National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health (OD)
National Eye Institute (NEI)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Division of Program Coordination, Planning and Strategic Initiatives, Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (ORIP)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
All applications to this funding opportunity announcement should fall within the mission of the Institutes/Centers. The following NIH Offices may co-fund applications assigned to those Institutes/Centers.
Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH)
SB1 Commercialization Readiness Program
See Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.
The Commercialization Readiness Pilot (CRP) program helps small business concerns (SBCs) move NIH-funded SBIR or STTR projects from late-stage development to commercialization. The CRP supports later-stage research and development (R&D) and/or technical assistance that Phase II and Phase IIB Strategic Breakthrough awards do not typically support. This includes:
SBCs may subcontract (outsource) a significant amount of the work in a CRP to meet the project goals.
NIH's mission is to seek fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems and the application of that knowledge to enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce illness and disability.
The goals of the agency are:
In realizing these goals, the NIH provides leadership and direction to programs designed to improve the health of the Nation by conducting and supporting research:
| Application Due Dates | Review and Award Cycles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New | Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed) | AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed | Scientific Merit Review | Advisory Council Review | Earliest Start Date |
| September 05, 2026 * | September 05, 2026 * | Not Applicable | November 2026 | January 2027 | April 2027 |
| January 05, 2027 * | January 05, 2027 * | Not Applicable | March 2027 | May 2027 | July 2027 |
| April 05, 2027 * | April 05, 2027 * | Not Applicable | July 2027 | August 2027 | December 2027 |
| September 05, 2027 * | September 05, 2027 * | Not Applicable | November 2027 | January 2028 | April 2028 |
| January 05, 2028 * | January 05, 2028 * | Not Applicable | March 2028 | May 2028 | July 2028 |
| April 05, 2028 * | April 05, 2028 * | Not Applicable | July 2028 | August 2028 | December 2028 |
| September 05, 2028 * | September 05, 2028 * | Not Applicable | November 2028 | January 2029 | April 2029 |
| January 05, 2029 * | January 05, 2029 * | Not Applicable | March 2029 | May 2029 | July 2029 |
| April 05, 2029 * | April 05, 2029 * | Not Applicable | July 2029 | August 2029 | December 2029 |
All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
No late applications will be accepted for this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO).
Not Applicable
It is critical that applicants follow the SBIR/STTR (B) Instructions in the How to Apply – Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).
Conformance to all requirements (both in the How to Apply – Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the How to Apply – Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the How to Apply – Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.
Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity.
The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs (also known as America's Seed Fund) are major sources of early-stage funding for U.S. technology development and commercialization. NIH SBIR and STTR awards support projects through multiple phases:
After Phase II, NIH expects small business concerns (SBCs) to fully commercialize the product or technology using non-SBIR/STTR funds (federal or non-federal). However, biomedical projects often need specialized studies or product development services (for example, market research) to commercialize or attract third-party investment. This additional work is often outsourced to contract research organizations (CROs).
Some NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices (ICOs) participate in the Phase IIB Strategic Breakthrough program PA-27-101, which provides a second Phase II award to help bridge this gap, but those awards limit the amount of work that can be outsourced and require matching funds.
What this NOFO Supports
The Commercialization Readiness Pilot (CRP) NOFO provides later-stage research and development and technical assistance to NIH SBIR or STTR Phase II recipients. The CRP program can support R&D that requires significant outsourcing and/or is needed during an active Phase II awards. This funding opportunity requires a prior (active or ended) NIH Phase II award. New SBIR Phase I and II grant applications should be submitted to PA-27-100 and STTR Phase I and II grant applications should be submitted to PA-27-102.
Phase II recipients that need significant R&D funding to bridge the gap between the SBIR or STTR Phase II award and commercialization should consider the Phase IIB Strategic Breakthrough. See PA-27-101. Applicants are strongly encouraged to contact program staff prior to applying to help choose the best funding opportunity for their project.
Note: This NOFO accepts New "Type 1" Applications from recipients of NIH SBIR or STTR Phase II awards or an NIH SBIR or STTR Phase IIB Strategic Breakthrough award.
SBCs must meet the eligibility requirements in Section III.
Scientific/Technical Scope
SBCs may propose to do technical assistance, later-stage R&D activities, or both in the application.
Applications from eligible United States SBCs should propose a technical assistance and/or a R&D study that contributes to the missions of any NIH components participating in this NOFO. See NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices and Small Business Funding Considerations and Contacts for Institute, Center, and Office (ICO) specific missions, interest areas, funding priorities, and funding considerations.
Some examples of activities within scope include (but are not limited to):
Technical Assistance:
Late Stage Research and Development Activities:
Outsourcing and project oversight
Applicants may outsource a significant portion of CRP work. The expert services should fit the work proposed and be well justified in the application. The SBC must perform a substantial role in oversight and management of the proposed work, which should be reflected in the budget. This includes appropriate oversight of all scientific, programmatic, financial, and administrative matters related to the grant.
Costs and requests not allowed
Further information about the CRP program can be found at https://seed.nih.gov. Frequently asked questions are available to assist applicants and can answer many basic questions about the program.
Investigators proposing NIH-defined clinical trials may refer to the Research Methods Resources website for information about developing statistical methods and study designs.
Applications Not Responsive to this NOFO
The following types of applications are not responsive to this NOFO and will not be reviewed:
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Grant: A financial assistance mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity.
The OER Glossary and the How to Apply – Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for the NOFO.
Need help determining whether you are doing a clinical trial?
Not all participating Institutes and Centers accept clinical trials under this NOFO. See "Applications Not Responsive to this NOFO" information in Section 1. Notice of Funding Opportunity Description.
The number of awards is contingent upon NIH appropriations and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.
Total funding support (direct costs, indirect costs, fee) may not exceed the SBA budgetary limits for the Commercialization Readiness Pilot (CRP) program. Budget guidelines vary by participating component and may be lower than the SBA budgetary limits. Total funding support normally may not exceed the guidelines in the table below.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to contact program officials prior to submitting any application and early in the application planning process. See NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices for Institute, Center, and Office (ICO) specific missions, interest areas, funding priorities, and funding considerations. In all cases, applicants should propose a budget that is reasonable and appropriate for completion of the research project.
| Institute or Center | CRP Budget |
| National Cancer Institute | SBA Guideline |
| National Eye Institute | $500,000.00 |
| National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute | $500,000.00 |
| National Human Genome Research Institute | $500,000.00 |
| National Institute on Aging | SBA Guideline |
| National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism | SBA Guideline |
| National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases | $2,000,000.00 |
| National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases | $2,000,000.00 |
| National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering | $500,000.00 |
| Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development | $2,000,000.00 |
| National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders | $2,000,000.00 |
| National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research | SBA Guideline |
| National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases | $2,000,000.00 |
| National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences | $500,000.00 |
| National Institute of General Medical Sciences | SBA Guideline |
| National Institute of Mental Health | SBA Guideline |
| National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke | $2,000,000.00 |
| National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities | SBA Guideline |
| National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences | $500,000.00 |
| Division of Program Coordination, Planning and Strategic Initiatives, Office of Research Infrastructure Programs | $2,000,000.00 |
| Office of Research on Women's Health | SBA Guideline |
The scope of the proposed project should determine the project period. The maximum project period allowed is 3 years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.
Only United States small business concerns (SBCs) that have had an active NIH SBIR or STTR Phase II or Phase IIB contract, grant or cooperative agreement from NIH within the last 36 months are eligible to submit applications for this opportunity. Only one CRP award is allowed per project. SBCs with currently active and newly awarded Phase II or Phase IIB awards from one of the participating ICs are also eligible to submit applications for this opportunity. A small business concern is one that, at the time of award of Phase I and Phase II, meets all of the following criteria:
If the concern is more than 50% owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, private equity firms, or any combination of these falls under 3 (b) or 3 (c) above, see Section IV. Application and Submission Information for additional instructions regarding required application certification.
If an Employee Stock Ownership Plan owns all or part of the concern, each stock trustee and plan member is considered an owner.
If a trust owns all or part of the concern, each trustee and trust beneficiary is considered an owner.
Definitions:
SBCs must also meet the other regulatory requirements found in 13 C.F.R. Part 121. Business concerns, other than investment companies licensed, or state development companies qualifying under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, 15 U.S.C. 661, et seq., are affiliates of one another when either directly or indirectly, (a) one concern controls or has the power to control the other; or (b) a third-party/parties controls or has the power to control both. Business concerns include, but are not limited to, any individual (sole proprietorship) partnership, corporation, joint venture, association, or cooperative. The How to Apply – Application Guide should be referenced for detailed eligibility information.
Phase I to Phase II Transition Rate Benchmark: In accordance with guidance from the SBA, the HHS SBIR/STTR Program is implementing the Phase I to Phase II Transition Rate benchmark required by the SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011 and the SBIR and STTR Extension Act of 2022.The benchmark establishes a minimum number of Phase II awards the company must have received relative to a given number of Phase I awards received during the 5-fiscal year time period. The Transition Rate is calculated as the total number of SBIR and STTR Phase II awards a company received during the past 5 fiscal years divided by the total number of SBIR and STTR Phase I awards it received during the past 5 fiscal years excluding the most recently completed year. The Transition Rate requirement, agreed upon and established by all 11 SBIR agencies, was published for public comment in a Federal Register Notice on October 16, 2012 (77 FR 63410) and amended on May 23, 2013 (78 FR 30951).
On June 1 of each year, SBA will identify the companies that fail to meet minimum performance requirements. SBA calculates individual company Phase I to Phase II Transition Rates using SBIR and STTR award information across all federal agencies. SBA will notify companies and the relevant officials at the participating agencies. More information on the Phase I to Phase II Transition Rate requirement is available at SBIR.gov.
Phase II to Commercialization Benchmark: In accordance with guidance from the SBA, the HHS SBIR/STTR Programs are implementing the Phase II to Commercialization Rate benchmark for Phase I applicants, as required by the SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011 and the SBIR and STTR Extension Act of 2022. The Commercialization Rate Benchmark was published in a Federal Register notice on August 8, 2013 (78 FR 48537), with a reopening of the comment period published on September 26, 2013 (78 FR 59410).
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Unfunded international collaborations or unfunded foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, may be allowed.
NIH will no longer issue awards (i.e., new, renewal, or non-competing continuation) to domestic or foreign entities that involve foreign subawards/subcontracts. All NIH-funded research involving foreign subawards/subcontracts must be submitted in response to a NOFO that is specifically designated for funded international collaborations. See NIH Grants Policy Statement 16.8 Collaborative International Research Awards.
Applications involving foreign subawards/subcontracts submitted in response to this NOFO will be deemed noncompliant and will not be considered for funding. This policy applies to all monetary international collaborations resulting in foreign subawards/subcontracts, however, it does not preclude unfunded international collaborations or foreign components, funding for foreign consultants, or procurement of unique equipment or supplies from foreign vendors.
Applicant Organizations
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply – Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference NIH Grants Policy Statement 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information.
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
All PD(s)/PI(s) must be registered with ORCID. The personal profile associated with the PD(s)/PI(s) eRA Commons account must be linked to a valid ORCID ID. For more information on linking an ORCID ID to an eRA Commons personal profile see the ORCID topic in our eRA Commons online help.
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with his/her organization to develop an application for support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
Under the SBIR program, for both Phase I and Phase II, the primary employment of the PD/PI must be with the small business concern at the time of award and during the conduct of the proposed project. For projects with multiple PDs/PIs, at least one must meet the primary employment requirement. Occasionally, deviations from this requirement may occur.
The How to Apply – Application Guide should be referenced for specific details on eligibility requirements. For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, see Multiple Principal Investigators section of the How to Apply – Application Guide.
This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.
NIH will not accept similar grant applications with essentially the same research focus from the same applicant organization. This includes derivative or multiple applications that propose to develop a single product or service that, with non-substantive modifications, can be applied to a variety of purposes. Applicants may not simultaneously submit identical/essentially identical applications under both this funding opportunity and any other HHS funding opportunity, including the SBIR and STTR Parent announcements.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, NIH Grants Policy Statement 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:
NIH will accept Phase IIB and CRP applications for the same Phase II project concurrently, i.e. Phase IIB and CRP applications for the same Phase II project may be under review at the same time only if they are scientifically distinct.
A small business concern (SBC) may subcontract a substantial portion of its CRP award to third parties through consultant and contractual arrangements. The SBC must perform a substantive role in planned research and not merely serve as a conduit of funds to another party or parties. At minimum (depending on the nature of out-sourced effort), this includes being able to provide appropriate oversight of all scientific, programmatic, financial, and administrative matters related to the grant.
A small business concern may subcontract a portion of its SBIR award to a Federal laboratory within the limits above. A Federal laboratory, as defined in 15 U.S.C. § 3703, means any laboratory, any federally funded research and development center, or any center established under 15 U.S.C. §§ 3705 & 3707 that is owned, leased, or otherwise used by a Federal agency and funded by the Federal Government, whether operated by the Government or by a contractor.
The basis for determining the percentage of work to be performed by each of the cooperative parties in Phase I or Phase II will be the total of the requested costs attributable to each party, unless otherwise described and justified in "Consortium/Contractual Arrangements" of the PHS 398 Research Plan component of SF424 (R&R) application forms.
Additional details are contained in the How to Apply – Application Guide.
The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
It is critical that applicants follow the SBIR/STTR (B) Instructions in the How to Apply – Application Guide, except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise (in this NOFO, in a policy notice, or other notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to the requirements in the How to Apply – Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
All page limitations described in the How to Apply – Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply – Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.
All instructions in the How to Apply – Application Guide must be followed.
Federal Identifier:
For applications where the SBIR/STTR Phase II or Phase IIB award is a grant: Enter the Federal Identifier of the Phase II or Phase IIB award (e.g., use CA987654 for 2R44CA987654-03A1).
For applications where the SBIR/STTR Phase II or Phase IIB award is a contract: The Federal Identifier will be the awarding IC code, followed by six 0s. (e.g. if NIAID was the awarding institute, use AI000000).
Please note: Applicants with Phase II or IIB Contracts must contact their program officer prior to application and should note the contract number in a cover letter.
Applications that do not include a valid identifier may be administratively withdrawn.
Type of Application:
Check "New" if this is a first submission to this NOFO, or in accordance with other submission policies. NIH will accept a new CRP (A0) application following an unsuccessful resubmission (A1) application or a prior A0 application.
Check "Resubmission" if the application is a resubmission of an application submitted to this NOFO or previous CRP funding opportunities.
Please note: Only those applicants who have received Phase II or Phase IIB funding from NIH within the last 36 months are eligible for this program, as described in Section III.1
Renewal Applications will not be accepted for this NOFO.
All instructions in the How to Apply – Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply – Application Guide must be followed.
Other Attachments:
1. SBIR Application Certification for small business concerns majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms
Applicant small business concerns that are majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms (e.g. majority VCOC-owned) are required to submit a Certification at time of their application submission per the SBIR and STTR Policy Directive. Follow the instructions below.
Applicants small business concerns who are more than 50% directly owned and controlled by one or more individuals (who are citizens or permanent resident aliens of the United States), other business concerns (each of which is more than 50% directly owned and controlled by individuals who are citizens or permanent resident aliens of the United States), or any combination of these (i.e. NOT majority VCOC-owned) should NOT fill out this certification and should NOT attach it to their application package.
2. Regulatory Plan (Required, 2-Page Maximum)
Name the PDF attachment "RegulatoryPlan.pdf" and attach it in the Other Attachments Section of the "Research and Related Other Project Information" form.
Applicants must provide a regulatory plan describing the regulatory pathway that is being or will be pursued and a timeline for achieving regulatory approval with discrete milestones. At minimum, the plan should address regulatory requirements, but a discussion of requirements for Marketing Approval is strongly encouraged. If the proposed product does not require regulatory or marketing approval, applicants should provide rationale for that determination.
If regulatory or marketing approval is required, applicants should provide details of their interaction with the appropriate regulatory authorities in the description of their Regulatory Plan. This should include the regulatory authority contact and date of interaction. Applicants should describe any outside assistance they have obtained or plan to obtain for developing and achieving the proposed Regulatory Plan.
Please note: Applicants may be required to submit evidence that they have contacted the regulatory authority and that their research plan and objectives follow the relevant requirements or guidance of that authority. This documentation (letters, emails and minutes) is NOT submitted with the application but must be furnished upon request of the NIH awarding component. Examples that provide evidence of appropriate interactions are letters or emails between the company and the appropriate FDA (or other regulatory authority) personnel, meeting minutes clarifying the evidentiary requirements to support clinical development or a marketing application or documentation of IRB determination of non-significant risk.
All instructions in the How to Apply – Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply – Application Guide must be followed.
The following additional instructions apply:
Filing fees associated with patents or FDA submissions are not permissible.
The SBC must perform a substantive role in the conduct of the planned research and not merely serve as a conduit of funds to another party or parties. This includes (at minimum) being able to provide appropriate oversight of all scientific, programmatic, financial, and administrative matters related to the grant. Applicants are expected to detail their proposed collaborations as part of the grant application.
CRP applications cannot include separate Technical and Business Assistance (TABA) funding.
All instructions in the How to Apply – Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply – Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply – Application Guide must be followed.
The following additional instructions apply:
Specific Aims: If requesting technical assistance, state concisely and realistically what the proposed technical assistance is intended to accomplish for the product under development. A scientific hypothesis is not required.
Research Strategy:
Significance
Explain how the proposed project will lead to a marketable product, process, or service. Describe the unmet need(s) being addressed, including the market segment(s) and customers for the product/technology.
Briefly describe the competitive environment and how the proposed project would provide a benefit over existing products and services. Discuss how the proposed project relates to other development efforts underway in academia and industry.
Describe the hurdles that may delay or prevent acceptance of the product.
Innovation
Describe how the product being developed is novel to the field of research or clinical practice and/or how it will shift current research or clinical practice paradigms.
Describe the advantage that the proposed product offers over all existing approaches, as well as those in development or early generations.
Approach
Describe the technical assistance to be used to accomplish the specific aims of the project. Provide a tentative timetable for the project.
Describe how the successful completion of the aims will advance the product/technology toward commercialization.
Describe quantitative milestones to be used for measuring success in achieving each of the research plan's objectives.
If the proposed project involves advancing the product/technology through the federal regulatory approval process, include a proposed plan to meet the requirements or a clear indication when the plan will be developed.
CRP Progress Report (required for all applicants)
Concisely describe the development status of the underlying technology and commercialization progress to date. Discuss how past and ongoing activities (including those beyond the scope of the Phase II project) mitigate commercialization risk and enable third party investment at any point in the development timeline for the proposed product, process or service. Examples of activities may include, but are not limited to validation studies, regulatory compliance, patents and license agreements, IND/IDE-enabling studies, and pre-market submissions.
Letters of Support: In addition to standard letters of support documenting collaborations and access to expertise or unique research resources, applicants should include letters of support documenting commitments from third-party investors to support the Fundraising Plan section if applicable.
Resource Sharing Plans:
Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
Other Plan(s):
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Appendix:
Only limited items are allowed in the Appendix of other small business applications. The instructions for the Appendix of the Research Plan are described in the How to Apply - Application Guide; any instructions provided here are in addition to the How to Apply - Application Guide Instructions.
Applicants should include quotes for outsourced services they plan to use if applicable.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Program Type: Check "SBIR" regardless of whether the Phase II or IIB predicating the CRP application was a SBIR or STTR award.
Application Type: Check "Commercialization Readiness Program"
Question 7: Answer "No." Separate TABA funding may not be requested by CRP applicants.
Commercialization Plan:
All applicants are expected to describe a realistic plan (extending beyond the CRP), which outlines how and when full commercialization can be accomplished. The full commercialization of the product/technology should be carried out with non-SBIR funds.
The following subsections with the headings should be included within the Commercialization Plan, in addition to the requirements listed in the SF424 Application Guide:
Statement of Need
Applicants must provide a concise "Statement of Need". This statement is expected to provide answers to the questions listed below:
What is the perceived "Valley of Death" for the product/technology under development?
Why is additional government funding critically needed to accelerate the development of the product or technology toward commercialization? Specifically, what activities are being proposed under this NOFO that would not otherwise be possible through independent third-party investments OR would be significantly delayed without additional NIH support?
To what extent would a possible award under this NOFO advance the product or technology far enough to attract sufficient, independent third-party financing and/or strategic partnerships to carry out full commercialization?
SBIR/STTR Commercialization History
Applicants should provide an SBIR/STTR Commercialization History that addresses the questions listed below. The following questions should be addressed for all SBIR/STTR awards received from any federal agency:
Has the company gone through any name changes within the past five years? If so, then all previous company names should be listed in the application.
Is the company a subsidiary or a spin-off? If so, then the name of the parent company should be provided.
What percentage of the company's revenue was derived from SBIR/STTR funding during each of the past 5 years, including both Phase I and Phase II awards? Applicants should report a percentage value for each year individually.
What is the total number of SBIR/STTR Phase II awards that the company has received from the federal government (as reported in Question 9 of the SBIR/STTR Information Form).
What are the total revenues that have been generated to date as a result of the commercialization of the SBIR/STTR projects funded within the past 5 years?
Project Management Plan
Applicants must provide a Project Management Plan detailing how the research and commercialization plans will be kept on track. The plan should include specific milestones for the commercialization of the product. Applicants should include a commercialization timeline including the CRP project aims and key milestones.
Fundraising Plan
The NIH considers the raising of independent third-party investor funds to be an important means to facilitate and accelerate the capital-intensive steps that are required to commercialize new products/technologies emerging from NIH-funded SBIR/STTR Phase II projects. Applicants are expected to provide a Fundraising Plan, which should be a detailed and specific plan for securing substantial, independent third-party investor funds if they are necessary to bring the product to commercialization. If they are not needed, the company should detail how they are able to bring the technology to market without the use of third-party investor funds.
SBIR-Specific Questions:
Answers to questions 9 and 10 of the SBIR/STTR Information form are specific to the SBIR program. If the applicant has received SBIR/STTR awards issued by NIH or any other federal government agency, attach a file that includes for each SBIR/STTR award: (1) name of awarding agency; (2) award number and date; (3) amount of award; (4) title of project; (5) source, date, and amount of Phase III funding agreement; and (6) commercialization status of each Phase II award.
When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply - Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:
If you answered "Yes" to the question "Are Human Subjects Involved?" on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.
Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Delayed Onset Study
Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov.
Part I. contains information about Key Dates and time. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH's electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply – Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH.
The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organization's profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by components of participating organizations, NIH. Applications that are incomplete, non-compliant and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.
Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector Grant Self Disclosure Program at grantdisclosures@oig.hhs.gov.
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy.
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
For this particular NOFO, note the following:
The Commercialization Readiness Pilot (CRP) program is intended to support projects of varying scale to achieve the specific objectives of participating institutes and centers. Reviewers should be careful to consider the merits of the proposal with respect to the scope of work proposed when evaluating its overall impact.
A proposed Clinical Trial application may include study design, methods, and intervention that are not by themselves innovative but address important questions or unmet needs. Additionally, the results of the clinical trial may indicate that further clinical development of the intervention is unwarranted or lead to new avenues of scientific investigation.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the relevant market offering, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below, as appropriate for the stage of research, in the determination of scientific merit, and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific and commercial impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? Does the project address an important problem in the field? Is the prior research that serves as the key support for the proposed project rigorous? How will successful completion of the project change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field? Does the proposed project have commercial potential to lead to a marketable product, process or service? (Does the Commercialization Plan demonstrate a high probability of commercialization?)
To the extent appropriate for the maturity of this project: How compelling is the value proposition, and to what extent does the application demonstrate a substantial market-pull for the technology under development? How well has the applicant described the market segment(s) and customers for the product/ technology, and how urgent is the unmet need(s) being addressed? How well has the applicant demonstrated an understanding of the competitive environment in which they plan to sell their product? To what extent has the applicant demonstrated a clear understanding of customer needs? How well has the company addressed potential hurdles that may delay or prevent acceptance of their product?
In addition, for applications involving clinical trials
Are the scientific rationale and need for a clinical trial to test the proposed hypothesis or intervention well supported by preliminary data, clinical and/or preclinical studies, or information in the literature or knowledge of biological mechanisms? For trials focusing on clinical or public health endpoints, is this clinical trial necessary for testing the safety, efficacy or effectiveness of an intervention that could lead to a change in clinical practice, community behaviors or health care policy? For trials focusing on mechanistic, behavioral, physiological, biochemical, or other biomedical endpoints, is this trial needed to advance scientific understanding?
Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project? To what extent do the prior experience and qualifications of the project team members lend confidence that the team will be successful in commercializing the proposed product/technology? For example, how successful have the PD(s)/PI(s) been in commercializing technologies and discoveries in the past? If applicable, is the Contract Research Organization (CRO) or other technical assistance provider qualified to provide the services proposed? Does the application indicate robust oversight of CROs/service providers and a clear means to integrate their effort into the Applicant SBC's commercialization process?
In addition, for applications involving clinical trials
With regard to the proposed leadership for the project, do the PD/PI(s) and key personnel have the expertise, experience, and ability to organize, manage and implement the proposed clinical trial and meet milestones and timelines? Do they have appropriate expertise in study coordination, data management and statistics? For a multicenter trial, is the organizational structure appropriate and does the application identify a core of potential center investigators and staffing for a coordinating center?
Is the product being developed novel to the field of research or clinical practice? Will the proposed product under development shift current research, treatment or clinical practice paradigms? Is the product substantially innovative compared to all existing approaches as well as those in development? If the proposed product is trying to improve over early generations that may or may not have been marketed, are the potential advantages truly substantial?
In addition, for applications involving clinical trials
Does the design/research plan include innovative elements, as appropriate, that enhance its sensitivity, potential for information or potential to advance scientific knowledge or clinical practice?
Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Have the investigators included plans to address weaknesses in the rigor of prior research that serves as the key support for the proposed project? Have the investigators presented strategies to ensure a robust and unbiased approach, as appropriate for the work proposed? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? How appropriate are the proposed milestones in determining whether the recipient has successfully reached the specified goals (e.g., IND filing)? Does the application contain a detailed, feasible Project Management Plan?
How sound is the proposed Regulatory Plan to meet Federal regulatory requirements?
If the project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, are the plans to address:
1) the protection of human subjects from research risks, and
2) as required by statute, inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion or exclusion of individuals of all ages (including children and older adults), justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?
In addition, for applications involving clinical trials
Does the application adequately address the following, if applicable:
Study Design
Is the study design justified and appropriate to address primary and secondary outcome variable(s)/endpoints that will be clear, informative and relevant to the hypothesis being tested? Is the scientific rationale/premise of the study based on previously well-designed preclinical and/or clinical research? Given the methods used to assign participants and deliver interventions, is the study design adequately powered to answer the research question(s), test the proposed hypothesis/hypotheses, and provide interpretable results? Is the trial appropriately designed to conduct the research efficiently? Are the study populations (size, sex, age, demographic group), proposed intervention arms/dose, and duration of the trial, appropriate and well justified?
Are potential ethical issues adequately addressed? Is the process for obtaining informed consent or assent appropriate? Is the eligible population available? Are the plans for recruitment outreach, enrollment, retention, handling dropouts, missed visits, and losses to follow-up appropriate to ensure robust data collection? Are the planned recruitment timelines feasible and is the plan to monitor accrual adequate? Has the need for randomization (or not), masking (if appropriate), controls, and inclusion/exclusion criteria been addressed? Are differences addressed, if applicable, in the intervention effect due to sex and race/ethnicity?
Are the plans to standardize, assure quality of, and monitor adherence to, the trial protocol and data collection or distribution guidelines appropriate? Is there a plan to obtain required study agent(s)? Does the application propose to use existing available resources, as applicable?
Data Management and Statistical Analysis
Are planned analyses and statistical approach appropriate for the proposed study design and methods used to assign participants and deliver interventions? Are the procedures for data management and quality control of data adequate at clinical site(s) or at center laboratories, as applicable? Have the methods for standardization of procedures for data management to assess the effect of the intervention and quality control been addressed? Is there a plan to complete data analysis within the proposed period of the award?
Have necessary agreements with participating industry partners, if necessary, been established? Is there documentation of the commitment of any subcontractors and consultants as well as service agreements for personnel and facilities? To what extent does the applicant SBC have the resources available to address regulatory issues (if applicable), either through their own staff members or through appropriate arrangements with external regulatory consultants? How well can the applicant SBC sustain itself and grow as a business, providing the appropriate environment for the project to succeed? If the SBC has received previous SBIR/STTR funding from ANY federal agency, then how successful is the company's track record in commercializing prior SBIR/STTR projects?
In addition, for applications involving clinical trials
If proposed, are the administrative, data coordinating, enrollment and laboratory/testing centers, appropriate for the trial proposed?
Does the application adequately address the capability and ability to conduct the trial at the proposed site(s) or centers? Are the plans to add or drop enrollment centers, as needed, appropriate?
If international site(s) is/are proposed, does the application adequately address the complexity of executing the clinical trial?
If multi-sites/centers, is there evidence of the ability of the individual site or center to: (1) enroll the proposed numbers; (2) adhere to the protocol; (3) collect and transmit data in an accurate and timely fashion; and, (4) operate within the proposed organizational structure?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
Specific to applications involving clinical trials
Is the study timeline described in detail, taking into account start-up activities, the anticipated rate of enrollment, and planned follow-up assessment? Is the projected timeline feasible and well justified? Does the project incorporate efficiencies and utilize existing resources (e.g., CTSAs, practice-based research networks, electronic medical records, administrative database, or patient registries) to increase the efficiency of participant enrollment and data collection, as appropriate?
Are potential challenges and corresponding solutions discussed (e.g., strategies that can be implemented in the event of enrollment shortfalls)?
To what extent in the commercialization plan has the applicant identified realistic, market-based milestones that can be achieved over the next five years? How reasonable are the applicant's plans for generating a revenue stream, and how realistic are the revenue projections? How strong is the applicant's intellectual property (IP) portfolio/position (pertinent to the proposed project)?
Does the application address the current private-sector landscape in the proposed technical area? Does the application explain how the project differs from or complements existing commercial activity? For applications that duplicate well-funded private development, does the application justify why federal support is needed despite existing private investment?
Fundraising Plan
To what extent will the applicant's business alliances and/or corporate partnerships help in facilitating commercialization? For example, will third-party investors play an active role in facilitating the commercialization of the product/technology, and if so to what extent? If third-party investor funds are not needed, how well does the application support the ability of the SBC to bring the technology to market? If third-party investor funds are needed, how well does the application support the ability of the SBC to secure substantial independent third-party investor funds (i.e., third-party funds that equal or exceed the requested NIH funds)?:
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following three points: (1) a complete description of all proposed procedures including the species, strains, ages, sex, and total numbers of animals to be used; (2) justifications that the species is appropriate for the proposed research and why the research goals cannot be accomplished using an alternative non-animal model; and (3) interventions including analgesia, anesthesia, sedation, palliative care, and humane endpoints that will be used to limit any unavoidable discomfort, distress, pain and injury in the conduct of scientifically valuable research. Methods of euthanasia and justification for selected methods, if NOT consistent with the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, is also required but is found in a separate section of the application. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals Section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animals Section.
Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
For Resubmissions (as applicable), the committee will evaluate the application as now presented, taking into consideration the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group and changes made to the project.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable.
Do the activities provided in the progress report demonstrate progress toward mitigating commercialization risk and/or attracting third party investors in the proposed development timeline for the technology or product? Do the relevant concurrent and past activities provide a solid foundation for the proposed CRP activity and justify continuation of development efforts?
When the proposed project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for inclusion. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research.
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Not Applicable
Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Reviewers will comment on whether the Resource Sharing Plan(s) (e.g., Sharing Model Organisms) or the rationale for not sharing the resources, is reasonable.
For projects involving key biological and/or chemical resources, reviewers will comment on the brief plans proposed for identifying and ensuring the validity of those resources.
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by the Center for Scientific Review (CSR), in accordance with NIH peer review policies and practices, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will receive a written critique.
Applications may undergo a committee process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.
Applications will be assigned on the basis of established PHS referral guidelines to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the appropriate national Advisory Council or Board. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
See the NIH Director's Statement of Priorities (https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/nih-director/statements/advancing-nihs-mission-through-unified-strategy), entitled "Advancing NIH's Mission Through a Unified Strategy."
Applicants and recipients are encouraged to also refer to the Make Our Children Healthy Again Strategy (https://www.whitehouse.gov/maha/) when structuring their applications.
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.5.1. Just-in-Time Procedures. This request is not a Notice of Award nor should it be construed to be an indicator of possible funding.
Prior to making an award, NIH reviews an applicant's federal award history in SAM.gov to ensure sound business practices. An applicant can review and comment on any information in the Responsibility/Qualification records available in SAM.gov. NIH will consider any comments by the applicant in the Responsibility/Qualification records in SAM.gov to ascertain the applicant's integrity, business ethics, and performance record of managing Federal awards per 2 CFR Part 200.206 "Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants." This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
Disclosure Requirements Regarding Ties to Foreign Countries
SBIR and STTR applicants under consideration for award will be required to submit the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Required Disclosures of Foreign Affiliations or Relationships to Foreign Countries form (referred to as the "Disclosure Form" hereafter), during the JIT process. Applicants are required to disclose all funded and unfunded relationships with foreign countries, using the Disclosure Form, for all owners and covered individuals. "Covered individual" means an individual who-
(A) contributes in a substantive, meaningful way to the scientific development or execution of a research and development project proposed to be carried out with a research and development award from a Federal research agency; or
(B) is identified by the small business in the application as senior key personnel (i.e., individuals who contribute to the scientific development or execution of a project in a substantive, measurable way).
Upon request, applicants must submit the completed Disclosure Form and any additional agency-specific information electronically in eRA Commons via the Just-In-Time (JIT) process as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.5.1. Applicants must continue to comply with NIH Other Support disclosure requirements as provided in NIH GPS Section 2.5.1 and may be required to provide similar information on the Disclosure Form for covered individuals identified in the application. Applicants that fail to submit a completed Disclosure Form during the JIT process will not be considered for funding.
Denial of Awards
Applicants are encouraged to consider whether their entity's relationships with foreign countries of concern will pose a security risk. HHS cannot make an award under the SBIR or STTR program if it is determined that the small business concern submitting the proposal or application has any of the following:
If an award cannot be made due to a security risk, HHS will advise the small business concern that a security risk was found that required a denial of award and indicate which category listed above necessitated the denial.
NIH, CDC, and FDA will not provide applicants the opportunity to address any identified security risks prior to award.
Receipt of an award decision denying an application due to an identified security risk does not prohibit the small business concern from being eligible for an award in a subsequent award cycle.
After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access their Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.4.4 Disposition of Applications.
A Notice of Award (NoA) is the official authorizing document notifying the applicant that an award has been made and that funds may be requested from the designated HHS payment system or office. The NoA is signed by the Grants Management Officer and emailed to the recipient's business official.
In accepting the award, the recipient agrees that any activities under the award are subject to all provisions currently in effect or implemented during the period of the award, other Department regulations and policies in effect at the time of the award, and applicable statutory provisions.
Recipients must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.6. Funding Restrictions. Any pre-award costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the applicant's own risk. For more information on the Notice of Award, please refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 5. The Notice of Award and NIH Grants & Funding website, see Award Process.
Individual awards are based on the application submitted to, and as approved by, the NIH and are subject to the IC-specific terms and conditions identified in the NoA.
ClinicalTrials.gov: If an award provides for one or more clinical trials. By law (Title VIII, Section 801 of Public Law 110-85), the "responsible party" must register and submit results information for certain "applicable clinical trials" on the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System Information Website (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov). NIH expects registration and results reporting of all trials whether required under the law or not. For more information, see https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/reporting/index.htm
Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Recipient institutions must ensure that all protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the recipient must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.
Data and Safety Monitoring Requirements: The NIH policy for data and safety monitoring requires oversight and monitoring of all NIH-conducted or -supported human biomedical and behavioral intervention studies (clinical trials) to ensure the safety of participants and the validity and integrity of the data. Further information concerning these requirements is found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/hs/data_safety.htm and in the application instructions (SF424 (R&R) and PHS 398).
Investigational New Drug or Investigational Device Exemption Requirements: Consistent with federal regulations, clinical research projects involving the use of investigational therapeutics, vaccines, or other medical interventions (including licensed products and devices for a purpose other than that for which they were licensed) in humans under a research protocol must be performed under a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational new drug (IND) or investigational device exemption (IDE).
The following Federal wide and HHS-specific policy requirements apply to awards funded through NIH:
All federal statutes and regulations relevant to federal financial assistance, including those highlighted in NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4 Public Policy Requirements, Objectives and Other Appropriation Mandates.
By applying for or accepting federal funds from HHS, recipients certify compliance with all federal antidiscrimination laws and these requirements and that complying with those laws is a material condition of receiving federal funding streams. Recipients are responsible for ensuring subrecipients, contractors, and partners also comply.
Applicants and recipients are strongly encouraged to refer to the NIH Director's Statement of Priorities, entitled "Advancing NIH's Mission Through a Unified Strategy."
Recipients are responsible for ensuring that their activities comply with all applicable federal regulations. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.340, by accepting an NIH award, the recipient agrees that continued funding for the award is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds, recipient satisfactory performance, compliance with the Terms and Conditions of the award, and may also otherwise be terminated, to the extent authorized by law, if the agency determines that the award no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities, in line with 2 CFR 200.340(a)(4).
Pursuant to the Cybersecurity Act of 2015, Div. N, § 405, Pub. Law 114-113, 6 USC § 1533(d), the HHS Secretary has established a common set of voluntary, consensus-based, and industry-led guidelines, best practices, methodologies, procedures, and processes.
Successful recipients under this NOFO agree that:
When recipients, subrecipients, or third-party entities have:
Cybersecurity plans and procedures must at minimum include the following:
All activities proposed in your application and budget narrative must align with applicable law, including but not limited to statutes, executive orders, federal regulations and applicable judicial holdings. Accordingly, discretionary awards shall not be used to fund, promote, encourage, subsidize, or facilitate; racial preferences or other forms of racial discrimination by the recipient, including activities where race or intentional proxies for race will be used as a selection criterion for employment or program participation; denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans, or the belief that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic; illegal immigration; or any other initiatives that compromise public safety. If an application does not align, the application will not receive funding to the extent permitted by law and applicable court orders.
As of October 1, 2025, HHS has adopted 2 CFR Part 200, with some modifications included in 2 CFR Part 300. These regulations replace those in 45 CFR Part 75. However, for NIH, under the Consolidated Appropriations Act for FY 2026, (P.L. 119-75, Division B, Title II, Sec. 224), the provisions relating to indirect costs in 45 CFR 75 continue to apply to NIH awards. Consistent with the statute, NIH will not apply updated thresholds outlined within 2 CFR Part 200, at this time.
For applications involving substance abuse, the application must not support harm reduction. Please see Updated Funding Guidance for Recipients on Supplies and Services.
The Office of Inspector General Hotline accepts tips from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse and mismanagement in Department of Health & Human Services programs. The reporting individual should indicate that the fraud, waste and/or abuse concerns an SBIR/STTR grant or contract, if relevant. Report Fraud.
Not Applicable
SBIR and STTR recipients may retain the rights to data generated during the performance of an SBIR or STTR award for up to 20 years after the award date, per the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program Policy Directive. Further information about SBIR and STTR data rights are enumerated in the Grants Policy Statement Section 18.5.5.2 Intellectual property. Data Management and Sharing Plan is not applicable for this NOFO.
When multiple years are involved, recipients will be required to submit the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.4.1 Reporting. To learn more about post-award monitoring and reporting, see the NIH Grants & Funding website, see Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting.
NIH requires that SBIR/STTR recipients submit the following reports within 120 days of the end of the grant budget period unless the recipient is under an extension.
Failure to submit timely final reports may affect future funding to the organization or awards with the same PD/PI.NIH NOFOs outline intended research goals and objectives. Post award, NIH will review and measure performance based on the details and outcomes that are shared within the RPPR, as described at 2 CFR 200.301.
Disclosure of Foreign Relationships Reporting Requirements
Recipients are responsible for monitoring their relationships with foreign countries of concern post-award, for any changes that may impact previous disclosures. SBCs receiving an award under the SBIR/STTR program are required to submit an updated Disclosure Form to report any of the following changes to NIH, CDC, and FDA throughout the duration of the award:
Regular, annual updates are required at the time of all SBIR/STTR annual, interim, and final Research Performance Progress Reports (RPPRs). For changes that occur between RPPR submissions, recipients must request prior approval from NIH for legal actions such as merger, acquisition, and successor-in-interest or any other change in ownership, entity structure, covered individual, or other substantive changes in circumstances no later than 30 days before the proposed change. See NIH Grants Policy Statement 8.1.3 Requests for Prior Approval and NIH Grants Policy Statement 18.5.2.2 Change in Organization Size & Change of Recipient Institution Actions for more details. Disclosure Forms are required for any changes as described above. Recipients are required to upload these updated disclosures using the Additional Materials (AM) tool in eRA Commons.
If the recipient reports a covered foreign relationship that meets any of the risk criteria prohibiting funding described in this NOFO, NIH, CDC, and FDA may deem it necessary to terminate the award for material failure to comply with the federal statutes, regulations, or terms and conditions of the federal award. Refer to NIH GPS Section 8.5.2 Remedies for Noncompliance or Enforcement Actions: Suspension, Termination, and Withholding of Support for more information. Recipients are encouraged to monitor their covered foreign relationships post-award and avoid entering into relationships, both funded and unfunded, that may pose a security risk and jeopardize their ability to retain their award.
Agency Recovery Authority and Repayment of Funds
An SBC will be required to repay all amounts received from NIH, CDC, and FDA under the award if either of the following determinations are made upon assessment of a change to their disclosure:
The repayment requirements and procedures provided in Section 8.5.4 Recovery of Funds of the NIH GPS apply and may also be subject to additional noncompliance and enforcement actions as described in Section 8.5.2 of the GPS. Recipients are required to follow the repayment procedures provided in the Guidance for Repayment of Grant Funds to the NIH.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
eRA Service Desk - Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, and post-submission issues.
Grants.gov Support Center - Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and services (e.g., Workspace, subscriptions).
NIH SEED (Small business Education and Entrepreneurial Development)
Telephone: 301-827- 8595
Email: SEEDinfo@nih.gov
See NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices for ICO-specific contacts.
Examine your eRA Commons account for review assignment and contact information (information appears two weeks after the submission due date).
See NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices for ICO-specific contacts.
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 2 CFR Part 200.
The SBIR Program is mandated by the Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982 (P.L. 97-219), reauthorizing legislation (P.L. 99-443) P.L. 102-564, P.L. 112-81 (SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011), as reauthorized and extended under P.L. 114-328, Section 1834, P.L. 115-232, P.L. 117-183, and P.L. 119-83. The basic design of the NIH SBIR Program is in accordance with the Small Business Administration (SBA) SBIR and STTR Policy Directive.