NOTICE OF FUNDING OPPORTUNITY

BASIC INFORMATION

FEDERAL AGENCY:

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)

FUNDING OPPORTUNITY TITLE:
Secondary Education, Two-Year Postsecondary Education, and Agriculture in the K-12 Classroom Challenge Grants Program
ANNOUNCEMENT TYPE:
Initial Announcement
FUNDING YEAR:

Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 

FUNDING OPPORTUNITY NUMBER:
USDA-NIFA-CSPECA-32938
ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER:
10.226
FUNDING DETAILS (ANTICIPATED):

Available Funding:          $750,000 

Award Range:                 $10,000 - $150,000 

Number of Awards:         8 

LETTER OF INTENT DEADLINE:

A Letter of Intent is not requested for this funding opportunity announcement.

APPLICATION DEADLINE:

5:00 P.M. Eastern Time, 07/27/2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This notice identifies the objectives for the Secondary Education, Two-Year Postsecondary Education, and Agriculture in the K-12 Classroom Challenge Grants (SPECA) Program projects, deadlines, funding information, eligibility criteria for projects and applicants, and application forms and associated instructions. NIFA requests applications for the SPECA program to promote and strengthen food and agricultural science education. The amount available for grants in FY2026 is approximately $750,000.

AGENCY CONTACT:

See Appendix I.

RELATED ANNOUNCEMENTS:

No Related Announcements

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), to the extent permitted by law, will no longer make grants or otherwise fund programs or activities that improperly discriminate on the basis of race or sex, including discrimination in the name of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion policies. Instead, USDA will prioritize merit and efficiency. USDA recognizes programs and initiatives will have the greatest impact when these programs and initiatives put American farmers, ranchers, and foresters first by:

  • solving the most pressing challenges they face;
  • protecting America's food, fuel, and fiber supply to enhance national security;
  • supporting production of healthy and safe food for consumers;
  • expanding and developing domestic markets; 
  • training the next generation of agriculturalists; and
  • fueling innovation to keep American farmers at the forefront of productivity.

The National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) is committed to advancing these principles and encourages applicants to actively engage farmers, ranchers, and foresters when applying for funding opportunities to ensure relevancy and adherence to them. NIFA also encourages agricultural leaders to engage in the peer review panel process to ensure American producers are better served through research, education, and extension activities.

Projects submitted under this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) should align with USDA Secretary's Memorandum 1078-020 Directive on Departmental Research and Development Priorities:

  1. Increasing Profitability of Farmers and Ranchers
  2. Expanding Markets and Creating New Uses of U.S. Agricultural Products
  3. Protecting the Integrity of American Agriculture from Invasive Species
  4. Promoting Soil Health to Regenerate Long-Term Productivity of Land
  5. Improving Human Health through Precision Nutrition and Food Quality
Stakeholder Input:

NIFA seeks comments on all NOFOs and uses comments to help meet the requirements of Section 103(c)(2) of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 (7 U.S.C. 7613(c)(2)). Applicants may submit written comments to Policy@usda.gov.


PART I. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION

A. Legislative Authority

Section 1417(j) of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (NARETPA), as amended (7 U.S.C. 3152(j)), authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to promote and strengthen secondary education and 2-year postsecondary education to help ensure the existence of a qualified workforce to serve the food and agricultural sciences system and promote complementary and synergistic linkages among secondary, 2-year postsecondary, and higher education programs in the food and agricultural sciences to promote excellence in education and encourage more young Americans to pursue and complete a baccalaureate or higher degree in the food and agricultural sciences..

B. Purpose and Priorities

The purpose of the SPECA program is to award grants to:

  1. Enhance curricula in agricultural education;
  2. Increase faculty teaching competencies;
  3. Interest young people in pursuing higher education in order to prepare for scientific and professional careers in the food and agricultural sciences;
  4. Promote the incorporation of agriscience and agribusiness subject matter into other instructional programs, particularly classes in science, business, and consumer education;
  5. Facilitate joint initiatives by the grant recipient with other secondary schools, institutions of higher education that award an associate degree, and institutions of higher education that award a bachelor's degree to maximize the development and use of resources, such as faculty, facilities, and equipment, to improve agriscience and agribusiness education;
  6. Support other initiatives designed to meet local, State, regional, or national needs related to promoting excellence in agriscience and agribusiness education; and
  7. Support current agriculture in the classroom programs for grades K–12.
Priorities:

Project Category. Each project must support academic instruction with a primary focus in at least one of the following three K-14 Grade Levels:

  1. K-8 grade levels: Projects with a specific focus on any of the academic grades, kindergarten through 8.
  2. Secondary School: Projects with a specific focus on any of the academic grades 9 through 12.
  3. Junior or Community College: Projects with a specific focus on associate degree level (2-year postsecondary) activities.

All SPECA proposals submitted will be reviewed using the same evaluation criteria and may receive separate funding considerations based on the project categories described above. Projects with a target audience of baccalaureate, graduate, doctoral students, or professional development of teachers should refer to other Education Grant Programs offered through NIFA that are supportive of such activities.

Educational Need Areas. When preparing a SPECA-funded project, the rationale for choosing a particular Educational Need Area below must be explained in the context of how the project can contribute to the development of a cadre of students who will either pursue higher degrees in the food and agricultural sciences or be prepared to enter the food and agricultural sciences workforce.

Educational Need Areas for the SPECA program are:

  1. Curriculum Development, Instructional Delivery Systems, and Expanding Student Career Opportunities. To promote new and improved curricula and materials to increase the quality of, and continuously renew, the nation's K-14 academic programs in the food and agricultural sciences. Projects should stimulate the development and facilitate the use of exemplary education models and materials that incorporate the most recent advances in subject matter research, research on teaching and learning theory, and instructional technology. Projects must include strategies for the adoption and integration of curricula, materials and other products generated.

Examples of eligible projects in this Need Area may include, but are not limited to, the following strategies: 

           a. The development of innovative course content, including innovative ways to integrate scientific research experiences into K-14 curricula such as STEM labs, school gardens or other activities that provide experiential learning opportunities to students.

           b. The use of new approaches to the study of traditional subjects or the introduction of new subjects in food and agricultural sciences.

           c. Hands-on learning experiences and methods to extend learning beyond the classroom and provide students with opportunities to solve complex problems in the context of real-world situations.

           d. Opportunities for students to complete apprenticeships, internships, career mentoring experiences, or other participatory learning experiences.

           e. Creating career placement or higher education academic counseling activities to encourage graduates to pursue postsecondary food and agricultural sciences degrees.

2. Facilitating Interaction with other Academic Institutions. To promote K-14 focused activities that form linkages between secondary, 2-year postsecondary, and baccalaureate degree-granting institutions to maximize the use of resources supporting outstanding education in the food and agricultural sciences. Activities should focus on ensuring completion of secondary degrees, enrollment into postsecondary programs and/or transfer to a 4-year institution. Partnerships, collaborative arrangements, and shared resources between institutions (including course credit sharing arrangements) are encouraged. Examples of strategies include:

           a. Development and use of articulation agreements, 2+2 or 2+2+2 arrangements (policies and programs designed to foster credit transfer between high schools, community colleges, and four-year institutions), advanced placement credit transfer, or the sharing of faculty and facilities.

           b. A project that focuses on developing and implementing comprehensive, multi-institutional practices proven to recruit and retain K-14 level students with a focus on cultivating those students to pursue a postsecondary food and agricultural sciences degree.

           c. A project that will result in establishing and implementing programs or procedures (articulation agreements, electronic exchange of coursework, etc.) to disseminate curricula, instructional methods, or training practices to faculty across the state or region.

Additional Information

  1. SPECA-funded projects must engage more than a single course or an individual instructor.
  2. Applicants are encouraged to collaborate with an agency or research facility, including a USDA agency, to leverage grant funds and/or contribute towards overall goals and objectives.
  3. If organized by the program, the Project Director (PD) will be required to attend one NIFA SPECA PD meeting during the performance period of the award. Reasonable travel expenses must be included as part of the project budget. While budgets should account for this travel, NIFA may consider virtual or hybrid meetings.

Leadership Skills Development:
The development of leadership skills, knowledge, and qualities are necessary to prepare students for agricultural and related careers in the private sector, government, and academia. Teaching applications must demonstrably incorporate a leadership development component to equip students with technical and leadership abilities upon graduation. Specific activities may include:
1.    Developing practical applications to increase understanding of leadership roles, including critical thinking, problem solving, and communication skills; ethics and professionalism; and working in teams.
2.    Connecting the academic classroom experience with daily leadership roles and organizational activities.
3.    Providing opportunities for mentoring and shadowing; and
4.    Organizing leadership academies, workshops, trainings, etc.
 

C. Program Key Information

The following key program information only pertains to the funding year for FY 2026.

PROGRAM NAME:
Secondary Education, Two-Year Postsecondary Education, and Agriculture in the K-12 Classroom Challenge Grants Program
PROGRAM ACRONYM:

SPECA

PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION CODE (PCC):

CSPECA

PROJECT TYPE:
Education Project
GRANT TYPE:
Standard Grants
AWARD DURATION:

24 - 36 Months

MINIMUM AWARD AMOUNT:
$10,000
MAXIMUM AWARD AMOUNT:
$150,000

PART II. AWARD INFORMATION

A. Available Funding

The amount available for SPECA in FY 2026 is approximately $750,000. USDA is not committed to fund any particular application or to make a specific number of awards.

The Automated Standard Application for Payments, operated by the Department of Treasury, Bureau of Fiscal Service, is the designated payment system for awards resulting from this NOFO.

B. Application Restrictions

NIFA will evaluate applications using the criteria described in Part V of this NOFO. Applications for FY 2026 is limited to the following application types: 

New Application: New applications will be evaluated using the criteria described in Part V of this NOFO and are subject to the due dates herein (see Appendix III for definition).

Resubmitted Application: Resubmitted applications must be submitted as a New proposal. Applicants must include their responses to the previous review panel summary within the Narrative document, even when submitting as New. After submitting a Resubmission, applicants must notify NIFA Program staff by email and provide the following information: 1. Application Title, 2. New grant number, and 3. Previous grant number. NIFA Program staff contact information can be found under the Program Contacts section in Appendix I: Agency Contact. 

C. Project and Grant Types

The following describes the types of applications that are eligible for funding:

  1. Project Types. Applicants within this NOFO must propose Education projects: 
  2. Application must distinguish between a Regular Proposal or a Collaborative Proposal
    1. Regular Proposal
      1. Applicants may request up to $50,000 (total, not per year) for a Regular proposal.
      2. Applicant executes the project without the requirement of sharing grant funds with other project partners. 
    2. Collaborative Proposal
      1. Applicants may request up to $150,000 (total, not per year) for a Collaboration Proposal.
      2. Applicant executes the project with assistance from at least one additional partner. The partners must share grant funds (see explanation of required fund distribution percentage among partners in the definition section of this NOFO).

Documented Impacts of Collaboration Proposals must include, but are not limited to the following:

  1. An assessment of significant progress toward addressing the regional or national challenge of increasing the number of food and agricultural sciences graduates.
  2. Expansion of the number of students who enroll in post-secondary courses in food and agricultural sciences.
  3. Enhanced retention rates of students exposed to project activities.
  4.  Demonstrate the effectiveness of this project to the food and agricultural sciences community through a comprehensive project evaluation, using the indicators and methods defined in this NOFO.

D. Ethical Conduct of Funded Projects

In accordance with sections 2, 3, and 8 of 2 CFR Part 422, institutions that conduct USDA-funded extramural research must foster an atmosphere conducive to research integrity, bear primary responsibility for prevention and detection of research misconduct, and maintain and effectively communicate and train their staff regarding policies and procedures. In the event an application to NIFA results in an award, the Authorized Representative (AR) assures, through acceptance of the award, that the institution will comply with the above requirements. Award recipients must, upon request, make available to NIFA the policies, procedures, and documentation to support the conduct of the training. See Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research for further information.

PART III. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

A. Eligibility Requirements

Applicants must meet all the requirements discussed in this NOFO. Failure to meet the eligibility criteria by the application deadline may result in exclusion from consideration or preclude NIFA from making an award. For those new to Federal financial assistance, NIFA's About Grants provides highly recommended information about grants and other resources to help understand the Federal awards process.

Eligibility Type:

The following entity(ies) may apply to this NOFO: Organizations.

 

Eligibility Requirements

 Applications may only be submitted by: (1) public secondary schools 20 U.S.C. 7801(45), (2) public or private nonprofit junior and community colleges, (3) institutions of higher education (20 U.S.C. 1001), or (4) nonprofit organizations (Attach IRS 501(c)(3) status under R&R 'Other Project Information' Field 12 Other Attachments).   

School boards are not eligible as legal recipients of the award.

USDA will not accept applications for grants and cooperative agreements submitted for dangerous gain-of-function research, as defined in Section 8 of E.O. 14292.

Duplicate or Multiple Submissions:

Submissions of duplicate or predominantly overlapping applications are not allowed. An eligible applicant may submit multiple applications on behalf of multiple institution's project directors whereas they are not essentially duplications of the same project or portions of the same project to multiple programs.

For additional information or clarification please contact the SPECA Program inbox at sm.if.speca@usda.gov . NIFA will disqualify both applications if an applicant submits duplicate or multiple submissions. For those new to Federal financial assistance, NIFA's Grants Overview provides highly recommended information about grants and other resources to help understand the Federal awards process. 

B. Cost Sharing or Matching

Match Required:

This funding opportunity announcement has no matching requirement. NIFA will not factor matching resources into the review process as an evaluation criterion. While not required, cost share is encouraged. 

PART IV. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION

A. Method of Application

Applicants must apply to this NOFO electronically; no other method or response is accepted. The electronic application for this NOFO and additional resources are available on Grants.gov and Grants 101Steps to Obtain Application Materials provides instructions on how to obtain an electronic application. Part III of the NIFA Grants Application Guide contains detailed information regarding the Grants.gov registration process. The NIFA Grants Application Guide is contained in the specific funding opportunity package. When applying for a NIFA award, it is important to reference the version of the guide that is included in the specific funding opportunity application package.

Steps to Obtain Application Materials:

Step One: Register

Applicant Organizations: To be eligible to apply for or receive a federal award, applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations:

  • System for Award Management (SAM):
    • Organizations must have an active SAM registration, which must be renewed annually.
    • Renewal may take as long as the initial registration.
    • Domestic organizations will be assigned a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code if they don't already have one.
  • NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code:
    • Required only for foreign organizations.
    • This code replaces the CAGE code required for SAM registration.
  • Unique Entity Identifier (UEI):
    • Issued during the SAM registration process.
    • The same UEI must be used across all registrations and on the grant application.
  • eRA Commons:
    • After obtaining a UEI, organizations can register with eRA Commons while completing their Grants.gov registration.
    • Registration must be complete before application submission.
    • Organizations must designate at least one Signing Official (SO) and one Project Director (PD) in eRA Commons when submitting an application.
  • Grants.gov:
    • Requires an active SAM registration to complete.
    • Must be finalized before submitting the application.

Important Note: Registration can take six weeks or longer, so begin the process as early as possible. All registrations must be completed before submitting your application

Project Directors (PD(s)): All PD(s) must have an active eRA Commons account.

  • Work with your organization to either:
    • Create a new account, or
    • Affiliate an existing account with the applicant organization.
  • If a PD also serves as the Signing Official, they must have two separate eRA Commons accounts, one for each role.

Important Note: Creating an eRA Commons account can take up to two weeks.

Step Two: Download Adobe

Download and Install Adobe Reader (see Adobe Software Compatibility for basic system requirements).

Step Three: Find Application

Using this funding opportunity number USDA-NIFA-CSPECA-32938, search for application here.

Step Four: Assess Readiness

Contact an Authorized Representative (AR) prior to starting an application to assess the organization's readiness to submit an electronic application.

Help and Resources:

NIFA Support

Email: grantapplicationquestions@usda.gov 

Business hours: Monday thru Friday, 7 A.M. – 5 P.M. ET, except Federal holidays.

Grants.gov Support

Grants.gov Online Support 
Telephone support: 800-518-4726
Toll-Free or 606-545-5035

Email support: support@grants.gov
Self-service customer-based support: Grants.gov iPortal

Customer service business Hours 24/7, except Federal holidays.

eRA Service Desk

Questions regarding eRA Commons and post-submission questions and inquiries

Finding help online and submitting web tickets: https://www.era.nih.gov/need-help  (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)

Business Hours: Monday - Friday, 7 A.M. - 8 P.M. ET except Federal holidays

B. Content and Form of Application

The NIFA Grants Application Guide is part of the corresponding application package for this NOFO. The NOFO overrides the NIFA Grants Application Guide if there is a discrepancy between the two documents. Applicants that do not meet the application requirements, to include partial applications, risk being excluded from NIFA's review. NIFA will assign a proposal number to all applications that meet the requirements of this NOFO. Applicants must refer to the proposal number when corresponding with NIFA. Key Application Instructions outlines key instructions for applicants.  

Key Application Instructions:

Portable Document Format (PDF):

Attachments must be in Portable Document Format (PDF). Refer to Part IV of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for additional information.

Attachments:

Check the manifest of submitted files to verify that attachments are in the correct format. Refer to Part IV of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for additional information.

Administrative Review:

Conduct an administrative review of the application before submission. Refer to Part IV of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for additional information.

Submission Instructions:

Follow the submission instructions. Refer to Part IV of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for additional information.

Email Address:

Provide an accurate email address, where designated, on the SF-424 R&R. Refer to Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for additional information.

SF 424 R&R Cover Sheet:

See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for the required certifications and assurances. 

Grants.gov Support Center:

Contact the Grants.gov Support Center for technical support and keep a record of the correspondence.

eRA Service Desk:

Contact the eRA Service Desk for questions related to eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, and post-submission inquiries.

Correspondence:

Contact NIFA if applicant does not receive correspondence from NIFA regarding an application within 30 days of the application deadline.

SF 424 R&R Project/Performance Site Location(s):

See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide.

R&R Other Project Information Form:

SF 424 R&R Cover Sheet. See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for the required certifications and assurances.

R&R Other Project Information Form. See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide.

  1. Project Summary (PS)/Abstract. The PS must show how the project goals align with the project goals of the SPECA. Application will not be accepted for review if the project summary/abstract is not included, missing information, or not in PDF format. See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for instructions and suggested template.
    Include the following information:
    1. Project Title
    2. Project Director (and any) Co-Project Director(s) (include institutional affiliation for each)
    3. Project Category: (see Part I)
    4. Educational Need Area: (Part I)
    5. Projected number of students or faculty to be served by the project during the project period (i.e., using a new curriculum, instructional delivery system, student career opportunity; benefiting from a partnership between institutions; etc.).
    6. Primary Discipline Code/Academic Discipline (see Table 6 below)
  2. Application Type: Regular or Collaborative Proposal
  3. Total Funds Requested: List total Federal funds requested for this application. (If this is a collaborative proposal, also list each partner's total funds requested next to the institution/organization's name)
  4. Partners: For a collaborative proposal, list all partner institutions/organizations that will share grant funding. (Note: Each partner so identified needs to have their budget information submitted on a separate subaward budget attachment)
  5. Summary Text: Provide a very concise (max. 250 word) summary of your project. 
    Application will be excluded from review if the summary text exceeds 250 words.
    Summary text should include the following:
    1. Purpose: What is the major problem your project will address?
    2. Audience: Who are the intended beneficiaries? Who will be impacted?
    3. Products: What will be produced?
    4. Outcome/Impact: What is the intended result (consequence) of your project?
  6. Project Narrative (PN). The PN must not exceed 10 single-spaced pages (up to 46 lines of text per page) including all figures and tables. The font size should be no smaller than 12 points, Times New Roman. The page limits outlined here ensure fair competition.  Applications will not be accepted for review if the project narrative is not included, exceeds 10 single-spaced pages, or is not in PDF format. The PN must include all the following: 
    1. Potential for Advancing the Quality of Education; Significance of the Problem
      1. Identification of Educational Problem and Project Impact: Briefly state: (1) the specific instructional problem/challenge (or opportunity) to be addressed; (2) the anticipated project audience; and (3) the project's target objectives (what change in education is proposed?) and its anticipated, overall impact on improving the quality of food and agricultural sciences education. (The impact must be a measurable change at the project's conclusion.) Clearly identify and explain how the proposed project will address your Educational Need Area described in Part I.
      2. Project Justification: Summarize the body of knowledge justifying the need for the proposed project. Describe any ongoing or recently completed, significant activities related to the proposed project for which funding was received under a previous SPECA award.
      3. Institutional Goals: Demonstrate how the institution/organization attributes a high priority to the project; discuss how the project will: (1) contribute to the achievement of the institution/organization's long-term (five- to ten-year) goals; (2) help satisfy the institution's high-priority objectives; and (3) be linked to/supported by the institution's strategic plan.
      4. Innovation: Describe the proposal's creative approach to improving the quality of food and agricultural sciences education, or solving an education problem. Using either actual experiences or literature background information, show why you selected this approach.
    2. Proposed Approach and Cooperative Linkages:
      1. Plan of Operation and Methodology: Describe procedures for accomplishing the objectives of the project. Describe plans for management of the project to ensure its proper and efficient administration. Describe the way in which resources and personnel will be used to conduct the project.
      2. Timetable: Identify all important project milestones (performance targets that indicate when project goals will be met) and dates as they relate to project start-up, execution, evaluation, dissemination, and closeout.
      3. Products, Results, and Measurable Outcomes: Outline the expected products/results and their outcome and impact on strengthening food and agricultural sciences education in the United States. Make sure to differentiate among the three terms:
        1. "Products" may be actual items or services acquired with funds, e.g., "...developed three new Web-based courses".
        2. "Results" are accomplishments related to the products, e.g., "...additional course materials are now available online to reinforce student learning during non-classroom hours".
        3. "Impacts" are the benefits to your audience. Impacts are the consequences of your project and the most critical elements in your Evaluation Plan. They are a measure of the results by comparison to what might have happened in the absence of the funded project, e.g., "...an observed, overall increase in student learning based upon 8% higher average test scores of those students who both attended class and used the supplemental, Web-based course materials". 
      4. Evaluation Plans: State the methodologies to be used in assessing the accomplishment of stated products, results, and measurable impacts from the project. Discuss the strategies and metrics for evaluating progress toward meeting the two SPECA program goals from Part I. Describe any data to be collected and analyzed. Demonstrate how the project will improve education. This section shall clearly indicate how you plan to measure impacts.
      5. Dissemination Plans: The application must document how project accomplishments (products, results, and impacts...etc.) will be published or otherwise disseminated to the broadest extent throughout the community. Discuss the institution/organization's commitment to disseminate project results and products and the potential for institutionalization. Identify target audiences and explain methods of communication. 
      6. Partnerships and Collaborative Efforts: Explain how the project will maximize partnership and collaborative efforts to strengthen food and agricultural sciences education. Provide evidence, via letters from the parties involved in the partnership or collaborative arrangement. 
    3. Institutional Capability and Capacity Building:
      1. Institutional/Organizational Commitment and Capability: Demonstrate that the program administration is committed to this project and has the capability to ensure its completion.
      2. Institutional/Organizational Resources: Document that necessary institutional/ organizational resources (administrative, facilities, equipment, and/or materials), and other appropriate resources, will be made available to the project. Demonstrate how the institutional/organizational resources to be made available to the project, when combined with the support requested from USDA, will be adequate to carry out the activities of the project.
      3. Continuation Plans: Discuss the likelihood of, or specific plans for, continuation or expansion of the project beyond the period of USDA support. For example, does the institution's/organization's long-range budget or academic plan provide for the realistic continuation or expansion of the initiative undertaken by this project after the grant period ends, are plans for eventual self-support built into the project, are plans being made to institutionalize the program if it meets with success, and are there indications of other continuing non-Federal support? 
      4. Key Personnel: Discuss the adequacy and specific attributes and project responsibilities of each key person associated with the project. Also, include the background and qualifications of those personnel who will be responsible for assessing project results and administering the project evaluation and reporting process.
    4. Budget and Cost-Effectiveness;
      1. Budget: In addition to the separate, required budget forms and budget justification, discuss how the budget specifically supports the proposed project activities. Explain how such budget items as professional or technical staff time and salary, travel, equipment, etc., are necessary and reasonable to achieve project objectives. If applicable, justify that the total budget is allocated adequately between the applicant and any collaborating institution/organization(s) and will be appropriate to carry out the activities of the project. 
      2. Cost-effectiveness: Justify the project's cost-effectiveness. Show how the project maximizes the use of limited resources, optimizes educational value for the dollar, achieves economies of scale, or leverages additional funds.
  7. Field 12, Add Other Attachments. See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide.
    1. Response to Previous Review – PDF Attachment. 1 Page Limit. Title the attachment as 'Response to Previous Review' in the document header and save file as 'Response to Previous Review'. This requirement only applies to "Resubmitted Applications" as described under Part II, B, "Types of Applications". PDs must respond to the previous review panel summary on no more than one page. If desired, additional comments may be included in the text of the Project Narrative, subject to the page limitations of that section.
    2. Appendices to Project Narrative – PDF Attachment. Title the attachment as 'Appendices' in the document header and save file as 'Appendices'. Appendices to the Project Narrative are allowed if they are directly germane to the proposed project. The addition of appendices should not be used to circumvent the text and/or figures and tables page limitations.
    3. Collaborative Arrangements – PDF Attachment. Title the attachment as 'Collaborative Arrangements' in the document header and save file as 'Collaborative Arrangement'. If it is necessary to enter into formal consulting or collaborative arrangements with others, such arrangements should be fully explained and justified. If the consultant(s) or collaborator(s) are known at the time of the application, a vitae or resume should be provided. In addition, evidence (e.g., letter of support signed by the AR of the consultant/collaborating organization) should be provided that the collaborators involved have agreed to render these services. The applicant also will be required to provide additional information on consultants and collaborators in the budget portion of the application.
    4. Mentoring Plan (MP) – PDF Attachment, 2 Page Limit for each educational level. An MP is strongly recommended if the proposal requests funding for student support, including scholarships or fellowships. If various tiers of students or scholars are represented in the proposal. Please provide separate MP for each educational or professional level targeted (e.g., K-8 students, high school students, community college students). The MP should incorporate the following as appropriate: a.) the roles and responsibilities of the Project Director and Co-Project Directors in managing the mentoring process; b.) training for and/or credentials of individuals who will serve as mentors (i.e., mentor training). Mentors may be experienced mentors from academia, industry, or government, or student peers at various levels who are expected to provide guidance with the activities and facilitate the amplification of program-specific perspectives and accomplishments of the mentees; c.) a description of mentoring activities that may include, but are not limited to, peer mentoring or layered mentoring, whereby a set of mentees are progressively mentored by others at a higher level in their careers; d.) a description of processes to ensure reasonable accommodations for program participants with disabilities or challenges with accessing program activities. Please incorporate mentoring activities into the overall project timeline. Scholarship programs should also include plans to accommodate scholarship recipients who find it necessary to interrupt their program of study because of health, personal, or other reasonable non-academic and non-disciplinary cause(s).
    5. IRS 501(c)(3) Status – PDF Attachment. Title the attachment as 'IRS 501 (c)(3) Status' in the document header and save file as 'IRS501(c)(3) Status'. Applications from nonprofit organizations must provide proof that the IRS recognizes the organization as a tax-exempt entity under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
    6. Expected Outcomes – PDF Attachment. 1 page Limit. Title the attachment "Expected Outcomes" in the document header and name the file to be saved as "Expected Outcomes". Please use a format, similar to what is provided below, to submit expected impacts and attach it as the last page of the application.

       
Table 6. Academic Codes and Disciplines
A Animal Sciences
B Related Biological Sciences (includes General/Basic Biotechnology, Biochemistry and Microbiology
C Natural Resources (includes Forestry)
E Agriscience (includes Agricultural/Biological Engineering)
F Food Science/Technology and Manufacturing
G General Food, Agriculture and Human Sciences (includes multidisciplinary problems)
H Human Sciences/ Family and Consumer Sciences
J Entomology - Animal
M Agribusiness (includes Management, Marketing, and Agricultural Economics)
N Human Nutrition
P Plant Sciences and Horticulture
Q Aquaculture
S Agricultural Social Sciences (includes Agricultural Education, Agricultural Communications and Rural Sociology)
T Entomology - Plant
W Water Science
O Other (Please include the discipline supported)
R&R Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded):

See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for profile requirements, details about the biographical sketch, and suggested support templates.

All Senior/Key Persons need an eRA Commons account. 

R&R Personal Data:

This information is voluntary and is not a precondition of award (see Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide).

R&R Budget - Match:

This funding opportunity announcement does not have matching requirement.

R&R Budget - IDC:

See Part IV, C of this NOFO for funding restrictions regarding IDC, and Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for additional information.

C. Funding Restrictions

Indirect Cost (IDC) is not to exceed 30 percent of the recipient's Total Federal Funds Awarded (TFFA)

7 U.S.C. 3310 limits the recovery of IDC for the overall award to 30 percent of the TFFA under a research, education, or extension grant. The maximum allowable IDC amount recoverable under the award, including the IDC charged by the subawardee(s), if any, is the lesser of the following and is determined by calculating the amount of IDC using:

  1. the sum of an institution’s negotiated indirect cost rate and the indirect cost rate charged by subawardees, if any; or
  2. 30 percent of TFFA.

If the result of number one is the lesser of the two amounts, the grant recipient is allowed to charge the negotiated IDC rate on the prime award and the subaward(s), if any. Any subawards would be subject to the subawardee’s negotiated IDC rate. The subawardee may charge its negotiated IDC rate on its portion of the award, provided the sum of the IDC amount charged under the award by the prime awardee and the subawardee(s) does not exceed 30 percent of the TFFA.

If the result of number two is the lesser of the two amounts, then the maximum IDC allowed for the overall award, including any subaward(s), is limited to 30 percent of the TFFA. That is, the IDC of the prime awardee plus the sum of the IDC charged by the subawardee(s), if any, may not exceed 30 percent of the TFFA.

In the event of an award, the prime awardee is responsible for ensuring the maximum indirect cost allowed for the award is not exceeded when combining IDC for the Federal portion (i.e., prime and subawardee(s)) and any applicable cost-sharing. Amounts exceeding the maximum allowable IDC are considered unallowable. See sections 408 and 410 of 2 CFR 200.

If the applicant does not have a negotiated rate and NIFA is the cognizant agency, the applicant may request an IDC rate. Applicants are not required to complete the IDC package during the application process and need only to calculate a rate to serve as a basis for requesting IDC. If awarded, the applicant will be required to submit a complete IDC proposal package to obtain a negotiated rate.

Organizations that do not have a current negotiated (including provisional) rate may elect the de minimis rate (2 CFR 200.414(f)). The Uniform Guidance offers the option of electing to charge a de minimis rate of 15 percent of modified total direct costs (MTDC), which may be used indefinitely. As described above and in 2 CFR 200.403, costs must be charged consistently as either indirect or direct costs but may not be double-charged or inconsistently charged as both. If elected, this methodology must be used consistently for all Federal awards until such time as a non-Federal entity chooses to negotiate for a rate, which it may do at any time.

See NIFA Indirect Costs for information including additional resources and NIFA Indirect Cost Guidance Chart.

Authorizing Legislation:

Successful applicants must not use grant funds awarded under the authority of this NOFO to renovate or refurbish research, education, or extension space; purchase or install fixed equipment in such space; or to plan, repair, rehabilitate, acquire, or construct buildings or facilities.

PART V. APPLICATION REVIEW REQUIREMENTS

A. NIFA's Evaluation Process

NIFA evaluates each application in a two-part process. First, we screen each application to ensure that it meets the administrative requirements set forth in this NOFO. All administrative requirements must be met in order for the application to proceed to the next level of review. Second, a scientific peer-review process will be used to technically evaluate applications that have met the administrative requirements using a review panel (see NIFA Peer Review Process).

Scientific Peer Review Process:

NIFA selects reviewers for the review panel based upon their training and experience in relevant scientific, extension, or education fields, taking into account the following factors:

  1. The level of relevant formal scientific, technical education, or extension experience of the individual, as well as the extent to which an individual is engaged in relevant research, education, or extension activities.
  2. The need to include experts from various areas of specialization within relevant scientific, education, or extension fields.
  3. The need to include other experts (e.g., agricultural producers, range or forest managers/operators, researchers, educators, evaluators, and consumers) who can assess relevance of the applications to targeted audiences and to program needs.
  4. The need to include experts from a variety of organizational types (e.g., colleges, universities, industry, state and Federal agencies, and private profit and non-profit organizations) and geographic locations.
  5. The need to maintain a balanced composition with regard to the reviewer's area of expertise, geographic area, and entity type, as appropriate.
  6. The need to include reviewers who can judge the effective usefulness of each application to producers and the general public.

After each peer review panel has completed its deliberations, the responsible program staff of NIFA will recommend that your project is either approved for support from currently available funds or declined due to insufficient funds or unfavorable review.

NIFA reserves the right to negotiate with the PD/PI and/or the submitting organization or institution regarding project revisions (e.g., reductions in the scope of work, funding level, period, or method of support) prior to recommending any project for funding.

After the review process has been completed, NIFA sends copies of reviews, not including the identity of reviewers, and a summary (if applicable) of the review panel comments to the PD.
 

Conflicts of Interest:

NIFA takes extreme care to prevent any actual or perceived conflicts of interest that may influence the review or evaluation (see NIFA Peer Review Process for Competitive Grant Applications).

B. Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation Criteria:

NIFA will use the following criteria to evaluate and score applications to this funding opportunity.

 
Maximum Points: 25

Potential for Advancing Quality of Education/Significance of the Problem. This criterion is used to assess the  extent to which the project will have an impact upon and advance the quality of food and agricultural sciences by strengthening institutional capacities to meet clearly delineated needs. Elements considered include institutional long-range goals, identification of a problem or opportunity to be addressed, justification for the project, innovation, multidisciplinary and/or problem-based focus, and potential for adoption by other institutions/organizations. The proposed project must also show its relevance to the goals of the SPECA Program of increasing the skills and availability of individuals entering the food and agricultural sciences workforce. Potential project impacts must be stated clearly.


 
Maximum Points: 25

Proposed Approach and Cooperative Linkages. This criterion relates to the soundness of the proposed approach including objectives, methodology, plan of operation, timetable, expected products and results, evaluation, and dissemination plans. The project evaluation plan must state the methodologies to be used in assessing the accomplishment of stated products, results, and measurable impacts from the project. The approach must be based on sound research concepts and educational principles and may be documented through background literature or actual institutional data. Emphasis is placed on the quality of educational or research support provided to the applicant institution/organization through its partnerships and collaborative initiatives, and on the potential cooperative linkages likely to evolve as a result of this project. Any perceived pitfalls and alternative strategies or approaches are addressed.


 
Maximum Points: 15

Institutional Capability and Capacity Building. This criterion relates to the institution's capability to perform the project and the degree to which the project will strengthen its teaching or research capacity. Elements include the institution's commitment to the project, the adequacy of institutional resources (administrative, facilities, management of generated data, equipment, and/or materials) available to carry out the project, potential for academic or research enhancement, and plans for project continuation or expansion beyond the period of USDA support. Include institutional data (i.e., financial, personnel and physical resources available to support the project could all be potential data provided by the applicant, depending upon the particular Need Area) to show the institution's ability to support the proposed project.


 
Maximum Points: 15

Key Personnel. This criterion relates to the adequacy of the number, qualifications and expertise of key persons who will develop and carry out the project, and the qualifications of project personnel who will provide for the assessment of project results and impacts and the dissemination of these findings. Specific roles for each key personnel must be defined to ensure appropriate project leadership and to avoid any duplication of effort.


 
Maximum Points: 20

Budget and Cost-Effectiveness. This criterion relates to the extent to which the total budget adequately supports the project and is cost-effective. Elements considered include the necessity and reasonableness of costs to carry out project activities and achieve project objectives; the appropriateness of budget allocations between the applicant and any collaborating institution(s); the adequacy of time committed to the project by key project personnel; and the degree to which the project maximizes the use of limited resources, optimizes educational value for the dollar, achieves economies of scale, leverages additional funds, and focuses expertise and activity on high-priority educational or research need areas.


C. Organizational Management Information

Applicants must submit specific management information prior to an award and update the information as needed. Applicants may only need to provide an update if there was a change in previously provided information under this or another NIFA program. NIFA provides the requisite forms during the pre-award process. Although an applicant may be eligible for award under this program, there are factors that may exclude an applicant from receiving Federal financial and nonfinancial assistance and benefits under this program (e.g., debarment or suspension of an individual, or a determination that an applicant is not responsible).

D. Application Disposition

Applicants may withdraw at any time before NIFA makes a final funding decision. NIFA will retain all applications, including withdrawn applications and unfunded applications.

PART VI. AWARD ADMINISTRATION

A. General

Within the limit of funds authorized, the NIFA awarding official will make grants to responsible and eligible applicants whose applications are judged most meritorious under the procedures set forth in this NOFO. The date specified by the NIFA awarding official as the effective date of the grant must be no later than September 30 of the federal fiscal year in which the project is approved for support and funds are appropriated for such purpose, unless otherwise permitted by law. The project need not be initiated on the grant effective date, but as soon thereafter as practical so that project goals may be attained within the funded project period. All funds granted by NIFA under this NOFO may be used only for the purpose for which they are granted in accordance with the approved application and budget, regulations, terms and conditions of the award, applicable federal cost principles, USDA assistance regulations, and NIFA General Awards Administration Provisions, 7 CFR Part 3430, subparts A through E.

Award Notice:

The award document will provide pertinent instructions and information as described in 2 CFR 200.211 (see NIFA's Terms and Conditions).

B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements 

Several federal statutes and regulations apply to grant applications and the projects outlined in this NOFO (some are listed here: Federal Regulations). Unless specifically noted by statute or award-specific requirements, NIFA Federal Assistance Policy Guide applies to all NIFA awards.

C. Expected Program Outputs and Reporting Requirements

Output and reporting requirements are included in the award terms and conditions. If there are any program or award-specific award terms, they will be identified in the Award Notice.

PART VII. OTHER INFORMATION

A. Use of Funds and Changes in Budget

Delegation of fiscal responsibility:

Unless the terms and conditions of the award state otherwise, awardees may not in whole or in part delegate or transfer to another person, institution, or organization the responsibility for use or expenditure of award funds.

Changes in Budget or Project Plans:

In accordance with 2 CFR 200.308, awardees must request prior approval from NIFA for the following program or budget-related reasons (the awardee is subject to the terms and conditions identified in the award):

  1. Change in the scope or the objective of the project or program without prior written approval (even if there is no associated budget revision required);
  2. Change in a key person specified in the application or the federal award;
  3. Disengagement from the project for more than three months, or a 25 percent reduction in time devoted to the project;
  4. Inclusion of costs that require prior approval in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E (Cost Principles), or 2 CFR Part 300 Appendix IX, or 48 CFR, unless waived by the Federal awarding agency, 48 CFR Part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures;
  5. Transfer of funds budgeted for participant support costs to other categories of expense (2 CFR 200.456 Participant support costs);
  6. Subawarding, transferring or contracting out of any work under a federal award, including fixed amount subawards (see 2 CFR 200.333, Fixed Amount Subawards), unless described in the application and funded in the approved federal awards. This provision does not apply to the acquisition of supplies, material, equipment, or general support services;
  7. Changes in the approved cost-sharing or matching provided by the non-federal entity;
  8. The need for additional federal funds to complete the project;
  9. Salary rates of pay exceeding an Executive Level IV salary range (see "Rates of Pay for the Executive Schedule" under the "Executive & Senior Level Employee Pay Tables" header at https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/) require prior NIFA approval. This rate does not include any fringe benefits, general and administrative (G&A), overhead, or other expenses. Requests for approval must include the salary rate of pay and a justification for the rate and be sent to the Authorized Departmental Officer (ADO) to awards@usda.gov;
  10. No more than 50 percent of the total dollars of this award may be subcontracted to another party(ies) without prior written approval of the ADO, except subcontracts to Federal agencies.
  11. Transferring funds between the construction and non-construction work under a Federal award; and
  12. A no-cost extension (meaning, an extension of time that does not require the obligation of additional Federal funds) of the period of performance, other than any one-time extension authorized by the Federal agency in accordance with paragraph 2 CFR 200.308(g)(2). All requests for no-cost extensions should be submitted at least 10 calendar days before the conclusion of the period of performance. The Federal agency may approve multiple no-cost extensions under a Federal award if not prohibited by Federal statute or regulation.

B. Confidential Aspects of Applications and Awards

When an application results in an award, it becomes a part of NIFA transaction records, which are available to the public. Information that the Secretary of Agriculture determines to be confidential, privileged, or proprietary in nature will be held in confidence to the extent permitted by law. Therefore, applicants should clearly mark any information within the application they wish to have considered as confidential, privileged, or proprietary. NIFA will retain a copy of an application that does not result in an award for three years. Such an application will be released only with the consent of the applicant or to the extent required by law. An applicant may withdraw at any time prior to the final action thereon.

C. Regulatory Information

This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with state and local officials. Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the collection of information requirements contained in this notice have been approved under OMB Document No. 0524- 0039.

D. Language Access Services

NIFA offers language access services, such as interpretation and translation of vital information, free of charge. If you need interpretation or translation services, please visit NIFA Language Access Services.

APPENDIX I: AGENCY CONTACT

Program Contacts:

For inquiries related to this NOFO, please send your questions to the following email: sm.if.speca@usda.gov 

Administrative Contact:

For administrative questions related to:

  1. Grants.gov, see Part IV of this NOFO.
  2. Other NOFO or application questions, please email grantapplicationquestions@usda.gov.
  3. Awards under this NOFO, please email awards@usda.gov
U.S. Postal Mailing Address:

National Institute of Food and Agriculture
U.S. Department of Agriculture
P.O. Box 419205, MS 10000 
Kansas City, MO 64141-6205

Courier/Package Delivery Address:

National Institute of Food and Agriculture
U.S. Department of Agriculture
2312 East Bannister Road, MS 10000
Kansas City, MO 64141-3061

APPENDIX II: GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Glossary of Terms:
  • Agriculture and Food Research Initiative – AFRI
  • Assistance Listing Number – ALN
  • Authorized Departmental Officer – ADO
  • Authorized Representative – AR
  • Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 – AREERA
  • Coordinated Agricultural Project – CAP
  • Centers of Excellence – COE
  • Data Management Plan – DMP
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture – NIFA
  • Notice of Funding Opportunity - NOFO
  • Research, Education, and Economics – REE
  • Secondary, Two-Year Postsecondary, and Agriculture in the K-12 Classroom Challenge Grants Program - SPECA
  • United States Department of Agriculture – USDA

APPENDIX III: DEFINITIONS

(Refer to 7 CFR 3430 Competitive and Noncompetitive Non-formula Federal Assistance Programs – General Award Administrative Provisions for additional definitions) 

Definitions:
  • New Application: An application not previously submitted to a program.
  • Resubmitted Application: A project application that was previously submitted to a program, but the application was not funded.