NOTICE OF FUNDING OPPORTUNITY

BASIC INFORMATION

FEDERAL AGENCY:

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)

FUNDING OPPORTUNITY TITLE:
Farm Business Management and Benchmarking Competitive Grants Program (FBMB)
ANNOUNCEMENT TYPE:
Initial Announcement
FUNDING YEAR:

Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 

FUNDING OPPORTUNITY NUMBER:
USDA-NIFA-KFBMB-32830
ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER:
10.319
FUNDING DETAILS (ANTICIPATED):

Available Funding:          $2,000,000 

Award Range:                 $200,000 - $450,000 

Number of Awards:         6 

LETTER OF INTENT DEADLINE:

A Letter of Intent is not requested for this funding opportunity announcement.

APPLICATION DEADLINE:

5:00 P.M. Eastern Time, 07/20/2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

NIFA requests applications for the Farm Business Management and Benchmarking Competitive Grants Program (FBMB) for FY 2026 to improve the farm management knowledge and skills of agricultural producers and maintain the national, publicly available farm financial management database to support improved farm management. The anticipated amount available for grants in FY 2026 is approximately $2,000,000.

This notice identifies the objectives for FBMB projects, deadlines, funding information, eligibility criteria for projects and applicants, and application forms and associated instructions.

AGENCY CONTACT:

See Appendix I.

RELATED ANNOUNCEMENTS:

No Related Announcements

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), to the extent permitted by law, will no longer make grants or otherwise fund programs or activities that improperly discriminate on the basis of race or sex, including discrimination in the name of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion policies. Instead, USDA will prioritize merit and efficiency. USDA recognizes programs and initiatives will have the greatest impact when these programs and initiatives put American farmers, ranchers, and foresters first by:

  • solving the most pressing challenges they face;
  • protecting America's food, fuel, and fiber supply to enhance national security;
  • supporting production of healthy and safe food for consumers;
  • expanding and developing domestic markets; 
  • training the next generation of agriculturalists; and
  • fueling innovation to keep American farmers at the forefront of productivity.

The National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) is committed to advancing these principles and encourages applicants to actively engage farmers, ranchers, and foresters when applying for funding opportunities to ensure relevancy and adherence to them. NIFA also encourages agricultural leaders to engage in the peer review panel process to ensure American producers are better served through research, education, and extension activities.

Projects submitted under this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) should align with USDA Secretary's Memorandum 1078-020 Directive on Departmental Research and Development Priorities:

  1. Increasing Profitability of Farmers and Ranchers
  2. Expanding Markets and Creating New Uses of U.S. Agricultural Products
  3. Protecting the Integrity of American Agriculture from Invasive Species
  4. Promoting Soil Health to Regenerate Long-Term Productivity of Land
  5. Improving Human Health through Precision Nutrition and Food Quality
Stakeholder Input:

NIFA seeks comments on all NOFOs and uses comments to help meet the requirements of Section 103(c)(2) of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 (7 U.S.C. 7613(c)(2)). Applicants may submit written comments to Policy@usda.gov.


PART I. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION

A. Legislative Authority

The program is authorized under Section 1672D of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, 7 U.S.C. 5925f, as amended, which authorizes the Secretary, acting through the NIFA, to make competitive research and extension grants.

B. Purpose and Priorities

NIFA is soliciting applications for the FBMB program to improve the farm management knowledge and skills of agricultural producers by maintaining and expanding a national, publicly available farm financial management database to support improved farm management.

The FBMB program aims to strongly support innovative extension approaches and collaborative efforts to maintain and expand the publicly available national farm financial management database (FINBIN). Such efforts are needed to meet the challenges facing the Nation's agriculture and food systems. Farmers, farm managers, and individuals involved in production agriculture must be educated and prepared to work effectively across disciplines to solve agricultural and educational challenges. Meeting these challenges will require projects that are timely, strategic, creative, and multidisciplinary. The FBMB program supports all farmers, ranchers, and producers to develop farm management knowledge and skills that are consistent with the agriculture and food systems priorities of the USDA.

Extension projects supported by the FBMB program, to the extent possible, shall be coordinated and delivered in cooperation with similar services or assistance by other Federal agencies or programs supporting improved farm management.

Priority may be given to grants that demonstrate an ability to work directly with agricultural producers, collaborate with farm management associations and financial management education programs, address the farm management needs of a variety of crops and regions of the United States, and contribute data to support FINBIN.

The FBMB program supports novel projects that encompass the management of money at the personal, firm, and public levels to support livelihoods and quality of life for agricultural producers and farm communities. The FBMB program also supports projects that incorporate leadership skills development, and decision-making, which are important elements to address the many challenges facing agriculture and farm communities. 

For a program informational webinar please visit the NIFA calendar for dates, event registration, and link. If you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in any of the informational webinars listed, please contact the event host listed no later than 10 days prior to the event.

Priorities:

FBMB projects improve the farm management knowledge and skills of individuals directly involved in production agriculture by addressing at least one of the objectives listed below and using at least one of the strategies listed below.

Objectives: Objectives provide clarity on what the project will achieve. FBMB projects must address at least one of these objectives:

  1. Maintain and expand FINBIN to support improved farm management knowledge and skills for producers of a variety of crops and livestock throughout multiple regions of the United States.
  2. Establish or expand outreach-based, collaborative farm management educational programs with farm organizations or associations that will contribute data to FINBIN to improve the farm management knowledge and skills of all agricultural producers.

Strategies: Strategies represent the plans of action and implementation methods used to reach and engage target audiences and stakeholders or to conduct applied research activities. FBMB projects must address at least one of these strategies:

  1. Advance data collection and research on financial ratios related to farm production cost, farm profitability management effectiveness, and the effects of farm policy.
  2. Develop and/or expand cooperation and data sharing among existing farm management associations and business management education programs across the Nation to structure farm financial analyses into a uniform information system.
  3. Provide training, technical assistance, and software to States with farm management associations to facilitate uniform financial procedures and software.
  4. Improve the profitability and competitiveness of small and medium-sized farms and ranches by providing access to high quality, uniform farm business management benchmarking information.
  5. Improve producers' abilities to successfully manage their agricultural operations through periods of high degrees of uncertainty including supply and demand risk, price volatility, and financial stress.

Applicants are encouraged to approach objectives and strategies in their projects by providing evidence of the following elements:

  1. Expand or establish a farm management program that works directly with agricultural producers to contribute data to the national farm management and benchmarking database.
  2. Address the farm management needs of a variety of crops and regions of the United States.
  3. Establish and collaborate with at least five farm management education programs or associations that are representative of agricultural commodities in multiple regions of the United States.
  4. Maintain farm financial analysis software applicable to the production and management of a wide range of crop and livestock agricultural commodities, including organic and specialty crop commodities.
  5. Establish procedures that enable producers to (i) benchmark their farms against peer groups; and (ii) query the benchmarking database by location, farm type, farm size, and commodity at all overall business and individual enterprise levels.
  6. Increase the number of producers whose benchmarking activities identified an improvement in financial performance.
  7. Contribute data to the national farm financial management database.
  8. Provide public online access to farm and ranch financial benchmarking databases.

FBMB supports extension projects which conduct programs and activities that deliver science-based knowledge and informal education programs to people, enabling them to make practical decisions. Examples of extension activities include, but are not limited to, outreach programs that support agricultural literacy, adoption of new practices, and informed decision-making; creation and/or enhancement of resource materials like fact sheets, circulars, and guides; new applications of instructional tools and curricula; train-the-trainer or certification programs, and other capacity-building efforts; and application of innovative instructional methodologies. Program delivery may range from community-based to national audiences and use communication methods from face-to-face to electronic or hybrid approaches. FBMB projects must be able to lead to measurable, documented changes in learning, actions, or conditions in an identified audience or stakeholder group, and projects should synthesize and incorporate a wide range of the latest relevant research results.  

Related Announcements:

C. Program Key Information

The following key program information only pertains to the funding year for FY 2026.

PROGRAM NAME:
Farm Business Management and Benchmarking Competitive Grants Program
PROGRAM ACRONYM:
FBMB
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION CODE (PCC):
KFBMB
PROJECT TYPE:
Extension Project
GRANT TYPE:
Standard Grants
AWARD DURATION:

12-36 Months

MINIMUM AWARD AMOUNT:
$200,000
MAXIMUM AWARD AMOUNT:
$450,000

PART II. AWARD INFORMATION

A. Available Funding

The amount available for FBMB in FY 2026 is approximately $2,000,000. USDA is not committed to fund any particular application or to make a specific number of awards.

The Automated Standard Application for Payments, operated by the Department of Treasury, Bureau of Fiscal Service, is the designated payment system for awards resulting from this NOFO.

B. Application Restrictions

NIFA will evaluate applications using the criteria described in Part V of this NOFO. Applications for FY 2026 is limited to the following application types: 

New Application: New applications will be evaluated using the criteria described in Part V of this NOFO and are subject to the due dates herein (see Appendix III for definition).

Resubmitted Application: Resubmitted applications must be submitted as a New proposal. Applicants must include their responses to the previous review panel summary within the Narrative document, even when submitting as New. After submitting a Resubmission, applicants must notify NIFA Program staff by email and provide the following information: 1. Application Title, 2. New grant number, and 3. Previous grant number. NIFA Program staff contact information can be found under the Program Contacts section in Appendix I: Agency Contact. 

C. Project and Grant Types

The following describes the types of projects and grants that are eligible for funding:

Project Type. Applicants must propose an Extension Project type. An Extension Project implements programs and activities that deliver science-based knowledge and informal educational programs to people, enabling them to make practical decisions.

Grant Type. Applicants must propose a Standard Grant type. A Standard Grant supports targeted original scientific Research, Education, Extension, or Integrated Projects. An eligible, individual institution, independent branch campus, or branch institution of a State system may submit a grant application for project activities to be undertaken principally on behalf of its own students or faculty, and to be managed primarily by its own personnel. The applicant executes the project without the requirement of sharing grant funds with other project partners.

  1. Extension Project Standard Grants may not exceed $450,000.
  2. Project periods for Extension Project Standard Grants range from 12 to 36 months.

D. Ethical Conduct of Funded Projects

In accordance with sections 2, 3, and 8 of 2 CFR Part 422, institutions that conduct USDA-funded extramural research must foster an atmosphere conducive to research integrity, bear primary responsibility for prevention and detection of research misconduct, and maintain and effectively communicate and train their staff regarding policies and procedures. In the event an application to NIFA results in an award, the Authorized Representative (AR) assures, through acceptance of the award, that the institution will comply with the above requirements. Award recipients must, upon request, make available to NIFA the policies, procedures, and documentation to support the conduct of the training. See Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research for further information.

PART III. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

A. Eligibility Requirements

Applicants must meet all the requirements discussed in this NOFO. Failure to meet the eligibility criteria by the application deadline may result in exclusion from consideration or preclude NIFA from making an award. For those new to Federal financial assistance, NIFA's About Grants provides highly recommended information about grants and other resources to help understand the Federal awards process.

Eligibility Type:

The following entity(ies) may apply to this NOFO: Individuals and Organizations.

 

Applications may be submitted by entities listed below:

  1. State agricultural experiment station;
  2. College and universities;
  3. University research foundation;
  4. Other research institutions and organizations;
  5. Federal agencies;
  6. National laboratories;
  7. Private organizations or corporations;
  8. Individuals; or
  9. Any group consisting of two (2) or more of the entities described in subparagraphs (A) through (H).

Award recipients may subcontract to organizations not eligible to apply provided such organizations are necessary for the conduct of the project.

USDA will not accept applications for grants and cooperative agreements submitted for dangerous gain-of-function research, as defined in Section 8 of E.O. 14292.

Duplicate or Multiple Submissions:

Submission of duplicate or predominantly overlapping applications is not allowed. NIFA will disqualify both applications if an applicant submits multiple applications that are duplicative or substantially overlapping to this program within the same FY. 

B. Cost Sharing or Matching

Match Required:

This funding opportunity announcement has no matching requirement. NIFA will not factor matching resources into the review process as an evaluation criterion. While not required, cost share is encouraged. 

C. Centers of Excellence

Pursuant to Section 7214 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 5926), NIFA will recognize and prioritize COE applicants that carry out research, extension, and education activities that relate to the food and agricultural sciences. A COE is composed of one or more of the following entities that provide financial or in-kind support to the COE. A full explanation, including the process for requesting Center of Excellence designation can be found here: Centers of Excellence (COE) or in Part IV, B of this NOFO. 

  1. State agricultural experiment stations.
  2. Colleges and universities.
  3. University research foundations.
  4. Other research institutions and organizations.
  5. Federal agencies.
  6. National laboratories.
  7. Private organizations, foundations, or corporations.
  8. Individuals; or
  9. Any group consisting of two or more of the entities described in (1) through (8).

PART IV. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION

A. Method of Application

Applicants must apply to this NOFO electronically; no other method or response is accepted. The electronic application for this NOFO and additional resources are available on Grants.gov and Grants 101Steps to Obtain Application Materials provides instructions on how to obtain an electronic application. Part III of the NIFA Grants Application Guide contains detailed information regarding the Grants.gov registration process. The NIFA Grants Application Guide is contained in the specific funding opportunity package. When applying for a NIFA award, it is important to reference the version of the guide that is included in the specific funding opportunity application package.

Steps to Obtain Application Materials:

Step One: Register

Applicant Organizations: To be eligible to apply for or receive a federal award, applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations:

  • System for Award Management (SAM):
    • Organizations must have an active SAM registration, which must be renewed annually.
    • Renewal may take as long as the initial registration.
    • Domestic organizations will be assigned a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code if they don't already have one.
  • NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code:
    • Required only for foreign organizations.
    • This code replaces the CAGE code required for SAM registration.
  • Unique Entity Identifier (UEI):
    • Issued during the SAM registration process.
    • The same UEI must be used across all registrations and on the grant application.
  • eRA Commons:
    • After obtaining a UEI, organizations can register with eRA Commons while completing their Grants.gov registration.
    • Registration must be complete before application submission.
    • Organizations must designate at least one Signing Official (SO) and one Project Director (PD) in eRA Commons when submitting an application.
  • Grants.gov:
    • Requires an active SAM registration to complete.
    • Must be finalized before submitting the application.

Important Note: Registration can take six weeks or longer, so begin the process as early as possible. All registrations must be completed before submitting your application

Project Directors (PD(s)): All PD(s) must have an active eRA Commons account.

  • Work with your organization to either:
    • Create a new account, or
    • Affiliate an existing account with the applicant organization.
  • If a PD also serves as the Signing Official, they must have two separate eRA Commons accounts, one for each role.

Important Note: Creating an eRA Commons account can take up to two weeks.

Step Two: Download Adobe

Download and Install Adobe Reader (see Adobe Software Compatibility for basic system requirements).

Step Three: Find Application

Using this funding opportunity number USDA-NIFA-KFBMB-32830, search for application here.

Step Four: Assess Readiness

Contact an Authorized Representative (AR) prior to starting an application to assess the organization's readiness to submit an electronic application.

Help and Resources:

NIFA Support

Email: grantapplicationquestions@usda.gov 

Business hours: Monday thru Friday, 7 A.M. – 5 P.M. ET, except Federal holidays.

Grants.gov Support

Grants.gov Online Support 
Telephone support: 800-518-4726
Toll-Free or 606-545-5035

Email support: support@grants.gov
Self-service customer-based support: Grants.gov iPortal

Customer service business Hours 24/7, except Federal holidays.

eRA Service Desk

Questions regarding eRA Commons and post-submission questions and inquiries

Finding help online and submitting web tickets: https://www.era.nih.gov/need-help  (preferred method of contact)
Telephone: 301-402-7469 or 866-504-9552 (Toll Free)

Business Hours: Monday - Friday, 7 A.M. - 8 P.M. ET except Federal holidays

B. Content and Form of Application

The NIFA Grants Application Guide is part of the corresponding application package for this NOFO. The NOFO overrides the NIFA Grants Application Guide if there is a discrepancy between the two documents. Applicants that do not meet the application requirements, to include partial applications, risk being excluded from NIFA's review. NIFA will assign a proposal number to all applications that meet the requirements of this NOFO. Applicants must refer to the proposal number when corresponding with NIFA. Key Application Instructions outlines key instructions for applicants.  

Key Application Instructions:

Portable Document Format (PDF):

Attachments must be in Portable Document Format (PDF). Refer to Part IV of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for additional information.

Attachments:

Check the manifest of submitted files to verify that attachments are in the correct format. Refer to Part IV of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for additional information.

Administrative Review:

Conduct an administrative review of the application before submission. Refer to Part IV of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for additional information.

Submission Instructions:

Follow the submission instructions. Refer to Part IV of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for additional information.

Email Address:

Provide an accurate email address, where designated, on the SF-424 R&R. Refer to Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for additional information.

SF 424 R&R Cover Sheet:

See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for the required certifications and assurances. 

Grants.gov Support Center:

Contact the Grants.gov Support Center for technical support and keep a record of the correspondence.

eRA Service Desk:

Contact the eRA Service Desk for questions related to eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, and post-submission inquiries.

Correspondence:

Contact NIFA if applicant does not receive correspondence from NIFA regarding an application within 30 days of the application deadline.

SF 424 R&R Project/Performance Site Location(s):

See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide.

R&R Other Project Information Form:

Field 7Project Summary (PS)/Abstract. The PS must show how the project goals align with the project goals of the FBMB program. See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for instructions and suggested templates. Applicants are strongly encouraged to use the provided templates to ensure submission and organization of accurate information in the system. The body of the PS must include the following: 1) a brief description (250 words or less) of the project that aligns with at least one of the objectives and one of the strategies listed under Part I, B of this NOFO; 2) total funding amount requested; and 3) application type (new or resubmitted).

Field 8Project Narrative (PN). The PN must not exceed 10 pages; this page limit includes the Logic Model and Project Timeline sections, as well as tables and figures. The page limit ensures fair competition. The PN must be formatted using 1-inch margins, single line spacing (i.e., no more than six lines per vertical inch), and 12-point, Times New Roman font.

A one-page Table of Contents is permitted and does not count towards the PN's 10-page limit. In the PN, do not link to external references; proposals must be self-contained.

To ensure fair competition, applications exceeding the applicable page limitation will not be accepted for review. Additionally, applications will not be accepted for review if they exceed the maximum Federal budget request for the project type proposed; if proposed objectives or approaches do not fit with the purpose and priorities of the FBMB program; or if documents are not submitted in portable document format (PDF).

Applicants must organize the PN using the sections listed below and are strongly encouraged to use the header titles below as prompts for each section:

  1. Introduction: Describe the current problem or situation to be addressed and explain why it is important. Estimate the magnitude of the problem or situation and its relevance to the audience(s). If applicable, describe the geographic area to be served. Describe the potential benefit of the proposed project to the population group or the community served.
  2. Rationale and Significance: Clearly identify which (one or more) of the objectives from Part I, B the project will address. Clearly identify which (one or more) of the strategies from Part I, B this project will address. Demonstrate an understanding of the needs of agricultural producers for farm management benchmarking capabilities and make connections to FINBIN, where possible. Describe how the project will complement or enhance resources currently available to the target audience(s). Explain any actions that have already been taken to address the problem or situation and describe any gaps that remain, and clearly describe the novel, innovative approaches that are being proposed. Provide a summary of previous work, if applicable.
  3. Project Goals, Objectives, and Intended Outcomes: Describe the goals, objectives, and intended outcomes of the project. Outcomes must describe specific changes or results that will occur because of the project and that will constitute "success" for the initiative. These may include benefits obtained by the program activities such as changes in participants' skills, behavior, or quality of life and positive changes in conditions in the community served or reductions in negative conditions. Outcomes must be specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and timely and must describe what will be accomplished along with how many people (i.e., participants) will benefit. Applicants may refer to thelogic model, an application requirement, in this section of the PN. requirements.
  4. Institutional Capacity, Roles, and Responsibilities: Describe capability and proficiency in administering a database and highlighting relevant past activities, if applicable. Provide evidence and discussion of experience and compliance with Federal reporting requirements. Describe roles and responsibilities for key staff, including the percentage of time each will dedicate to the project. Describe the fiscal and administrative oversight of the project. Explain the role of stakeholders in problem identification, planning, implementation, and evaluation, as appropriate. Applicants who intend for partners to implement portions of their proposed projects must describe each partner's roles and responsibilities. If applicable, describe relevant work that demonstrates each partner's ability to successfully execute the proposed project. Partners may jointly or individually provide leadership for different objectives or activities. If applicable, describe the roles of partners' key staff on the proposed project and the percentage of time each will dedicate to the project. 
  5. Project Sustainability: A successful project should be able to endure and outlive the one-time infusion of Federal funds. Describe steps that will be taken toward the project's sustainability beyond the life of the FBMB grant. For example, identify opportunities (e.g., resources, trainings, partnerships, collaborations, and/or funding streams) that will be explored, developed, and/or enhanced during the life of the proposed project to help sustain project operations beyond the project period. If planning to sustain only certain aspects of the project, clearly identify them.
  6. Logic Model: The logic model is a conceptual tool for planning and evaluation. It displays the sequence of actions that describe project inputs, outputs, and outcomes. Refer to the Logic Model Planning Process resource for guidance.
  7. Project Timeline: Illustrate the progress and successful implementation of the project over the award period. Describe all important phases as a function of time, year by year, for the entire project, including periods beyond the grant funding period, if appropriate. Include main project sustainability activities in the project timeline. Utilizea project start date of September 1, 2026, and develop the project timeline accordingly.
  8. Centers of Excellence Justification: If not pursuing a Centers of Excellence status, applicants must indicate their intent in this section. For applicants who desire to be considered for Centers of Excellence (COE) status, provide a brief justification statement, which describes how the standards of a COE are met based on the following criteria:
  • The ability of the COE to ensure coordination and cost-effectiveness by reducing unnecessarily duplicative efforts in the extension activities outlined in this application.
  • In addition to any applicable matching requirements, the ability of the COE to leverage available resources by using public-private partnerships among agricultural industry groups, institutions of higher education, and the Federal Government in the proposed extension activities outlined in this application. Resources leveraged should be commensurate with the size of the award.
  • The planned scope and capability of the COE to implement teaching initiatives that increase awareness and effectively disseminate solutions to target audiences through extension activities of the proposed extension activity outlined in this application;
  • The ability or capacity of the COE to increase the economic returns to rural communities by identifying, attracting, and directing funds to high-priority agricultural issues in support of and as a result of the implementation of the proposed extension activity outlined in this application; and
  • Additionally, where practicable (not required), COE applicants should describe proposed efforts to improve teaching capacity and infrastructure at colleges and universities (including Land-grant Colleges and Universities, cooperating forestry schools, certified Non-Land Grant Colleges of Agriculture (NLGCA) (list of certified NLGCA is available at NLGCA list and schools of veterinary medicine).

Field 9Bibliography & References Cited. See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide. Title the attachment as "Bibliography & References Cited" in the document header and save the file as Bibliography. There is no page limit for the Bibliography. All work cited in the proposal should be referenced in this section of the application. All references must be complete and include titles and all co-authors, conform to an acceptable journal format, and be listed in alphabetical order using the last name of the first author or listed by number in the order of citation.

Field 12Add Other Attachments. See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide.

  1. Response to Previous Review. This requirement only applies to Resubmitted Applications as described in Part II, B of this NOFO. Applicants must respond to the previous review summary, and it must not exceed one page and does not count towards the 10-page limit for the PN. The formatting requirements for the PN apply to this attachment. Title the attachment as "Response to Previous Review Proposal XXXX-XXXXX" (personalize to include the previously submitted 9-digit proposal number) in the document header and save the file as Response.
  2. Data Management Plan (DMP). A DMP is required for this program. Applicants should clearly articulate how the PD and co-PDs plan to manage and disseminate the data generated by the project. The DMP will be considered during the merit review process (see Part V, B and NIFA's Data Management Plan) and is not to exceed two pages. Title the attachment as "Data Management Plan" in the document header and save the file as DMP.
  3. Appendices to the PN. Appendices to the PN are allowed if they are directly germane to the proposed project. Do not add appendices to circumvent the page limit. Title the attachment as "Appendices to the Project Narrative" in the document header and save the file as Appendices.
  4. Key Organization Commitment. Attach signed letters from key organizations involved in the project acknowledging their contributions and/or commitment. Letters are limited to no more than two pages per key organization. Combine all letters into one file and save the file as "Letters." Other more general letters of support (i.e., from those who are not committing to a specific role in the project) are not needed and should not be included.   

Do not add any other attachments not specifically requested in this NOFO. Attaching additional narrative or figures or tables other than those specifically requested in this NOFO will result in disqualification from review. 

R&R Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded):

See Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for profile requirements, details about the biographical sketch, and suggested support templates.

All Senior/Key Persons need an eRA Commons account. 

R&R Personal Data:

This information is voluntary and is not a precondition of award (see Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide).

R&R Budget - Match:

This funding opportunity announcement does not have matching requirement.

R&R Budget - IDC:

See Part IV, C of this NOFO for funding restrictions regarding IDC, and Part V of the NIFA Grants Application Guide for additional information.

C. Funding Restrictions

Indirect Cost (IDC) is not to exceed 30 percent of the recipient's Total Federal Funds Awarded (TFFA)

7 U.S.C. 3310 limits the recovery of IDC for the overall award to 30 percent of the TFFA under a research, education, or extension grant. The maximum allowable IDC amount recoverable under the award, including the IDC charged by the subawardee(s), if any, is the lesser of the following and is determined by calculating the amount of IDC using:

  1. the sum of an institution’s negotiated indirect cost rate and the indirect cost rate charged by subawardees, if any; or
  2. 30 percent of TFFA.

If the result of number one is the lesser of the two amounts, the grant recipient is allowed to charge the negotiated IDC rate on the prime award and the subaward(s), if any. Any subawards would be subject to the subawardee’s negotiated IDC rate. The subawardee may charge its negotiated IDC rate on its portion of the award, provided the sum of the IDC amount charged under the award by the prime awardee and the subawardee(s) does not exceed 30 percent of the TFFA.

If the result of number two is the lesser of the two amounts, then the maximum IDC allowed for the overall award, including any subaward(s), is limited to 30 percent of the TFFA. That is, the IDC of the prime awardee plus the sum of the IDC charged by the subawardee(s), if any, may not exceed 30 percent of the TFFA.

In the event of an award, the prime awardee is responsible for ensuring the maximum indirect cost allowed for the award is not exceeded when combining IDC for the Federal portion (i.e., prime and subawardee(s)) and any applicable cost-sharing. Amounts exceeding the maximum allowable IDC are considered unallowable. See sections 408 and 410 of 2 CFR 200.

If the applicant does not have a negotiated rate and NIFA is the cognizant agency, the applicant may request an IDC rate. Applicants are not required to complete the IDC package during the application process and need only to calculate a rate to serve as a basis for requesting IDC. If awarded, the applicant will be required to submit a complete IDC proposal package to obtain a negotiated rate.

Organizations that do not have a current negotiated (including provisional) rate may elect the de minimis rate (2 CFR 200.414(f)). The Uniform Guidance offers the option of electing to charge a de minimis rate of 15 percent of modified total direct costs (MTDC), which may be used indefinitely. As described above and in 2 CFR 200.403, costs must be charged consistently as either indirect or direct costs but may not be double-charged or inconsistently charged as both. If elected, this methodology must be used consistently for all Federal awards until such time as a non-Federal entity chooses to negotiate for a rate, which it may do at any time.

See NIFA Indirect Costs for information including additional resources and NIFA Indirect Cost Guidance Chart.

NIFA awards may not be used to support the procurement of unmanned aircraft systems to process, store, or transmit Federal information (as defined in OMB Circular A-130) unless the grant is specifically available for procurement of such equipment and grantees describe in their application how they will comply with the information security requirements outlined in Appendix B of M-26-02 Ensuring Government Use of Secure Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Supporting United States Producers and develop a risk-based approach to applying those requirements to procurement solicitations to potential vendors under the resulting Federal award.  This information, if provided, will be evaluated by NIFA as part of its evaluation process.  If such procurement is approved, specific information security requirements may be included in the terms and conditions of the grant to ensure that the grantees will incorporate those requirements in procurement solicitations of unmanned aircraft systems under the Federal award.

Authorizing Legislation:

Funding shall not be used for the construction of a new building or facility or the acquisition, expansion, remodeling, or alteration of an existing building or facility (including site grading and improvement, and architect fees).

PART V. APPLICATION REVIEW REQUIREMENTS

A. NIFA's Evaluation Process

NIFA evaluates each application in a two-part process. First, we screen each application to ensure that it meets the administrative requirements set forth in this NOFO. All administrative requirements must be met in order for the application to proceed to the next level of review. Second, a scientific peer-review process will be used to technically evaluate applications that have met the administrative requirements using a review panel (see NIFA Peer Review Process).

Scientific Peer Review Process:

NIFA selects reviewers for the review panel based upon their training and experience in relevant scientific, extension, or education fields, taking into account the following factors:

  1. The level of relevant formal scientific, technical education, or extension experience of the individual, as well as the extent to which an individual is engaged in relevant research, education, or extension activities.
  2. The need to include experts from various areas of specialization within relevant scientific, education, or extension fields.
  3. The need to include other experts (e.g., agricultural producers, range or forest managers/operators, researchers, educators, evaluators, and consumers) who can assess relevance of the applications to targeted audiences and to program needs.
  4. The need to include experts from a variety of organizational types (e.g., colleges, universities, industry, state and Federal agencies, and private profit and non-profit organizations) and geographic locations.
  5. The need to maintain a balanced composition with regard to the reviewer's area of expertise, geographic area, and entity type, as appropriate.
  6. The need to include reviewers who can judge the effective usefulness of each application to producers and the general public.

After each peer review panel has completed its deliberations, the responsible program staff of NIFA will recommend that your project is either approved for support from currently available funds or declined due to insufficient funds or unfavorable review.

NIFA reserves the right to negotiate with the PD/PI and/or the submitting organization or institution regarding project revisions (e.g., reductions in the scope of work, funding level, period, or method of support) prior to recommending any project for funding.

After the review process has been completed, NIFA sends copies of reviews, not including the identity of reviewers, and a summary (if applicable) of the review panel comments to the PD.
 

Conflicts of Interest:

NIFA takes extreme care to prevent any actual or perceived conflicts of interest that may influence the review or evaluation (see NIFA Peer Review Process for Competitive Grant Applications).

B. Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation Criteria:

NIFA will use the following criteria to evaluate and score applications to this funding opportunity.

 
Maximum Points: 20

Potential for Maintaining and/or Expanding the Established National Farm Financial Management Database (FINBIN). The extent to which the project will support, expand, and/or improve the database and enhance its usefulness to help producers improve farm management knowledge and skills and to include a variety of crops and livestock throughout multiple regions of the United States. The project addresses at least one objective and at least one strategy as listed in Part I, B. The project is novel and/or innovative, timely, and relevant. The need for and the scope of the project are justified, and the current problem or situation to be addressed is clear. Preliminary data and/or other past activities are used to substantiate the need for the project. The project goals, objectives, and outcomes are reasonable and achievable. The project will increase the number or varietyof farms and ranches represented in the database, including farm types, commodities produced, or increase farm numbers from additional States or regions. The logic model adequately describes the project.


 
Maximum Points: 20

Project Implementation. The extent to which the project will be implemented in the time proposed. The activities are aligned with the goals, objectives, and outcomes. The project includes methodologies that will help producers better use or access the database. The outputs and/or deliverables are sound and relevant. The project's scope is appropriate to produce expected outcomes and/or changes in knowledge, awareness, attitudes, and/or behaviors in targeted populations. Limitations and challenges are addressed. The project timeline adequately addresses key milestones.  

The Data Management Plan is clear, robust, and consistent with NIFA requirements, including strategies for ensuring data accuracy, confidentiality, documentation, long-term accessibility, and compliance with federal standards. The DMP demonstrates how financial and benchmarking data will be collected, validated, protected, and shared in ways that support FBMB goals, improving the quality, consistency, and national availability of farm financial information. The proposed data practices enhance the usefulness of benchmarking outputs for U.S. farmers and ranchers, contribute to the national farm financial database, and strengthen producer education and farm management decision-making.


 
Maximum Points: 20

Project Evaluation Activities. The extent to which the project outcomes will be measured. The project includes evaluation activities that are practical and appropriate for the activities. The project identifies which key person(s) on the project team will monitor project performance. The project incorporates adequate performance measurements, and there is sufficient capacity to measure the extent to which project objectives are met. The project uses appropriate evaluation methodologies to address the effectiveness of its strategy/strategies to meet its objective(s). Strengths and limitations of the proposed evaluation approach(es) are addressed.


 
Maximum Points: 20

Key Persons and Organization Support. The PD, co-PD(s), and key persons are qualified and have the necessary expertise to carry out the project, which includes implementing project activities and supporting evaluation. The number of persons involved in the project is adequate. The applicant's institution is committed to the project, and the institutional resources (e.g., administrative, facilities, equipment, materials) available to carry out the project is adequate. The contributions to farm management education programs or associations will expand the quantity and types of data in the national farm financial database. If a partner organization or organizations will be included in the implementation of the project, their involvement, including roles and responsibilities, is clear and defined. Letters of commitment from partners are included.


 
Maximum Points: 20

Budget. The budget for accomplishing project goals, objectives, and outcomes is realistic, achievable, and cost-effective. The project maximizes the use of limited resources and optimizes educational value for the dollar.


C. Organizational Management Information

Applicants must submit specific management information prior to an award and update the information as needed. Applicants may only need to provide an update if there was a change in previously provided information under this or another NIFA program. NIFA provides the requisite forms during the pre-award process. Although an applicant may be eligible for award under this program, there are factors that may exclude an applicant from receiving Federal financial and nonfinancial assistance and benefits under this program (e.g., debarment or suspension of an individual, or a determination that an applicant is not responsible).

D. Application Disposition

Applicants may withdraw at any time before NIFA makes a final funding decision. NIFA will retain all applications, including withdrawn applications and unfunded applications.

PART VI. AWARD ADMINISTRATION

A. General

Within the limit of funds authorized, the NIFA awarding official will make grants to responsible and eligible applicants whose applications are judged most meritorious under the procedures set forth in this NOFO. The date specified by the NIFA awarding official as the effective date of the grant must be no later than September 30 of the federal fiscal year in which the project is approved for support and funds are appropriated for such purpose, unless otherwise permitted by law. The project need not be initiated on the grant effective date, but as soon thereafter as practical so that project goals may be attained within the funded project period. All funds granted by NIFA under this NOFO may be used only for the purpose for which they are granted in accordance with the approved application and budget, regulations, terms and conditions of the award, applicable federal cost principles, USDA assistance regulations, and NIFA General Awards Administration Provisions, 7 CFR Part 3430, subparts A through E.

Award Notice:

The award document will provide pertinent instructions and information as described in 2 CFR 200.211 (see NIFA's Terms and Conditions).

B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements 

Several federal statutes and regulations apply to grant applications and the projects outlined in this NOFO (some are listed here: Federal Regulations). Unless specifically noted by statute or award-specific requirements, NIFA Federal Assistance Policy Guide applies to all NIFA awards.

C. Expected Program Outputs and Reporting Requirements

Output and reporting requirements are included in the award terms and conditions. If there are any program or award-specific award terms, they will be identified in the Award Notice.

PART VII. OTHER INFORMATION

A. Use of Funds and Changes in Budget

Delegation of fiscal responsibility:

Unless the terms and conditions of the award state otherwise, awardees may not in whole or in part delegate or transfer to another person, institution, or organization the responsibility for use or expenditure of award funds.

Changes in Budget or Project Plans:

In accordance with 2 CFR 200.308, awardees must request prior approval from NIFA for the following program or budget-related reasons (the awardee is subject to the terms and conditions identified in the award):

  1. Change in the scope or the objective of the project or program without prior written approval (even if there is no associated budget revision required);
  2. Change in a key person specified in the application or the federal award;
  3. Disengagement from the project for more than three months, or a 25 percent reduction in time devoted to the project;
  4. Inclusion of costs that require prior approval in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E (Cost Principles), or 2 CFR Part 300 Appendix IX, or 48 CFR, unless waived by the Federal awarding agency, 48 CFR Part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures;
  5. Transfer of funds budgeted for participant support costs to other categories of expense (2 CFR 200.456 Participant support costs);
  6. Subawarding, transferring or contracting out of any work under a federal award, including fixed amount subawards (see 2 CFR 200.333, Fixed Amount Subawards), unless described in the application and funded in the approved federal awards. This provision does not apply to the acquisition of supplies, material, equipment, or general support services;
  7. Changes in the approved cost-sharing or matching provided by the non-federal entity;
  8. The need for additional federal funds to complete the project;
  9. Salary rates of pay exceeding an Executive Level IV salary range (see "Rates of Pay for the Executive Schedule" under the "Executive & Senior Level Employee Pay Tables" header at https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/) require prior NIFA approval. This rate does not include any fringe benefits, general and administrative (G&A), overhead, or other expenses. Requests for approval must include the salary rate of pay and a justification for the rate and be sent to the Authorized Departmental Officer (ADO) to awards@usda.gov;
  10. No more than 50 percent of the total dollars of this award may be subcontracted to another party(ies) without prior written approval of the ADO, except subcontracts to Federal agencies.
  11. Transferring funds between the construction and non-construction work under a Federal award; and
  12. A no-cost extension (meaning, an extension of time that does not require the obligation of additional Federal funds) of the period of performance, other than any one-time extension authorized by the Federal agency in accordance with paragraph 2 CFR 200.308(g)(2). All requests for no-cost extensions should be submitted at least 10 calendar days before the conclusion of the period of performance. The Federal agency may approve multiple no-cost extensions under a Federal award if not prohibited by Federal statute or regulation.

B. Confidential Aspects of Applications and Awards

When an application results in an award, it becomes a part of NIFA transaction records, which are available to the public. Information that the Secretary of Agriculture determines to be confidential, privileged, or proprietary in nature will be held in confidence to the extent permitted by law. Therefore, applicants should clearly mark any information within the application they wish to have considered as confidential, privileged, or proprietary. NIFA will retain a copy of an application that does not result in an award for three years. Such an application will be released only with the consent of the applicant or to the extent required by law. An applicant may withdraw at any time prior to the final action thereon.

C. Regulatory Information

This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with state and local officials. Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the collection of information requirements contained in this notice have been approved under OMB Document No. 0524- 0039.

D. Language Access Services

NIFA offers language access services, such as interpretation and translation of vital information, free of charge. If you need interpretation or translation services, please visit NIFA Language Access Services.

APPENDIX I: AGENCY CONTACT

Program Contacts:

Dr. Rodney Vance, National Program Leader, rodney.vance@usda.gov 

Dr. Jessica Turner, Program Specialist, jessica.turner@usda.gov 

Administrative Contact:

For administrative questions related to:

  1. Grants.gov, see Part IV of this NOFO.
  2. Other NOFO or application questions, please email grantapplicationquestions@usda.gov.
  3. Awards under this NOFO, please email awards@usda.gov
U.S. Postal Mailing Address:

National Institute of Food and Agriculture
U.S. Department of Agriculture
P.O. Box 419205, MS 10000 
Kansas City, MO 64141-6205

Courier/Package Delivery Address:

National Institute of Food and Agriculture
U.S. Department of Agriculture
2312 East Bannister Road, MS 10000
Kansas City, MO 64141-3061

APPENDIX II: GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Glossary of Terms:
  • Assistance Listing Number – ALN
  • Authorized Departmental Officer – ADO
  • Authorized Representative – AR
  • Centers of Excellence – COE
  • Data Management Plan – DMP
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture – NIFA
  • Notice of Funding Opportunity – NOFO
  • Research, Education, and Economics – REE
  • United States Department of Agriculture – USDA

APPENDIX III: DEFINITIONS

(Refer to 7 CFR 3430 Competitive and Noncompetitive Non-formula Federal Assistance Programs – General Award Administrative Provisions for additional definitions) 

Definitions:
  • Matching: The process through which a grant recipient matches awarded USDA funds with cash and in-kind contributions on a dollar-for-dollar basis. The matching funds must derive from non-Federal sources.
  • New Application: An application not previously submitted to a program.
  • Resubmitted Application: A project application that was previously submitted to a program, but the application was not funded.