National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Note: Not all NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices (ICOs) participate in Announcements. Applicants should carefully note which ICOs participate in this announcement and view their respective areas of research interest at the ICO-Specific Scientific Interests website. ICOs that do not participate in this announcement will not consider applications for funding.
UM1 Research Project with Complex Structure Cooperative Agreement
Only one application per institution is allowed as defined in Part 2, Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.
Through this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), the National Cancer Institute (NCI) solicits applications from institutions/organizations that propose to maintain or establish Lead Academic Organizations (LAOs) as part of the NCI Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN). ETCTN LAOs will design, develop, monitor, conduct, and analyze early phase clinical trials (e.g., phase 0, phase 1, phase 2, pilot, and other experimental therapeutic clinical trials) involving agents under regulatory sponsorship for New Investigational Drug (IND) applications held by NCI's Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD), Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP). Each ETCTN LAO will participate in clinical trials it leads as well as clinical trials led by other LAOs in the network.
To develop the means to cure as many cancer patients as possible and to control the disease in those patients who are not cured.
| Application Due Dates | Review and Award Cycles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New | Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed) | AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed | Scientific Merit Review | Advisory Council Review | Earliest Start Date |
| June 30, 2026 | June 30, 2026 | Not Applicable | November 2026 | January 2027 | April 2027 |
All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
No late applications will be accepted for this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO).
Not Applicable
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).
Conformance to all requirements (both in the How to Apply - Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the How to Apply - Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.
Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity.
The purpose of this Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) is to solicit applications to maintain or establish Lead Academic Organizations (LAOs) as part of the NCI Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN). ETCTN LAOs will design, develop, monitor, conduct, and analyze early phase clinical trials (e.g., phase 0, phase 1, phase 2, pilot, and other experimental therapeutic clinical trials) involving agents under regulatory sponsorship for New Investigational Drug (IND) applications held by NCI's Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD), Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP). Each ETCTN LAO will participate in clinical trials it leads as well as clinical trials led by other LAOs in the network.
The ETCTN LAOs will provide oversight for all scientific, programmatic, financial, and administrative matters related to the sites participating in ETCTN trials as part of their LAOs. ETCTN LAOs are also expected to provide mentorship for investigators who are in the early stages of their research careers with a focus on clinical trials. All ETCTN LAOs will be required to use the ETCTN Pharmacokinetic (PK) Resource Laboratory as a central resource to incorporate PK studies within their early phase clinical trials, when appropriate, to analyze pharmacokinetic endpoints, drug-drug interactions, cytochromes P450 (CYP) interactions, pharmacodynamics, and food effects associated with IND agents being evaluated in ETCTN trials. This PK Laboratory will conduct all pharmacokinetic studies for ETCTN clinical trials involving Investigational New Drug (IND) agents under the regulatory sponsorship of NCIs Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD), Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP). The ETCTN Pharmacokinetic Resource Laboratory is funded through a separate award under the NOFO listed below.
Since the early 1970s, NCI's Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) in the Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) has managed an early phase experimental therapeutics program that has contributed to the clinical development of anticancer agents. Through the years, NCI has formed partnerships with pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, and individual investigators to evaluate innovative cancer therapies and in 2014, the ETCTN was created to enhance more rapid evaluation of these therapies using a coordinated, collaborative, and inclusive team-based approach to early phase experimental clinical trials and biomarker/pharmacodynamic assessment.
The current ETCTN and its supporting infrastructure provides an established system for early-stage clinical development of novel anticancer treatments that are then evaluated in clinical trials conducted under DCTD/CTEP Investigational New Drug (IND) applications in national, high-priority areas of unmet medical need. The ETCTN also uses NCI resources to molecularly characterized tumors to identify appropriate biomarkers that can be used to select patients most likely to respond to specific agents. ETCTN clinical studies determine the safety of IND agent drug combinations, find early signals of clinical activity of these agents in targeted populations, and perform in-depth analysis of biomarkers of response and resistance. DCTD/CTEP currently holds approximately 210 INDs for investigational oncology agents/combinations which involve about 100 collaborative agreements with pharmaceutical/biotechnology companies. Agents under evaluation include, but are not limited to, small molecules, immune-oncology agents, antibodies, targeted toxins, oligonucleotides, and gene transfer agents. Through this program, hundreds of agents and agent combinations have been made available for collaborative agent development within CTEP. Effective development of these agents requires a systematic development plan for phase 1 and pilot trials, followed by phase 2 trials that, it is hoped, will conclude with definitive evaluation in phase 3 trials. The major focus of the ETCTN is on the science of clinical trial design to provide dose optimization for drug development of new cancer treatments using a team-science approach and with outreach to representative patient populations for clinical trial participation. The ETCTN's specific goals are to:
Each Lead Academic Organization (LAO) receiving an award under this NOFO has a roster of clinical site(s) that enroll patients to trials conducted across the network (i.e., ETCTN LAO) that consist of one or more of the following:
The NCI Experimental Therapeutics (NEXT) Program selects agents for NCI-sponsored pre-clinical and clinical development. NCI negotiates Collaborative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs) to develop and evaluate these agents under DCTD/CTEP IND within the ETCTN. CTEP then sets up an NCI Drug Development Project Team (which ETCTN LAOs are expected to participate in) to develop an initial drug development plan for the new agent(s) with an accompanying biomarker assay development plan (if warranted) that is presented to the Investigational Drug Steering Committee for evaluation. If the development plan(s) are approved, the ETCTN LAOs may then submit proposals for ETCTN clinical trials using CTEP IND agents. There are 2 pathways for submitting request letters for NCI approval:
ETCTN LAOs are expected to encourage submission of appropriate requests with an Early Career Clinical Investigator or ECI (defined as an investigator who has completed post-oncology fellowship training within the past 10 years and who has not previously competed successfully as a Principal Investigator (PI) for a substantial independent NIH research award) as the PI for the trial. All requests with an ECI as a PI include an experienced investigator serving as mentor who provides significant direction, feedback, and oversight to the ECI. Study PIs may be affiliated with either the LAO or a participating AO; however, the LAO has complete responsibility for the trial. For details, see required Other Attachments in Section IV of this NOFO.
Each submitted request letter is subject to review through standard procedures. If NCI and the NCI's pharmaceutical partner(s) approve a request letter, the study team works with the CTEP Central Protocol Writing Service (CPWS) to develop a protocol and consent. NCI, the pharmaceutical partners, the NCI CIRB (and other organizations as needed, including the FDA) review these documents and provide required and recommended changes that the LAO must address before CTEP will approve the protocol for activation within the ECTN. LAOs are responsible for monitoring the entire protocol development process for the trial to ensure the process meets Operational Efficiency Working Group (OEWG) timelines for early phase clinical trial development.
LAOs are expected to lead a broad and diverse portfolio of ETCTN trials. All ETCTN trials use the Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU) Oncology Patient Enrollment Network (OPEN) system to enroll patients. OPEN is integrated with an Interactive Web Response System (IWRS) for slot reservations and cohort management in ETCTN trials. Enrollment data automatically transfers to CTEP's clinical data management system (CDMS) used by the ETCTN. The NCI Clinical Trials Monitoring Service (CTMS) builds and manages the study databases for ETCTN trials from a library of standardized case report forms. DCTD/CTEP convenes a Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) or Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) as needed to oversee randomized phase 2 ETCTN trials.
The study team is responsible for tracking patient enrollments and working to ensure trial accrual meets the targeted accrual rate as well as monitoring trial data in CTEP's CDMS and other systems, providing updates and responding to inquiries from DCTD/CTEP as the IND sponsor in a timely manner, and generally ensuring the trial follows the approved study design. The study team may need to amend the protocol over time for various reasons (e.g., to incorporate new safety information into the trial, respond to changes in science, make changes to enhance accrual to the trial).
Also, although adolescents may be included in some ETCTN trials, pediatric-focused studies are not within the primary scope of the ETCTN. NCI conducts pediatric-focused early phase clinical trials through other NCI-funded mechanisms such as the Pediatric Early Phase Clinical Trials Network.
Patient specimens from ETCTN trials are tracked via the ETCTN Specimen Tracking System (STS). ETCTN trial specimens are banked centrally in the Early-Phase and Experimental Clinical Trials (EET) biospecimen bank before distribution for protocol-specified analyzes.
Although NCI DCTD/CTEP is the regulatory sponsor for all ETCTN IND trials, the ETCTN LAO is responsible for ensuring its ETCTN clinical trials and all related research complies with all applicable FDA regulations for IND studies as well as NIH, NCI, and CTEP policies. The ETCTN LAO is responsible for registering, updating, and reporting results in ClinicalTrials.gov.
ETCTN LAOs are expected to open and enroll patients to trials from across the network. To open and participate in ETCTN trials:
In addition to LAO monitoring and oversight of their sites (AOs and/or ICs), CTEP conducts additional monitoring as well as auditing for all ETCTN trials and sites.
It is essential that all ETCTN LAO sites (LAO, AOs, and ICs) have access to and use of a pharmacy to conduct investigational drug pharmacy operations required to adequately fulfill obligations related to investigational agents. The investigational pharmacy operations must be able to adequately fulfill obligations related to investigational agents, security, assuring proper transfer and/or final disposition of investigational agents, and adherence to local, state, and federal regulations. The investigational pharmacy must have the capability to use the AURORA system, the centralized agent inventory management system for CTEP-sponsored clinical trials using DCTD/CTEP IND agents supplied by the DCTD/CTEP Pharmaceutical Management Branch. Additionally, each institution must have access to and use of a pharmacy for the use and dispensing of investigational radiopharmaceuticals used in the conduct of clinical trials.
ETCTN LAOs and its sites must also have the ability to support clinical trials by various laboratory testing of clinical biospecimens, including testing of biospecimens for integral biomarker assays in laboratories certified under CLIA Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). This also includes a requisite expertise in acquiring fresh biopsy specimens from a high percentage of patients enrolled on clinical trials, including via invasive procedures, if warranted. Interactions with Other NCI-supported Programs: In addition to NCI DCTD/CTEP staff and the ETCTN Lead Academic Organization and their participating sites, other NCI grant and contract-supported programs as well as NCI Program Advisory Committees having important supporting roles in carrying out the research objectives of the ETCTN. Thus, the PK Laboratory is required to interact, as appropriate, with such entities/programs as the DCTD Biometric Research Program (BRP); DCTD Cancer Diagnosis Program (CDP); Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU) with its Regulatory Support Services (RSS); NCI Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB); the ETCTN Clinical Data Management System (CDMS); the ETCTN Clinical Trials Monitoring Service (CTMS); and the NCTN Radiotherapy and Imaging Core Services Center (IROC).
Applicants must be able to organize and implement a comprehensive infrastructure program for the conduct of high-quality clinical trials evaluating novel anticancer agents. Thus, the proposed ETCTN LAO must be able to serve as the major resource for rapid, efficient, systematic evaluation and determination of optimal dose/schedule and safety/efficacy for specific agents and combinations of investigational agents sponsored under DCTD/CTEP INDs, as well as disease-specific treatment evaluation. To facilitate these responsibilities, the NCI DCTD/CTEP provides ETCTN awardees with standardized central operational, regulatory, and administrative support (through separate contracts beyond the scope of this NOFO, see: NCI ETCTN Program Infrastructure | Initiatives/Programs | CTEP.)
Applicants for this NOFO for ETCTN Lead Academic Organizations (LAOs) are expected to present an overview and address the following 3 functional components:
Investigators proposing NIH-defined clinical trials may refer to the Research Methods Resources website for information about developing statistical methods and study designs.
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Cooperative Agreement: A financial assistance mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities. See Section VI.2 for additional information about the substantial involvement for this NOFO.
The OER Glossary and the How to Apply - Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.
Required: Only accepting applications that propose clinical trial(s).
NCI intends to commit $11.8 million in FY 2027 to fund four to six awards.
Application budgets are not limited but need to reflect the actual needs of the proposed project.
The total project period requested may not exceed 6 years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.
Higher Education Institutions - Includes all types
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
Small Businesses
Federal Governments
Other
Eligible institution/organization for the purposes of this application is defined as an academic center/organization in the United States or Canada providing direct medical care to patients that is considered one integral organizational entity under a single financial management system and governance structure. A center/organization (e.g., an academic hospital and/or academic clinic program) for this application is distinguished from large medical centers whose primary mission is patient care. In addition to patient care, academic centers/organizations have comprehensive medical training programs, investigational pharmacies, advanced imaging facilities, and preclinical laboratories that perform basic research.
The only Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Institutions) allowed in response to this NOFO are Canadian Institutions.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are not allowed.
NIH will no longer issue awards (i.e., new, renewal, or non-competing continuation) to domestic or foreign entities that involve foreign subawards/subcontracts. All NIH-funded research involving foreign subawards/subcontracts must be submitted in response to a NOFO that is specifically designated for funded international collaborations. See NIH Grants Policy Statement 16.8 Collaborative International Research Awards.
Applications involving foreign subawards/subcontracts submitted in response to this NOFO will be deemed noncompliant and will not be considered for funding. This policy applies to all monetary international collaborations resulting in foreign subawards/subcontracts, however, it does not preclude unfunded international collaborations or foreign components, funding for foreign consultants, or procurement of unique equipment or supplies from foreign vendors.
Applicant Organizations
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
All PD(s)/PI(s) must be registered with ORCID. The personal profile associated with the PD(s)/PI(s) eRA Commons account must be linked to a valid ORCID ID. For more information on linking an ORCID ID to an eRA Commons personal profile see the ORCID topic in our eRA Commons online help.
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the How to Apply - Application Guide.
Any individual designated as a PD/PI on an application for this ETCTN Lead Academic Organization (LAO) NOFO must not be a PD/PI on an application for any other ETCTN LAO or for the ETCTN Pharmacokinetic Resource Laboratory (U24 Clinical Trials Not Allowed) RFA-CA-27-017.
If the ETCTN LAO application contact PD/PI is not a practicing physician, a practicing physician(s) must be designated to be responsible for overseeing the clinical trials and patient management. This practicing physician must have primary affiliation with the institution submitting the application(i.e., the LAO institution).
This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.
Only one application per institution (normally identified by having a unique DUNS number or NIH IPF number) is allowed.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:
The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise (in this NOFO, in a policy notice, or other notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to the requirements in the How to Apply - Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
All page limitations described in the How to Apply – Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
For this specific NOFO, the Research Strategy Section is limited to 30 pages.
The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply – Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Facilities & Other Resources: Provide a succinct description of the early phase clinical trial related resources, infrastructure and facilities that are available at the proposed LAO as its roster sites (LAO ICs, AOs, and AO ICs), including but not limited to investigational pharmacies for experimental agents, state-of-the art radiological imaging, radiotherapy delivery, and biospecimen procurement and handling facilities.
Other Attachments: ETCTN LAO applicants must provide the following attachments. Applications that do not include these attachments will be deemed incomplete and withdrawn by CSR before review. The filename provided must be used for each attachment, as it will become a bookmark in the application.
Attachment 1. Organizational Chart, Logistical Planning, and ETCTN LAO Roster (use filename OrgChartandRoster)
Attachment 2. Communications Information (use filename Communications)
Attachment 3. Regulatory Data (use filename RegulatoryInformation):
Attachment 4. Standard Operating Procedures Data (use filename ListSOPs)
Attachment 5. Capabilities and Performance (use filename CapabilityPerformance)
Data on the capabilities and available resources for specific functional units of the ETCTN LAO applicant should be provided in this Attachment. Relevant, optional information may be provided in tabular form as listed below. Use of the tables is encouraged with clear column headings to describe content. Furthermore, it is suggested that applicants limit the information listed to the top 50 trials and provide only summary information/numbers for the remaining studies. Please use rolling headers for multi-page tables and provide summary totals when applicable.
Attachment 6: Important Primary Scientific Achievements (use filename: PrimaryAchievements):
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Designate an appropriately qualified PD/PI (or multiple PDs/PIs) for the proposed ETCTN LAO. For applications with multiple PDs/PIs, applicants may wish to consider designating a PD/PI as primarily responsible for phase 1 trials and another primarily responsible for phase 2 trials.
The LAO and/or its AO(s) should identify at least one statistician with the skill and expertise in the design and monitoring of early phase clinical trials including adaptive and other designs for phase 1 and 2 trials to support the clinical activities of the site or consortium. Proposed ETCTN sites are expected to have the requisite statistical expertise for trial design/monitoring and coordinating patient enrollment on all clinical trials open in the ETCTN.
Sites with a unique interest in the development of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals in combinations with CTEP-IND agents are encouraged to include radiation oncologists as key personnel.
For each LAO-based team, the applicant may wish to consider designating Senior/Key Persons in the following categories, as needed for the LAO's drug development goals:
For each participating AO, the applicant may wish to consider designating Senior/Key Persons in the following categories, as needed:
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
The requested budgets should take into consideration the standardized central operational, regulatory and administrative support that will be provided to ETCTN LAO awardees by NCI. These services will be directly funded by the NCI and respective cost must not be included in the LAO requested budgets.
Senior/Key Persons and Other Personnel. Costs should include estimated costs of salary support (based on level-of-effort) for the PD(s)/PI(s) and other Senior/Key Persons responsible for various aspects of early drug development (but not personnel costs directly related to the conduct of clinical trials at the clinical level).
Each individual designated as a PD/PI must commit a minimum of 1.2 person-months of effort per year. This minimal effort level must be maintained throughout the entire project period.
Other designated Senior/Key Persons (e.g., Disease-Focused Clinical Investigators, Translational Scientists, Interventional Radiologists, Research Pathologists) are expected to commit a minimum of 0.6 person-months of effort each per year. Senior/Key Biostatisticians for the LAO may warrant a higher level of commitment of up to 1.2 person-months of effort per year or more depending on the number of trials the LAO expects to lead. Senior/Key Persons should receive partial salary support. The effort level requested should be commensurate with the projected scale of accrual to and opening of clinical trials.
General determination of level of overall funding. The applicant can allocate the total cost amount across all allowable cost categories in any amount or distribution pattern that the applicant believes is appropriate. The applicant can request more (or less) than the estimated amounts with appropriate budget justification. However, budgets are based on estimated ranges costs associated with enrollment of patients on a per-case basis. To justify the budget, the applicant needs to describe in detail in the budget justification the number of patients expected to be accrued for treatment trials in the category of treatment intervention, and for one patient biospecimen collection (including cost of a research biopsy) for each enrollment of a patient on a treatment trial at the various participating sites on the LAO's roster.
The budget should also include funding to be allocated to support research and development, and ETCTN collaboration (in addition to support for scientific leadership, administrative and regulatory activities, data analysis, etc.). All costs for Electronic Medical Record (EMR) builds to launch early phase clinical trials as well as mailing or handling research-related patient specimens, forms, and materials should be included. Other consulting costs should be outlined. Costs for non-accrual activities such as protocol development, statistics and data analysis, protocol submissions to the NCI CIRB (or other IRB for Canadian sites), amendment distribution and continuing review, site training, pharmacy set-up, and site administration for the institution(s) to support participation in early-phase experimental therapeutic clinical trials should be included. It is anticipated that each LAO might submit up to 2 Request for Collaborative Research under CTEP IND Agent(s) per quarter with 3 to 4 Request for Collaborative Research under CTEP IND Agent(s) approved for further development annually. An annual accrual rate of at least 80 to 100 patients per year by the entire LAO roster should be assumed. It is also assumed about 30% of the total accrual would come from ETCTN trials not led by the applicant LAO but by other ETCTN LAOs in the network.
Provide the cost for each main budget category (personnel, supplies, travel, etc.) as appropriate. Costs of the integration of the informatics system with the services provided by the NCI DCTD/CTEP Clinical Trials Monitoring Service (see: http://ctep.cancer.gov/branches/ctmb/resources.htm) and/or costs for additional on-site data management may be included but only for very well-justified on-site expenses.
Funds for travel. Funding should be budgeted for the ETCTN LAO PD(s)/PI(s) to travel to two meetings per year, with one being the NCI/CTEP Early Drug Development (EDD) meeting. Travel funds for four representatives from the ETCTN LAO, AO, and/or IC sites [exclusive of the ETCTN LAO PD(s)/PI(s)] to attend the NCI/CTEP Early Drug Development (EDD) each year should be provided as well as travel costs for two presenters to major national/international meetings per year.
Clinical Trials Research Operations and Research Related Hospital Charges. Requested funds for clinical trials operations must be to support institutional costs of research that are not considered a cost of treatment by medical insurers, and therefore are not reimbursed by insurers (e.g., blood and urine collection and shipping, tumor tissue handling and shipping to the tissue bank, performing research biopsies, performing research imaging studies, etc.). The anticipated total annual expenses for these costs should be based on per-patient costs of the accrual, assuming at least 80 to 100 patients per year and should be broken out by category (e.g., tissue acquisition consisting of research biopsies, tissue handling, shipping of tissues, research imaging studies, etc.). It is anticipated that studies would have on an average 1 to 2 biopsies per patient over the course of a trial.
Provide a detailed breakout of costs used to estimate the per-patient accrual costs in the budget justification. The net per-patient cost for accrual to ETCTN clinical trials regardless of phase (i.e., excluding the costs of laboratory studies) multiplied by the expected number of patients to be accrued (at least 80 to 100 per year) should be approximated as part of the entire budgetary request.
The requested budget items shall NOT include or reflect any costs for the following activities:
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Specific Aims:
Provide Specific Aims for the entire application. Include key benchmarks such as expected number of clinical trials (by phases) and participant accrual levels.
Research Strategy:
Organize the Research Strategy with sub-sections aligned with each of the functional components/elements listed below. Start each sub-section with the appropriate functional component/element heading.
Sub-Section A: Overview
Sub-Section B: Organizational Structure and Management Core
Sub-Section C: Clinical Trial Development and Operations Core
Describe how the LAO provides the scientific expertise and operational efficiency for a team-science approach for the development of clinical trials and their conduct in the ETCTN by addressing the major areas listed below.
Clinical Trial Development
Statistical Support, Data Management, Data Monitoring and Regulatory Compliance for Clinical Trial Conduct
Biospecimen/Tissue Acquisition and Molecular Characterization
Sub-Section D: Member Site Accrual and Performance Core
Sub-section E: Progress Report (for Renewals Only):
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
Other Research Plan Section: Consortium / Contractual Arrangements
Describe the programmatic, fiscal, and administrative arrangements agreed upon between the applicant LAO institution and any AO(s). LAO award recipients will be required to submit all agreements to NCI DCTD/CTEP for review.
Other Research Plan Section: Letters of Support
The applicant LAO institution must provide a Letter of Support documenting the following:
Each AO institution proposed as part of this LAO application must provide a Letter of Support documenting the following:
Other Plan(s):
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply - Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:
If you answered Yes to the question Are Human Subjects Involved? on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.
Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Given that applicants should not propose any specific clinical trials at the time of application, the Study Record should NOT be completed.
Delayed Onset Study
Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
The following additional instructions are provided for Delayed Onset Study section for this NOFO:
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
Foreign (non-U.S.) organizations must follow policies described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, and procedures for foreign organizations described throughout the How to Apply Application Guide.
See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov
Part I. contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIHs electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply – Application Guide.
This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the How to Apply - Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organizations profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by components of participating organizations, NIH. Applications that are incomplete, non-compliant and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.
Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector Grant Self Disclosure Program at grantdisclosures@oig.hhs.gov.
Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
For this particular NOFO, note the following:
This section includes the standard NIH review criteria for all NOFOs that include clinical. However, as noted in the description and application information sections, no specific clinical trials should be proposed as part of this application. The review criteria will be applied to the applicant's capabilities/expertise, staffing, resources, and research strategy for the design, development, conduct, monitoring, and analysis of multiple, delayed onset, early phase clinical trials to accelerate development of NCI DCTD/CTEP IND anticancer agents over the course of the project period.
A proposed Clinical Trial application may include study design, methods, and intervention that are not by themselves innovative but address important questions or unmet needs. Additionally, the results of the clinical trial may indicate that further clinical development of the intervention is unwarranted or lead to new avenues of scientific investigation.
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).
Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.
Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? Is the prior research that serves as the key support for the proposed project rigorous? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?
Are the scientific rationale and need for a clinical trial to test the proposed hypothesis or intervention well supported by preliminary data, clinical and/or preclinical studies, or information in the literature or knowledge of biological mechanisms? For trials focusing on clinical or public health endpoints, is this clinical trial necessary for testing the safety, efficacy or effectiveness of an intervention that could lead to a change in clinical practice, community behaviors or health care policy? For trials focusing on mechanistic, behavioral, physiological, biochemical, or other biomedical endpoints, is this trial needed to advance scientific understanding?
Are the PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or those in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training? If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project?
With regard to the proposed leadership for the project, do the PD/PI(s) and key personnel have the expertise, experience, and ability to organize, manage and implement the proposed clinical trial and meet milestones and timelines? Do they have appropriate expertise in study coordination, data management and statistics? For a multicenter trial, is the organizational structure appropriate and does the application identify a core of potential center investigators and staffing for a coordinating center?
Specific to this NOFO: Do the PD(s)/PI(s) and key personnel have the appropriate expertise and experience in the incorporation of biomarkers into early phase clinical trials? Can the PD(s)/PI(s) contribute significantly to the development of clinical trials in rare or uncommon, molecularly defined subsets of patients as well as disease-specific subsets of patients? Does the applicant team have the appropriate level of experience in the regulatory oversight and monitoring of IND studies and performing independent response auditing in early phase clinical trials? Do the PD(s)/PI(s) have sufficient expertise to mentor early phase clinical investigators?
Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?
Does the design/research plan include innovative elements, as appropriate, that enhance its sensitivity, potential for information or potential to advance scientific knowledge or clinical practice?
Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Have the investigators included plans to address weaknesses in the rigor of prior research that serves as the key support for the proposed project? Have the investigators presented strategies to ensure a robust and unbiased approach, as appropriate for the work proposed? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed? Have the investigators presented adequate plans to address relevant biological variables, such as sex, for studies in vertebrate animals or human subjects?
If the project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, are the plans to address 1) the protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion (or exclusion) of individuals on the basis of sex, race, and ethnicity, as well as the inclusion or exclusion of individuals of all ages (including children and older adults), justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?
Does the application adequately address the following, if applicable?
Study Design
Is the study design justified and appropriate to address primary and secondary outcome variable(s)/endpoints that will be clear, informative and relevant to the hypothesis being tested? Is the scientific rationale/premise of the study based on previously well-designed preclinical and/or clinical research? Given the methods used to assign participants and deliver interventions, is the study design adequately powered to answer the research question(s), test the proposed hypothesis/hypotheses, and provide interpretable results? Is the trial appropriately designed to conduct the research efficiently? Are the study populations (size, sex, age, demographic group), proposed intervention arms/dose, and duration of the trial, appropriate and well justified?
Are potential ethical issues adequately addressed? Is the process for obtaining informed consent or assent appropriate? Is the eligible population available? Are the plans for recruitment outreach, enrollment, retention, handling dropouts, missed visits, and losses to follow-up appropriate to ensure robust data collection? Are the planned recruitment timelines feasible and is the plan to monitor accrual adequate? Has the need for randomization (or not), masking (if appropriate), controls, and inclusion/exclusion criteria been addressed? Are differences addressed, if applicable, in the intervention effect due to sex and race/ethnicity?
Are the plans to standardize, assure quality of, and monitor adherence to, the trial protocol and data collection or distribution guidelines appropriate? Is there a plan to obtain required study agent(s)? Does the application propose to use existing available resources, as applicable?
Data Management and Statistical Analysis
Are planned analyses and statistical approach appropriate for the proposed study design and methods used to assign participants and deliver interventions? Are the procedures for data management and quality control of data adequate at clinical site(s) or at center laboratories, as applicable? Have the methods for standardization of procedures for data management to assess the effect of the intervention and quality control been addressed? Is there a plan to complete data analysis within the proposed period of the award?
Specific to this NOFO: Does the applicant demonstrate the potential to overcome critical barriers for robust accrual for ETCTN trials across disease areas, including trials in rare cancers and as well as from representative populations of patients with cancer? Are plans for collaborating with NCI central labs and resources to incorporate biomarker assays sufficient in terms of state-of-the-art quality and an understanding of the role and importance of such studies in early oncologic drug development?
Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements?
If proposed, are the administrative, data coordinating, enrollment and laboratory/testing centers, appropriate for the trial proposed?
Does the application adequately address the capability and ability to conduct the trial at the proposed site(s) or centers? Are the plans to add or drop enrollment centers, as needed, appropriate?
If international site(s) is/are proposed, does the application adequately address the complexity of executing the clinical trial?
If multi-sites/centers, is there evidence of the ability of the individual site or center to: (1) enroll the proposed numbers; (2) adhere to the protocol; (3) collect and transmit data in an accurate and timely fashion; and, (4) operate within the proposed organizational structure?
Specific for this NOFO: Do the resources, facilities, and equipment for research pharmacy management demonstrate a regulatory compliant environment? Do the geographic location and institutional environment(s) impact the integration, communications, and specimen transfer among the ETCTN LAO, AOs, and ICs and transfer from those sites to the central biospecimen bank for the ETCTN? In addition, does the broader institution of record use a single central IRB for all multi-site trials?
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact score, but will not give separate scores for these items.
Is the study timeline described in detail, taking into account start-up activities, the anticipated rate of enrollment, and planned follow-up assessment? Is the projected timeline feasible and well justified? Does the project incorporate efficiencies and utilize existing resources (e.g., CTSAs, practice-based research networks, electronic medical records, administrative database, or patient registries) to increase the efficiency of participant enrollment and data collection, as appropriate?
Are potential challenges and corresponding solutions discussed (e.g., strategies that can be implemented in the event of enrollment shortfalls)?
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
When the proposed project involves human subjects and/or NIH-defined clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for inclusion. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Inclusion in Clinical Research.
The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following three points: (1) a complete description of all proposed procedures including the species, strains, ages, sex, and total numbers of animals to be used; (2) justifications that the species is appropriate for the proposed research and why the research goals cannot be accomplished using an alternative non-animal model; and (3) interventions including analgesia, anesthesia, sedation, palliative care, and humane endpoints that will be used to limit any unavoidable discomfort, distress, pain and injury in the conduct of scientifically valuable research. Methods of euthanasia and justification for selected methods, if NOT consistent with the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, is also required but is found in a separate section of the application. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals Section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animals Section.
Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.
For Resubmissions (as applicable), the committee will evaluate the application as now presented, taking into consideration the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group and changes made to the project.
Not Applicable.
For Renewals (as applicable), the committee will consider the progress made in the last funding period.
For Renewals, the committee will consider the progress made in the last funding period.
For Revisions (as applicable), the committee will consider the appropriateness of the proposed expansion of the scope of the project. If the Revision application relates to a specific line of investigation presented in the original application that was not recommended for approval by the committee, then the committee will consider whether the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group are adequate and whether substantial changes are clearly evident.
Not Applicable.
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Reviewers will assess whether the project presents special opportunities for furthering research programs through the use of unusual talent, resources, populations, or environmental conditions that exist in other countries and either are not readily available in the United States or augment existing U.S. resources.
Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).
Reviewers will comment on whether the Resource Sharing Plan(s) (e.g., Sharing Model Organisms) or the rationale for not sharing the resources, is reasonable.
For projects involving key biological and/or chemical resources, reviewers will comment on the brief plans proposed for identifying and ensuring the validity of those resources.
Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by CSR , in accordance with NIH peer review policies and practices, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will receive a written critique.
May undergo a committee process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.
Requests for reconsideration of initial peer review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this NOFO.
Applications will be assigned to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this NOFO. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the National Cancer Advisory Board. The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.5.1. Just-in-Time Procedures. This request is not a Notice of Award nor should it be construed to be an indicator of possible funding.
Prior to making an award, NIH reviews an applicants federal award history in SAM.gov to ensure sound business practices. An applicant can review and comment on any information in the Responsibility/Qualification records available in SAM.gov. NIH will consider any comments by the applicant in the Responsibility/Qualification records in SAM.gov to ascertain the applicants integrity, business ethics, and performance record of managing Federal awards per 2 CFR Part 200.206 Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants. This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.4.4 Disposition of Applications.
A Notice of Award (NoA) is the official authorizing document notifying the applicant that an award has been made and that funds may be requested from the designated HHS payment system or office. The NoA is signed by the Grants Management Officer and emailed to the recipients business official.
In accepting the award, the recipient agrees that any activities under the award are subject to all provisions currently in effect or implemented during the period of the award, other Department regulations and policies in effect at the time of the award, and applicable statutory provisions.
Recipients must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.6. Funding Restrictions. Any pre-award costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the applicant's own risk. For more information on the Notice of Award, please refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 5. The Notice of Award and NIH Grants & Funding website, see Award Process.
Individual awards are based on the application submitted to, and as approved by, the NIH and are subject to the IC-specific terms and conditions identified in the NoA.
ClinicalTrials.gov: If an award provides for one or more clinical trials. By law (Title VIII, Section 801 of Public Law 110-85), the "responsible party" must register and submit results information for certain applicable clinical trials on the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System Information Website (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov). NIH expects registration and results reporting of all trials whether required under the law or not. For more information, see https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/reporting/index.htm
Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Recipient institutions must ensure that all protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the recipient must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.
Data and Safety Monitoring Requirements: The NIH policy for data and safety monitoring requires oversight and monitoring of all NIH-conducted or -supported human biomedical and behavioral intervention studies (clinical trials) to ensure the safety of participants and the validity and integrity of the data. Further information concerning these requirements is found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/hs/data_safety.htm and in the application instructions (SF424 (R&R) and PHS 398).
Investigational New Drug or Investigational Device Exemption Requirements: Consistent with federal regulations, clinical research projects involving the use of investigational therapeutics, vaccines, or other medical interventions (including licensed products and devices for a purpose other than that for which they were licensed) in humans under a research protocol must be performed under a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational new drug (IND) or investigational device exemption (IDE).
The following Federal wide and HHS-specific policy requirements apply to awards funded through NIH:
All federal statutes and regulations relevant to federal financial assistance, including those highlighted in NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4 Public Policy Requirements, Objectives and Other Appropriation Mandates.
By applying for or accepting federal funds from HHS, recipients certify compliance with all federal antidiscrimination laws and these requirements and that complying with those laws is a material condition of receiving federal funding streams. Recipients are responsible for ensuring subrecipients, contractors, and partners also comply.
Applicants and recipients are strongly encouraged to refer to the NIH Directors Statement of Priorities, entitled Advancing NIHs Mission Through a Unified Strategy.
Recipients are responsible for ensuring that their activities comply with all applicable federal regulations. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.340, by accepting an NIH award, the recipient agrees that continued funding for the award is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds, recipient satisfactory performance, compliance with the Terms and Conditions of the award, and may also otherwise be terminated, to the extent authorized by law, if the agency determines that the award no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities, in line with 2 CFR 200.340(a)(4).
Pursuant to the Cybersecurity Act of 2015, Div. N, § 405, Pub. Law 114-113, 6 USC § 1533(d), the HHS Secretary has established a common set of voluntary, consensus-based, and industry-led guidelines, best practices, methodologies, procedures, and processes.
Successful recipients under this NOFO agree that:
When recipients, subrecipients, or third-party entities have:
Cybersecurity plans and procedures must at minimum include the following:
All activities proposed in your application and budget narrative must align with applicable law, including but not limited to statutes, executive orders, federal regulations and applicable judicial holdings. Accordingly, discretionary awards shall not be used to fund, promote, encourage, subsidize, or facilitate; racial preferences or other forms of racial discrimination by the recipient, including activities where race or intentional proxies for race will be used as a selection criterion for employment or program participation; denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans, or the belief that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic; illegal immigration; or any other initiatives that compromise public safety. If an application does not align, the application will not receive funding to the extent permitted by law and applicable court orders.
For applications involving substance abuse, the application must not support harm reduction. Please see Updated Funding Guidance for Recipients on Supplies and Services.
The following special terms of award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) administrative guidelines, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) grant administration regulations at 2 CFR Part 200, and other HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policies.
The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the cooperative agreement, an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH programmatic involvement with the recipients is anticipated during the performance of the activities. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the recipients for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the recipients and NIH as defined below.
The PD(s)/PI(s) will have the primary responsibility for:
NIH staff have substantial programmatic involvement that is above and beyond the normal stewardship role in awards. The substantially involved NCI program staff member(s), acting as Project Scientist(s), will coordinate in a centralized fashion the various activities of the recipients. Additionally, an agency program official or IC program director will be responsible for the normal scientific and programmatic stewardship of the award and will be named in the award notice. Specific responsibilities of the NCI Project Scientist(s) will include:
NCI will have access to all data collected and/or generated under this Cooperative Agreement and may periodically review the data.NCI reserves the right to reduce the budget or withhold an award in the event of substantial recipient under-performance or other substantial failure to comply with the terms of award.
Areas of Joint Responsibility include:
Dispute Resolution:
Any disagreements that may arise in scientific or programmatic matters (within the scope of the award) between recipients and NIH may be brought to Dispute Resolution. A Dispute Resolution Panel composed of three members will be convened: a designee of the Steering Committee chosen without NIH staff voting, one NIH designee, and a third designee with expertise in the relevant area who is chosen by the other two; in the case of individual disagreement, the first member may be chosen by the individual recipient. This special dispute resolution procedure does not alter the recipient's right to appeal an adverse action that is otherwise appealable in accordance with PHS regulation 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D and HHS regulation 45 CFR Part 16.
A Data Management and Sharing Plan (DMS Plan) is required for any NIH-funded or conducted research that will generate scientific data. Applicants must submit the DMS Plan at the time of application using the NIH DMS Plan Format Page. The DMS Plan must address the elements in the structured format should not exceed two (2) pages. Where the DMS Plan Format Page requires a Yes or No response, no additional narrative is allowed.
When multiple years are involved, recipients will be required to submit the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) annually and financial statements as required in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.4.1 Reporting. To learn more about post-award monitoring and reporting, see the NIH Grants & Funding website, see Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting.
A final RPPR, invention statement, and the expenditure data portion of the Federal Financial Report are required for closeout of an award, as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 8.6 Closeout. NIH NOFOs outline intended research goals and objectives. Post award, NIH will review and measure performance based on the details and outcomes that are shared within the RPPR, as described at 2 CFR Part 200.301.
We encourage inquiries concerning this funding opportunity and welcome the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants.
eRA Service Desk - Questions regarding ASSIST, eRA Commons, application errors and warnings, documenting system problems that threaten submission by the due date, and post-submission issues.
Grants.gov Support Center - Questions regarding Grants.gov registration and services (e.g., Workspace, subscriptions).
NCI ETCTN RFA
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Telephone: 240-276-5930
Email: NCIETCTNRFA@mail.nih.gov
Examine your eRA Commons account for review assignment and contact information (information appears two weeks after the submission due date).
Office of Grants Administration
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Telephone: 240-276-6291
Email: NCIFinancialContact@nih.gov
Recently issued trans-NIH policy notices may affect your application submission. A full list of policy notices published by NIH is provided in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. All awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Awards are made under the authorization of Sections 301 and 405 of the Public Health Service Act as amended (42 USC 241 and 284) and under Federal Regulations 42 CFR Part 52 and 2 CFR Part 200.