. Additionally, research areas of interest include, but are not limited to, those listed below:
NBDC: Genomics, including epigenetics, substance exposure, inflammation and stress, proteomics, neurotoxicants and environmental exposures, microbiome, and nutriture will be given the highest priority for access to ABCD or HBCD Study biospecimens. Studies that expand the knowledge of child and adolescent health more broadly, but not exploratory or pilot studies, will also be considered.
PATH Study: Research priorities for tobacco regulatory science will be given the highest priority for access to PATH Study biospecimens. Studies that address other objectives that expand the knowledge of tobacco use and/or tobacco related health outcomes will also be considered.
Specific Requirements and Expectations for this Opportunity
No funds will be provided through this opportunity. Applicants will be responsible for costs associated with conducting the research and sample distribution. Several NIH funding opportunities may be of interest:
Recipients who are granted access to NBDC or PATH Study biospecimens will be required to adhere to terms in the Data Use Certification and applicable reporting and data sharing requirements. See the Requesting Biospecimens page of the NBDC Biobank or the PATH Study BAP Overview and application guide for more information.
NBDC
Interested applicants are strongly encouraged to explore available biospecimens and review the key steps in applying for biospecimens via the NBDC Biobank portal or contact the NBDC team at nbdc_biobank@mail.nih.gov.
PATH Study
Interested applicants are strongly encouraged to explore available biospecimens and review the key steps in applying for biospecimens as described here: How to Apply for Biospecimens | NAHDAP.
For further information on special considerations for NIDA applicants, please see the Resources section on the NIDA Grants and Funding page.
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Other: A financial assistance mechanism that is not a grant or cooperative agreement. Examples include access to research resources or pre-applications.
The OER Glossary and the How to Apply - Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.
Not Allowed: Only accepting applications that do not propose clinical trials. Note: Applications may propose activities involving human subjects that are not deemed clinical trials.
The total number of projects granted access to biospecimens is dependent on the number of meritorious applications and the availability of biospecimens.
Not Applicable; funds are not awarded via the X01 mechanism.
The scope of the proposed project should determine the project period. The maximum project period is 5 years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.
Higher Education Institutions - Includes all types
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
For-Profit Organizations
Local Governments
Federal Governments
Other
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.
NIH will no longer issue awards (i.e., new, renewal, or non-competing continuation) to domestic or foreign entities that involve foreign subawards/subcontracts. All NIH-funded research involving foreign subawards/subcontracts must be submitted in response to a NOFO that is specifically designated for funded international collaborations. See NIH Grants Policy Statement 16.8 Collaborative International Research Awards.
Applications involving foreign subawards/subcontracts submitted in response to this NOFO will be deemed noncompliant and will not be considered for funding. This policy applies to all monetary international collaborations resulting in foreign subawards/subcontracts, however, it does not preclude unfunded international collaborations or foreign components, funding for foreign consultants, or procurement of unique equipment or supplies from foreign vendors.
Applicant Organizations
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
All PD(s)/PI(s) must be registered with ORCID. The personal profile associated with the PD(s)/PI(s) eRA Commons account must be linked to a valid ORCID ID. For more information on linking an ORCID ID to an eRA Commons personal profile see the ORCID topic in our eRA Commons online help.
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the How to Apply - Application Guide.
This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:
The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise (in this NOFO, in a policy notice, or other notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to the requirements in the How to Apply - Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
All page limitations described in the How to Apply – Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply – Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Please follow these additional instructions as this is not an application for funding:
Total Federal Funds Requested: Enter $0
Total Federal and Non Federal Funds: Enter $0
Estimated Program Income: Enter $0.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Describe facilities where laboratory analyses will be done in Facilities and Other Resources.
Describe instrumentation that will be used to conduct laboratory analyses in Equipment.
Other Attachments:
Availability of Biospecimens (required): Include the Resource Availability and Impact Report (NBDC Studies)/letter about the proposed study or written confirmation from the PATH Study team indicating the availability of sufficient numbers of biospecimens. To obtain this documentation:
NBDC Studies: Interested applicants are strongly encouraged to explore available biospecimens and submit a Biospecimen Availability Inquiry via the NBDC Biobank portal at least 4 weeks prior to the submission deadline to determine whether there is a sufficient quantity of samples required for the proposed study and to determine whether the proposed use of samples is consistent with the limitations of the participant's informed consents. Applicants may apply for access to samples from multiple time-points if they are proposing a feasible longitudinal design and can demonstrate adequate storage capabilities. In response to the Biospecimen Availability Inquiry, a Resource Availability and Impact Report will be generated and uploaded to the Inquiry Dashboard, documenting if there is a sufficient quantity of the samples required for the proposed study, which will serve as supportive information for the application.
PATH Study: Interested applicants are strongly encouraged to explore available biospecimens and review the key steps in applying for biospecimens as described here: How to Apply for Biospecimens | NAHDAP. Briefly, applicants should review the PATH Study Biospecimen Access Program guidelines and submit a concept statement outlining the biospecimens of interest and a short description of the proposed study. The PATH Study Biospecimen Access Committee (BAC) will review the concept statement and evaluate the proposed study for feasibility, scope, and consistency with PATH Study objectives, and/or research priorities for tobacco regulatory science. If the proposed study is approved, the notification e-mail will include a letter which indicates that the requested biospecimens are available.
Funding Source (required):
NBDC: Applicants must identify the funding source and secured budget to be used for the proposed studies and include relevant documentation (e.g., Notice of Award). Include this as a PDF file labeled Funding Source
PATH Study: Applicants must identify the proposed funding source to be used for the research project (currently available or application in process), and include relevant documentation once available (e.g., Notice of Award). Include this as a PDF file labeled Funding Source
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Research Strategy
Significance: Explain how the proposed use of biospecimens relates to NBDC or PATH Study objectives, and how results will inform the scientific community, public health policy, child and adolescent health and/or tobacco regulation. The application must address the following:
Approach: Describe how your overall research strategy and use of specific methods and analyses will accomplish the specific aims of the study. The application must address the following:
Biospecimen Information: Briefly describe participant characteristics (variables) to define participant groups for source of biospecimens, as well as the type(s), numbers and volumes of samples being requested, and the collection timeframe for samples being requested, including a clear justification for each. This should match what was entered in the Biospecimen Availability Inquiry (NBDC) or PATH Study Concept Proposal.
Methodology/Assays:
List each laboratory assay planned for the biospecimens. Provide the following information for each assay:
Power and Effect Size:
Statistical Analyses:
Timeline:
Protection of Human Subjects:
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
Other Plan(s):
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply - Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:
If you answered "Yes" to the question "Are Human Subjects Involved?" on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.
Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Delayed Onset Study
Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Foreign (non-U.S.) organizations must follow policies described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, and procedures for foreign organizations described throughout the How to Apply Application Guide.
See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov
Part I. contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH's electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply – Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the How to Apply - Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organization's profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review, NIH. Applications that are incomplete or non-compliant will not be reviewed.
Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.
Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector Grant Self Disclosure Program at grantdisclosures@oig.hhs.gov.
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy
Send proof of secured, adequate funding to pathstudyteam@mail.nih.gov or nbdc_biobank@mail.nih.gov. Resources will not be released until proof of funding is provided.
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
For this particular NOFO, note the following:
The X01 Resource Access Program invites eligible institutions to seek access to NIH research resources, which are specified in each X01 NOFO. This includes programs where institutions will request access to submit to the resource (e.g., high throughput screening assays) as well as programs where access to a specific NIH research resource is needed to conduct certain research. Important factors in the peer review of X01 applications are the need for, and potential benefit of, gaining access to the resource, specifications for any assays proposed, timelines for completion and plans for follow-on studies.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? Is the prior research that serves as the key support for the proposed project rigorous? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?
Specific to this NOFO:
Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or those in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance, and organizational structure appropriate for the project?
Specific to this NOFO:
Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?
Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Have the investigators included plans to address weaknesses in the rigor of prior research that serves as the key support for the proposed project? Have the investigators presented strategies to ensure a robust and unbiased approach, as appropriate for the work proposed? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed? Have the investigators presented adequate plans to address relevant biological variables, such as sex, for studies in vertebrate animals or human subjects?
If the project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, are the plans to address 1) the protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion or exclusion of individuals of all ages (including children and older adults), justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?
Specific to this NOFO:
Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment, and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
This NOFO only accepts applications that do not propose clinical trials. Note: Applications may propose activities involving human subjects that are not deemed clinical trials.
When the proposed project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for inclusion. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research.
The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following three points: (1) a complete description of all proposed procedures including the species, strains, ages, sex, and total numbers of animals to be used; (2) justifications that the species is appropriate for the proposed research and why the research goals cannot be accomplished using an alternative non-animal model; and (3) interventions including analgesia, anesthesia, sedation, palliative care, and humane endpoints that will be used to limit any unavoidable discomfort, distress, pain and injury in the conduct of scientifically valuable research. Methods of euthanasia and justification for selected methods, if NOT consistent with the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, is also required but is found in a separate section of the application. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals Section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animals Section.
Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
For Resubmissions (as applicable), the committee will evaluate the application as now presented, taking into consideration the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group and changes made to the project.
For Renewals (as applicable), the committee will consider the progress made in the last funding period.
For Revisions (as applicable), the committee will consider the appropriateness of the proposed expansion of the scope of the project. If the Revision application relates to a specific line of investigation presented in the original application that was not recommended for approval by the committee, then the committee will consider whether the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group are adequate and whether substantial changes are clearly evident.
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Reviewers will assess whether the project presents special opportunities for furthering research programs through the use of unusual talent, resources, populations, or environmental conditions that exist in other countries and either are not readily available in the United States or augment existing U.S. resources.
Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Reviewers will comment on whether the Resource Sharing Plan(s) (e.g., Sharing Model Organisms) or the rationale for not sharing the resources, is reasonable.
For projects involving key biological and/or chemical resources, reviewers will comment on the brief plans proposed for identifying and ensuring the validity of those resources.
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
X01 applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an internal group convened by NIDA, using the above review criteria.
As part of the review, all applications will receive a written critique.
Requests for reconsideration of initial peer review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this NOFO.
As these X01 applications are reviewed internally, they will not undergo Advisory Council review. The following will be considered in making award decisions:
Prior to making an award, NIH reviews an applicant's federal award history in SAM.gov to ensure sound business practices. An applicant can review and comment on any information in the Responsibility/Qualification records available in SAM.gov. NIH will consider any comments by the applicant in the Responsibility/Qualification records in SAM.gov to ascertain the applicant's integrity, business ethics, and performance record of managing Federal awards per 2 CFR Part 200.206 "Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants." This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.4.4 Disposition of Applications.
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
An X01 does not result in a Notice of Award (NoA). Rather, selected applicants will receive access to resources described in this NOFO. Successful applicants will receive instructions for next steps.
Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Recipient institutions must ensure that protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the recipient must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.
An X01 does not result in a Notice of Award. Instead, successful applicants will receive instructions on accessing the resources described in this NOFO.
Pursuant to the Cybersecurity Act of 2015, Div. N, § 405, Pub. Law 114-113, 6 USC § 1533(d), the HHS Secretary has established a common set of voluntary, consensus-based, and industry-led guidelines, best practices, methodologies, procedures, and processes.
Successful recipients under this NOFO agree that:
When recipients, subrecipients, or third-party entities have:
Cybersecurity plans and procedures must at minimum include the following:
All activities proposed in your application and budget narrative must align with applicable law, including but not limited to statutes, executive orders, federal regulations and applicable judicial holdings. Accordingly, discretionary awards shall not be used to fund, promote, encourage, subsidize, or facilitate; racial preferences or other forms of racial discrimination by the recipient, including activities where race or intentional proxies for race will be used as a selection criterion for employment or program participation; denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans, or the belief that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic; illegal immigration; or any other initiatives that compromise public safety. If an application does not align, the application will not receive funding to the extent permitted by law and applicable court orders.
For applications involving substance abuse, the application must not support harm reduction. Please see Updated Funding Guidance for Recipients on Supplies and Services.
For applications involving funding Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) or medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), this funding should be used to provide comprehensive treatment and recovery support services rather than medication-only models for opioid use disorder. Services should include medications, where clinically indicated, in conjunction with psychosocial and other treatment and recovery support services. Funding can also be used to support individualized tapering and discontinuation of medications when clinically indicated. Please see Updated Funding Guidance for Recipients on MAT/MOUD.
As of October 1, 2025, HHS has adopted 2 CFR Part 200, with some modifications included in 2 CFR Part 300. These regulations replace those in 45 CFR Part 75. However, for NIH, under the Consolidated Appropriations Act for FY 2026, (P.L. 119-75, Division B, Title II, Sec. 224), the provisions relating to indirect costs in 45 CFR 75 continue to apply to NIH awards. Consistent with the statute, NIH will not apply updated thresholds outlined within 2 CFR Part 200, at this time.
In administering programs under this and all funding announcements, NIH prioritizes:
Not Applicable
A Data Management and Sharing (DMS) Plan is not applicable to this NOFO. An X01 does not result in a Notice of Award. Instead, successful applicants will receive instructions on accessing the resources described in this NOFO.
Not applicable. An X01 does not results in a Notice of Award. Instead, successful applicants will receive instructions on accessing the resources described in this NOFO.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
eRA Service Desk - Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, and post-submission issues.
Grants.gov Support Center - Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and services (e.g., Workspace, subscriptions).
NBDC Biospecimen Team: nbdc_biobank@mail.nih.gov
PATH Study Biospecimen Team: pathstudyteam@mail.nih.gov
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
NIAAA-ABCD@mail.nih.gov
National Institute of Neurological Disorders & Stroke (NINDS)
Email: NINDS-BRAC@ninds.nih.gov
Division of Translational Research (DTR)
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Email: DTRcommunications@nih.gov
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
Email: NIDCR-Program@nih.gov
Behavioral Research Program
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Email: NCIDCCPSBRPNOFOs@mail.nih.gov
NBDC Biospecimen Team
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Email: nbdc_biobank@mail.nih.gov
PATH Study Biospecimen Team
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Email: pathstudyteam@mail.nih.gov
Chief, Grants Management Officer
National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Email: nidagmbemail@nida.nih.gov
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
Grants Management Contact
Email: NIAAA-GMB@mail.nih.gov
Chief Grants Management Officer
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Email: ChiefGrantsManagementOfficer@ninds.nih.gov
Chief, Grants Management Office
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Email: NIMHNOFOGrantsManagement@mail.nih.gov
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
Email: deeranotifications@nidcr.nih.gov
Office of Grants Administration
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
E-mail: NCIFinancialContact@nih.gov
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 2 CFR Part 200.